Misconceptions, Confusions, and Conflicts Concerning Socialism, Communism, and Capitalism

Note: I originally credited this article to Paul Brians, however he has written to inform me that the article below was not written by him and the article he wrote can be found at:

http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/hum_303/misconceptions.html

This is an excerpt from a Study Guide for Humanities 303: Reason, Romanticism & Revolution, posted by Washington State University at Pullman.  I found it as I conducted a google search on Fabian Marxism (terminology that I vaguely remember from college but didn't pay much attention to unfortunately) Anyway,  this is such a great read and explains what we are facing so succinctly that I decided to post it here you will find my commentary in red:

Marxism is the plan to Rebuild the World into a one-world government under a benevolent dictatorship of the working class. The plan was to create constant world chaos via violent revolutions AND via infiltration of Marxist change agents into legitimate government bodies (Barack Hussein Obama is the change agent and I'd say that the President of the United State is a legitimate government office) . The Marxists openly support and teach the use of propaganda, lies, murder, and terror to achieve their goal of a New World Order. To the Marxist the end justifies the means. The Hegelian-Marxist dialectic was designed to foment global instability so they could accuse the very concept of national governments as being the primary cause for all global problems. The idea was that once the world was completely fed up with the constant Marxist induced conflicts, the same Marxists could rise to the occassion and offer their Darwinian socially evolved solution to nationalist terrorism. To the Marxist, NATIONS are the problem (Think back to Pres. Obama saying  pleading for "a new era of engagement" on world problems, telling the United Nations the United States shouldn't pursue a go-it-alone stance in his his first speech to world leaders at the U.N.). They say if we eliminate all national borders then wars will cease and everybody will suddenly turn into selfless volunteers for the world collective. The solution has always been to eliminate ALL borders, seize power over all national governments, and to consolidate power over trade and individuals under an exclusive one-world Marxist government. (This is as clear as day! Why can't Obama acolytes see what's happening! First they took over the banks, then the car industry, then health care, now they are taking over private student loans and Amnesty is next) (emphasis added)

Many Americans have already unwittingly embraced Marxism, and the rest of us have been tricked into living under it. Marxist ideology is promoted by both the American right and the American left, and it's the ideology behind all the modern laws that promote international Human Rights and Sustainable Development. Communitarian law is Marxist law. The Fabian-Marxists have done a lovely slow march through American institutions, and once we understand their language and their game plan, we can easily identify the extensive inroads they've made into every aspect of American life. Our formerly free nation has totally succumbed to Marxist propaganda on almost every political level. Marxist visioning is part of the platform of many American politicians, and all local community and rural development use the Marxist visioning process to rebuild the neighborhood. The Marxists control the entire Peace Movement, they're the primary proponents of American disarmament, they control the environmental movement, and they want to take American Imperialism before the World Court. The U.S. invasion of Iraq was only part of a well-designed plan to promote and enforce Marxist democratic principles globally. Modern democracy is Marxism.(emphasis added)

Most modern liberal Marxists claim to be a gentler version of Marxism as opposed to the openly murderous "Stalinists." So too are the far-right neo-cons defined as new Trotskyists. Neither opposing side ever admits any fundamental flaws to the Marxist "theory," they will only concede that there are wrong "interpretations." The defined problems are always U.S. Capitalism and Imperialism (as created by the British), never the Marxist-Fabian's slow, steady infiltration into all U.S. government agencies. Noam Chomsky, Ramsey Clark, the entire anti-war coalition seek redress of grievances from the United Nations. The left never seeks a U.S. Constitutional solution. The United Nations International Court at the Hague is the final synthesis to the constant conflicts, which is why the Radical Middle cannot examine or expose the slow march into U.S. government agencies as a communist-communitarian coup.(emphasis added)

The Hegelian conflict has grown very difficult to follow since the United States began following Marxist doctrines. Few Americans understand that their constitutional individual rights have been replaced by the Marxist ideals of "human rights." (Most Americans believe that Health Insurance is a Human right -- but only an uber-marxist would declare that Health Insurance is a Civil Right like Rep. James Clyburn) Human rights includes the socialist ideal of state controlled industry and trade. Every legitimate objection to U.S. fascism is turned into another road that leads directly to socialist revolution and an ultimate dictatorship of the communist elite. None of these organizations or authors will examine (or even mention) the communist-communitarian takeover of the U.S. government. Instead of investigating the history of the CIA and U.S. ties to Israel as part of the Marxist's plan for global revolution, America's far-left simply calls for global Marxist revolution and "socialist reform."(emphasis added)

The left uses everything from distortions of the U.S. flag to distortions of "free enterprise capitalism." Revolutionary authors come from the far-left and the libertarian right. It's very challenging to look past the rhetoric used by the libertarian-leftists who villify the American system. The most obvious signs are when they use Darwin-Hegelian theories of social evolution to explain how the United States just somehow became a world terror organization after WWII. It's even more obvious when they don't bother to explain it at all.  (emphasis added) (Source)

Today is a Momentous Day!

I just read this article written by Victor the Contractor over at the Doug Ross @Journal blog:

Today is a Momentous Day!

Today is the day! Today is the day that all Americans see the naked ambition of fifteen percent of the population as they exert their will over the silent, hard working 85 percent. Today is the culmination of many years of hard work in swaying public perception, breaking down the walls of decency and building a climate of victimization and entitlement. Today the House of Representatives votes on the Senate Health Care Reform Act.

Never mind that no one has actually read this pork nirvana: this bill that nationalizes one sixth of the economy. Never mind that this bill is a slap in the face to all who work hard and don't expect or would accept a handout from anyone. Never mind that, on its face, the bill is a brazen attempt to subvert the Constitution of the United States and assign obligations to buy a service and criminalization of the God-given right to choose.

The right to choose not to buy a service one may see as a bad bargain, or the right to decide what is right for your own body. Those who have eroded the belief in right and wrong for decades; who have literally made a federal case over the right to control a person's body; who have cried that the state had no business, indeed no say at all, about what what one put in their body, believed in their head, and even what they did to their unborn children. Now those very same harpies have turned that tenet on its head as they grasp at the ability to regulate every aspect of what we do with the body God gave us.

A God they do not believe in and they do not seem accountable to. For we live in a time where the ugliest of motivations are cloaked in compassion. A time where the killing of an unborn child is seen as 'kind' as opposed to saddling a selfish couple with the 'burden' of raising unwanted offspring. A time where the lazy and the losers in the lottery of life are trying to maintain a lifestyle by taxing the driven and conscientious people who make this country hum with productivity. These are times that try the morals of men as those who want to invalidate hard work and drive have control of the levers of power and use that awful responsibility for their own gain and avarice.

Before you go on and whine about the poor and stricken and the addict who can neither care for themselves or have the tools to prosper in this world, know this: Life is a harsh taskmaster who punishes the dumb, the lazy and the foolish with scourge and tribulation until they learn to operate within the constraints of civilization. Lessons you don't learn or fail to heed as a child will be revisited repeatedly until you get with the program, succumb to the destruction brought on by your own lusts. Attempts to rewrite God's law, or common sense, for those agnostically inclined, will always result in an unbalanced society that careens hither and yon morally, until it sputters to a halt, mired in the ambivalence of indecision and relativism. A civilization that feels more empathy for the sinners than the sinned-against is destined to fail as the criminals achieve a critical mass and take the controls in efforts to profit from the moral decline.

We have such a state of affairs now. The ugly girl at the dance is now calling the tune, much to the chagrin of the highly offended orchestra. The drop-outs who threw stones at the University's stained glass windows now are the faculty; destroying the ideas and ethics that made this country great. There is a joke in the trades that men teach their children to work before they go off to college and get ruined. The ability to define right and wrong is the hallmark of a great society and the lack thereof the talisman of a civilization in decline. The loafers and anti-establishment crowd of the sixties are now deciding the tax rate for the rest of us, and they are not amused anymore. They are out for revenge. Revenge on the 'boy scouts' who kept their collective noses clean and worked eighty hours a week and put their kids through college and took care of their ailing parents and saluted on Veteran's Day all across this fine country.

'Liberal' doesn't even begin to appropriately label these Marxists! They really are the failed Communists who sewed the cancer of relativism into our public psyche and tried with all of their drug-addled reasoning to convince the rest of us that drive and vigor were not valid traits and conscientiousness was tantamount to selfishness. That success was to be punished, or at least taxed to support the 'less able' among us.

The Democrat majority in both Houses and the Marxist in the White House are poised to enact their vengeance today on all those who ignored their pleas for fairness and charity to the losers and lazy in society. Today they can 'get over' on the corporate toadies and millionaires who rule over and abuse the working class. If it were that easy, FDR, LBJ or even Ralph Nader would have so changed the collective zeitgeist to such an extant that this latest populist farce would be ignored, even maligned by the healthy, prosperous and well adjusted masses.

Instead we have an anti-St. Patrick leading the snakes from the swamps right into the halls of power. Its ironic that the 'most transparent' government in history has hidden its agenda and blocked public reflection on its programs. Its ironic that even the President is not sure what is actually in the health care bill and more troubling that he doesn't care by what process it arrives at his desk. It will be law, no matter how many seats are lost in the coming elections.

This rush to political suicide by an overtly socialist Democrat Party barely disguises the real intent of this travesty of legislative process: the health care reform bill is Communism. Socialism is a 'cooperative' between business and Government. Communism's hallmark is the Government's possession of the means of production. I trot out this aged mare to make a point: a government that can nationalize the better part of a native automobile industry is, by its very nature, Communistic. Such a Government should not be trusted to 'nurse' a substantially healthy industry. Period. If its too big to fail, its just too big.

If the Government can decide that an entire industry needs to be saved and defies its own Constitution to do so, then that Government is invalid and must go. I trust that the Supreme Court will strike this law as soon as the mountain of lawsuits start. But what do we make of a process by which a minority of the population forces its mindset on the majority? Under what authority have GM and Chrysler been seized? Its not Constitutional. And neither is this health care bill.

Yes, today is a momentous day! It is the day we declare war on Liberalism. Today is the day we record the vote for this Communistic legislation. Today we make plans to campaign against our socialist Senators, reprobate Representatives and power-hungry President. And, pass or fail, we will know who voted for our 'right to choose' and who opted for a 'Stalinization' of our legislative process. It works both ways: Freedom of choice extends to the right to choose NOT to do, buy or consume anything, for whatever reason.

"Give me Liberty or give me death!"

Victor The Contractor (Source)

Philanthropy or Ethnic Cleansing?

At a recent invitation-only conference in Long Beach, California TED2010, Bill Gates actually revealed the true agenda of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. In a speech titled, “Innovating to Zero!”, Gates announces that his one wish would be  reducing man made CO2 emissions worldwide to zero by 2050. He declares: “First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”(emphasis added) -- I generally try not to cuss but WTF!!!!!!!! If you think I'm making this up watch the video (here)




He actually said in plain English that he expects vaccines and healthcare to LOWER POPULATION GROWTH!!!! Yes, he said reproductive health services too but we all know that's code for abortion and obviously that lowers population (especially in the black community but I digress). Oh yes, did you check out the picture behind him was composed of black and brown people? I tell you, these liberals really do just love black folks to death (pun most definitely intended).
 
Bill Gates puts his money where his mouth is too, in January 2010 at the  Davos World Economic Forum, Gates announced his foundation would give $10 billion over the next decade to develop and deliver new vaccines to children in the developing world.  Mr. Gates rationalizes his brand of "ethnic cleansing" which he calls "population reduction" is for the good of the planet. He also maintains that it's for the greater good of the people in this  CNN interview:  
"Well, the most exciting thing I learned when I was just getting into philanthropy was that, if you reduce childhood deaths, if you improve health in a society, that, surprisingly, population growth goes down. And that's because a parent needs to have some children survive into adulthood to take care of them when they're old. And so, if they think having six children is what they need to do to have at least two survive, that's what they'll do." (Source)

Am I the only one who thinks that's a bit of a stretch?
 
I'm inclined to think that these inoculations are deleterious to the reproductive health of these black and brown people.  For the life of me I can't figure out why the racism chasers aren't all over this (that's a lie I know why-- but I digress, again).

Unfortunately, Gates’ interest in inducing population reduction among the black  and other minority people is  unfortunately not new. In the 1920’s the Rockefeller Foundation  funded the eugenics research in Germany through the Kaiser-Wilhelm Institutes in Berlin and Munich. They praised the forced sterilization of people by Hitler Germany, and the Nazi ideas on race “purity.”  John D. Rockefeller III, was a life-long advocate of eugenics, who used his “tax free” foundation money to initiate the population reduction  movement through his private Population Council  in the 1950’s.  Neither is the idea of using vaccines to covertly reduce births in the Third World new. Bill Gates’ good friend, David Rockefeller and his Rockefeller Foundation were involved in this  as early as 1972 in a major project together with World Health Organization  to perfect a new vaccine.
"The results of the WHO-Rockefeller project were put into mass application on human guinea pigs in the early 1990’s. The WHO oversaw massive vaccination campaigns against tetanus in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines. Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization, became suspicious of the motives behind the WHO program and decided to test numerous vials of the vaccine and found them to contain human Chorionic Gonadotrophin, or hCG. That was a curious component for a vaccine designed to protect people against lock-jaw arising from infection with rusty nail wounds or other contact with certain bacteria found in soil. The tetanus disease was indeed, also rather rare. It was also curious because hCG was a natural hormone needed to maintain a pregnancy. However, when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier, it stimulated formation of antibodies against hCG, rendering a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy, a form of concealed abortion. Similar reports of vaccines laced with hCG hormones came from the Philippines and Nicaragua." (Source)


So, what say you? Philanthropy or Ethnic Cleansing?  Well, even if it isn't ethnic cleansing it sure as hell isn't benevolent.

If You Are Still Not Convinced That Obama Lies Then You Are Terminally Stupid

This man will stop at nothing including making himself look like a complete imbecile to peddle this damnable Healthcare bill. I wonder now if Obama supporters are now pursuaded that this man really thinks they are stupid? If you are still an Obama supporter after running these numbers then this is the one thing he is right about.



Simple math folks:

It an employer pays 10,000 premium and gets a 3000% discount then said employer would receive a refund of  $290,000!!!!!

Why would he say that? Isn't he supposed to be a genius? Could he have meant 300% but even if he did that would be just as preposterous. A 100% discount would make it free! The only logical conclusion one could draw from this debacle is that the Salesman in Chief is desperate to pass this bill.  Why?