Friday, September 18, 2009

Ignorance Isn't Inconsequential So Catch A Clue

I read the most interesting article today on the American Thinker. Randall Hoven asks and answers the question What Would A Communist Do? In order to answer that question he went straight to the source -- the Communist Party USA. He summarized articles listed on listed in reverse chronological order. The below listed only scratches the surface of what he discovered:

What would a communist do about health care? Support it. In an article written by Sam Webb, National Chair, 9/10/2009 entitled Resetting the Health Care Debate, Mr. Webb writes: "As for the supporters of health care reform, we have to be every bit as tenacious as right-wing reaction. Justice, morality, and truth are on our side, but they are not enough. Only when combined with persistence, united action, and struggle over the bill's content, including a public option, will real health care reform see the light of day."

How would a communist support President Obama? Advocate for change. A posted speech given by Sam Webb on 7/30/2009 entitled The Communist Party - A Work in Progress says the following:"President Obama and progressive Congress people can't be the only change agents and will be change agents only up to a point. Our responsibility is to support them, prod them, and constructively take issue with them when we have differing views." But here is the kicker...."But more importantly -- and this is the heart of the matter -- we have to reach, activate, unite, educate, and turn millions of Americans into ‘change agents' who can make the political difference in upcoming struggles."

It isn't at all surprising that communist party would overwhelming support President Obama as they share some of the same core beliefs. Nor is it surprising to me that Americans with even a cursory understanding of political science and/or economics would be slightly concerned about that alone. Couple that with President Obama's affinity for Saul Alinsky, affiliation with Bill Ayers, and eerie similarities to totalitarian leaders like Hitler, Lenin, and Stalin and it is telling that more people aren't concerned. How can one be concerned about something you know nothing about? Therein lies the problem. Americans by and large are not only uninformed, but so uninformed that they don't know that they are uniformed. One blogger snarkily expressed it like this:"You don’t have a clue. You’ve been living in the Matrix and don’t know what true Socialism/Communism is. You’ve never been taught Stalin or Mao. You think you want Socialism/Communism because you’ve been taught how unfair Capitalism and the free market are....The useful idiots that put Stalin and Mao in power thought the same." - Fox

To the clueless,there is fairness, justice and equality in spreading the wealth that was rewarded to the wealthy via capitalism. They can not fathom how the inherent unfairness of capitalism (which I consider health competition) drives the desire to improve, accomplish and achieve.
Social and Economic Justice are merely palatable synonyms for Socialism promulgated by the socialist elite and their minions.

So here is the problem --the Socialist elite have money and enough of it to place their operatives throughout the offices of Capitol and White House. The clueless become increasingly clueless and beget clueless children and that is exactly what the socialist elite want. Their goal is to ensure that the clueless remain dumb and indoctrinated by the public school systems, colleges and universities without any real knowledge of who is leading them and why.

So I will leave it to the reader to catch a clue.
Hint: Start with the George Soros/Barack Obama connection.


Foxwood said...

Thanks for adding the quote. Snarky? Sometimes it gets worse, beware. I don't get the time to update daily, but I hang out at a place with like minded people and thought you might enjoy. Tell VF Foxwood sent you.

Check out Voting Female.

As for the Socialist/Communist wannabes... They don't realize that their elite leaders live the life they abhor. What does it take to block that out? I don't remember, is it the red pill or the blue pill?

Joe Clyde said...

Simple question that I hope someone could answer without cutting and pasting.

Why is George Soros evil?

Attorneymom said...


Sidebar: Luv ya like a sista!!!

Smile said...

@Joe Clyde - "Simple question that I hope someone could answer without cutting and pasting."

You "hope" for an answer to an off topic and irrelevant question. It is a distraction attempt and quite tiring. With directions no less!

You've already decided on your opinion but you want 'talking points' opportunity with whatever answer you get. No thank you.

My suggestion is for you to enter into the Conservative conversation going on here in a respectful and relevant way, minus the gaming. Otherwise, you will find yourself often ignored.

So, quit with the hijackass thing.

Smile said...


The cat like comments you make to my "sista" are starting to annoy me. Just sayin'.

Actually, some intelligent responses to a well written piece about a serious and pertinent issue is something I'm confident could be forthcoming. Then again, perhaps actual ideology isn't important when one is concentrating on being a sheeple.

Conservative Black Woman said...

JoeClyde~You ask a question and then request that we give an emotional or viseral answer to the question. I wonder why? Is it that you don't want the facts to complicate things.
Well, I'll do my best....I don't think I've called George Soros evil. I tried in this post to outline the agenda of the socialist left who have invaded the democrat party and expose the modis operandi. Now if you don't find anything diabolical about said agenda and modis operandi then you are a special kind of fella. I do know just off the top of my head that George Soros has on more than one occasion hedged bets against nations and profited from their financial demise. He is known as the man of broke the Bank of England. He has done the same sort of thing in Russia and Malaysia. Those of us who have a clue believe that he bankrolled Barack Obama for a reason, because our economy is precarious and that means spells opportunity for Soros because that's how he rolls. The fact that Barack Obama has done everything in his power to make the economy even worse leads those of us with a clue to believe that he is doing his master's (Soro's) bidding. We believe that Barack Obama is intentionally bankrupting this economy and you clueless drones are too indoctrined and mis-educated to realize it.

Conservative Black Woman said...

Attymom~I know you do...

Smile said...

Here's something I ran across by someone I've found to have a gift for writing.

"I hate to reduce it to the obvious, but men have penises and women have vaginas. I'm not in charge of all of this stuff, mind you, but I did grow up in the country and did sit through several weeks of sex education in the 6th grade. Call me wise beyond my years.

In Britain, however, things operate a bit differently, particularly when it involves prisoners, socialized medicine, and leftist attitudes on health and safety."

The rest of the article is an interesting example of what takes place when gov't is in charge of who, what, and how much, as pertains our health care 'choices', all while deciding that many will wait or be denied. Click here to see the full article. Be warned, the writer confesses to typing while having underwear on.

MrsGrapevine said...

By your and his argument that would make France, England, Canada, and every other country including 52% Americans who voted for Obama communist. Everyone in the world is a communist except for Americans Conservatives. Jesus for the matter would be a communist by that argument.

When you over reach is just undermines your argument, and makes is sound absurd.

For example: White supremacist agree with Glenn Beck that Obama is racist, therefore Glenn Beck is a white supremacist because they overwhelmingly support his statement. What would a white supremacist say about Beck or Limbaugh? Right On!

Sounds absurd, huh?

Example 2: To use your logic that would make Bush a demagogue because what would demagogue do, invade a sovereign country to prevent a "preemptive" strike. What would pass demagogues say about Bush invasion of Iraq?

MrsGrapevine said...

@ Joe Clyde:

I know you're not speaking "talking points". As if there is guide they give to liberals, called Talking Points for Dummies.

If you don't agree with them then you are ignorant. Don't worry we also feel if they don't agree with us then they're ignorant, too.

Now, I guess we are a bunch of educated ignorant people (conservatives and liberals) who think they are right because they think against the grain.

It's amazing how all these ignorant people seem to read a lot, and be very informed about history and their party.

Don't worry if you're called names, just stick to the arguments and your points. Don't get distracted.

Before it's over you will be called a troll, ignorant, and a socialist. Someone may even suggest beating you with a crack pipe, and not see how that's not Christian like, yet claim to have faith. They may even talk about you in third person as if you can't figure it out, or suggest you don't belong here because they only want like minded thinkers...

It's just their way of showing love. It's hazing if you will, to see how strong you are. Somehow I still love them all...almost all.

Conservative Black Woman said...

MrsGrapevine~I will start by sincerely apologizing if you feel you have been disparaged and/or disrespected on these threads. When you first starting commenting here I was in the midst of a personal crisis and would just post and never look back. A few weeks later, I regretably exhibited some pretty ugly behavior to a gentleman who offended me for which I apologized and I am terribly embarrassed by it.

I realize that people with higher IQ's and far more education that I have read my blog and comment here and that's exactly why I get so frustrated.....Notice this post highlights having a clue not having a brain.

That being said it was a communist Norm Thomas who publically opined in 1946 that "The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened."

You suggest that by my logic the 52% of Americans who vote for Obama are communist which illustrates that you missed the point. My argument was constructed as follows:

1. The Communist Party USA support Barack Obama.

2. It is reasonable that they support Barack Obama because they share some of the same core beliefs.

3. Barack Obama has an affinity for self-confessed socialists and it is reasonable to be concerned about that fact.

4. Americans are uninformed and they don't even realized that they are uniformed. (notice I made no distinction between Conservative and non-conservatives, democrat or republican

5. American's don't realize that they are uniformed because:
a. Liberals run the schools and liberalism is the vehicle used by communist/socialist (straight from the horses mouth--Norm Thomas)
b. Liberal(Socialist elite)do not tell you that their goal is to indoctrinate you as that defeats the purpose. (Remember they know Americans will never willingly accept it.)

6. Therefore by my logic, the 52% of Americans who voted for Obama are in point of fact not Communist, for if they were then they would not be "clueless" but complicit -- Therefore the post would not have been entitled Ignorance Isn't Inconsequential but rather Knowledge is Power

Conservative Black Woman said...

JoeClyde~P.S. because you forbade me to copy and paste and I couldn't remember which communist of note said this I let it go....But, once I found out who made this statementit's too rich not to share with you. So in the spirit of catching a clue...and George Soros....

Catch the clue:

1. We know Soros hedges against the national currencies, bankrupts nations repeatedly (it would be cool if I could say he has hit every continent but I'm not sure)

now see if you can connect the dots...

Vladmir Lenin said the following:

“The best way to destroy the capitalist system is to debauch the currency.”

Did you catch it?

keith said...


keith said...


1. The Communist Party USA support Barack Obama.

***The Klu Klux Klan supports the republican party.***

2. It is reasonable that they support Barack Obama because they share some of the same core beliefs.

***It is reasonable that they support the republican party because they share some of the same CORE beliefs,***

3. Barack Obama has an affinity for self-confessed socialists and it is reasonable to be concerned about that fact.

***Republicans have an affinity for self-confessed racists and it is reasonable to be concerned about that fact.***

4. Americans are uninformed and they don't even realized that they are uniformed. (notice I made no distinction between Conservative and non-conservatives, democrat or republican)


Conservative Black Woman said...

Keith~You write that the KKK supports the Republican Party. Really? Can you site a reference, website, anything that would support your claim that the KKK have publically endorsed the Republican party as I have with the CPUSA and Barack Obama? I guess you don't know that the KKK served as the terrorist arm of the Nat'l Democratic Party during reconstruction or that Sen. Robert Byrd a democrat is an admitted Klansman (well ex-klansman he says)and in 2007 said that we need to stop talking about race so much because there are "white niggers" too....Here is the link:

keith said...


David Duke was/is a republican.

Flashback: November 1st 2008 clan meeting. The grand dragon speaks...

"Fellow klansmen, we must vote for Obama over Mccain."

You have now entered the twlight zone.


Conservative Black Woman said...

Keith~Thank you for proving my point.

keith said...

And neither the dems or repubs are the same parties they were during reconstruction.

By the way I'm not a D or an R.

I depise them both.


keith said...


I'm a working blackman scrambling to get out the door! I'll get your proof soon!


MrsGrapevine said...


1)I have noticed that on this site people switch between conservative and Republican when it's most convenient for them, as if it's the same or has always been the same affiliation.

2)First disclaimer: The Republican party and the Conservative party have not always been the same political affiliation.

3)On this blog you stated that the Republican party freed the slaves and was the political force behind Reconstruction, and the motivation behind civil rights.

4)On this blog people have said the Democrats were the racist, who opposed slavery, who succeeded from this country, and who created the Ku Klux Klan. All these are facts an undisputed.

5)Prior to civil rights movement Republicans were labeled radical and liberal, not conservative by any means. Blacks were affiliated with the Republicans.

Democrats were conservative because they didn't want their way of live to change. They even endorsed inequality.

6) Well in 1960's the modern conservative movement began; the conservative party which you are self-proclaim affiliate. In the election of 1964 those racist Democrats that we call "Dixiecrats" shifted parties to oppose civil rights because they didn't appreciate the Democrats "pandering" to the blacks. The modern conservative movement became inundated with Dixiecrats who shared their values.

During that year blacks overwhelmingly shifted to the Democrat party from the Republican party because they valued equal rights. The Democrats from that point on became affiliated with liberalism, the same name once given to Republicans. The Republicans became affiliated with Conservatives, you know those racist Democrats of the past.

7) This is the big shift in our country when liberals became Democrats and Conservatives became Republicans. My question to you is what happened to all the racism and beliefs of inequality? Did it just conveniently evaporate when Conservatives became Republicans, or did it become indoctrinated in their philosophy, their ideology? On the flip-side, when did liberalism and radicalism become evil and un-American? In 1964 when blacks moved parties?

8) Where is my proof? A United States map showing the political parties by region. The one today is very similar to the ones before 1950, except for one exception. The labels.

The rural areas and the South which dominated the Democrat party prior to civil rights is the same area that's now called the Republicans, and not just Republican but the heart of Conservatives. Makes a person want to go hmmmmm...How could we possibly think they affiliate with people who are racist, or even the Klan for that matter?

Joe Clyde said...


I will take that answer as a "I don't know. I just listen to what Rush tells me to say."

Thanks for your response.

Joe Clyde said...

"MrsGrapevine~I will start by sincerely apologizing if you feel you have been disparaged and/or disrespected on these threads."

Yet I get no apology. Typical.


Hannity has people trained to talk about "kkk" byrd or Al Gore's father when people talk about the Klan in the Rebulican party.

The power of repeating is amazing.

Conservative Black Woman said...

JoeClyde~If you feel bismirched, disparaged or in anyway disrespected than the apology is extended you you as well. OK enough with the niceties.

I told you who I listen to..was Hannity among them? NO. So if I were trained, which I'm not Mr. Hannity would not be the one.

Prove to you how Al and Jesse have race-baited...that's like proving that water is

In 1987 Al Sharpton, during the infamous Tawana Brawley case, falsely accused a former assistant district attorney of raping and sodomizing Ms. Brawley. Young Tawana stated that white racists abducted, raped, and sodomized her, scrawling the initials “KKK” on her in human feces. A grand jury later found the entire incident a complete hoax. Most likely, Ms. Brawley, afraid of punishment for staying out too late, fabricated the entire story. This did not stop Reverend Al Sharpton, who accused Pagones an assistant district attorney, of the crime. “We stated openly that Steven Pagones did it. If we’re lying, sue us, so we can go into court with you and prove you did it. Sue us—sue us right now.

Pagones did. After receiving death threats, and threats against his child, Pagones sued Sharpton and two others for defamation. A jury unanimously concluded that Sharpton defamed Pagones, ordering Sharpton to pay $65,000 to Pagones. The Reverend promptly announced his intention not to pay. A couple years later, Sharpton’s buddies passed the hat and paid off Sharpton’s debt, which totaled $87,000 with interest and penalties. To this day, never having paid one penny of his own to Pagones...(Why am I not surprised)

1991, Gavin Cato, a seven-year-old black child was killed in a traffic accident in Crown Heights (in Brooklyn), when a car driven by a Hasidic Jew went out of control. Sharpton turned it into a racial incident. Sharpton led 400 protesters through the Jewish section of Crown Heights, with one protester holding a sign that read, “The White Man Is the Devil.” There were four nights of rock- and bottle-throwing, and a young Talmudic scholar was surrounded by a mob shouting, “Kill the Jew” and stabbed to death. A hundred others were injured. Sharpton said, “The world will tell us that [Gavin Cato] was killed by accident….What type of city do we have that would allow politics to rise above the blood of innocent babies? (Betcha, he doesn't give a damn about the abortion clinic killing black babies)

1995 Jackson, questioned why Bush has not named blacks to top positions in the federal response to the disaster, particularly when the majority of victims remaining stranded in New Orleans are black: "How can blacks be locked out of the leadership, and trapped in the suffering?"

"It is that lack of sensitivity and compassion that represents a kind of incompetence."'

(At a time when black people needed help, he's trying to get jobs for his cronies. And, besides that, Jackson was just wrong. 'U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Russell Honore, headed military task force overseeing operations in the three states, he was black.)

Joe Clyde said...

I believe that Al, and Jesse are opportunits.

I was never defending them.

I was basically saying that Glenn Beck, Hannity, Rush, and Michael Savage are no better at the minimum and far worse at the extreme.

Yet you seem incapable of seeing the race baiting on their side.