Tuesday, September 13, 2011

9/11: A Conspiracy Theory



(See Transcript Below....Don't miss the meat...follow the hyperlinks)

Everything you ever wanted to know about the 9/11 conspiracy theory in under 5 minutes.

  TRANSCRIPT: On the morning of September 11, 2001, 19 men armed with boxcutters directed by a man on dialysis in a cave fortress halfway around the world using a satellite phone and a laptop directed the most sophisticated penetration of the most heavily-defended airspace in the world, overpowering the passengers and the military combat-trained pilots on 4 commercial aircraft before flying those planes wildly off course for over an hour without being molested by a single fighter interceptor.
These 19 hijackers, devout religious fundamentalists who liked to drink alcohol, snort cocaine, and live with pink-haired strippers, managed to knock down 3 buildings with 2 planes in New York, while in Washington a pilot who couldn’t handle a single engine Cessna was able to fly a 757 in an 8,000 foot descending 270 degree corskscrew turn to come exactly level with the ground, hitting the Pentagon in the budget analyst office where DoD staffers were working on the mystery of the 2.3 trillion dollars that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had announced “missing” from the Pentagon’s coffers in a press conference the day before, on September 10, 2001.
Luckily, the news anchors knew who did it within minutes, the pundits knew within hours, the Administration knew within the day, and the evidence literally fell into the FBI’s lap. But for some reason a bunch of crazy conspiracy theorists demanded an investigation into the greatest attack on American soil in history.
The investigation was delayed, underfunded, set up to fail, a conflict of interest and a cover up from start to finish. It was based on testimony extracted through torture, the records of which were destroyed. It failed to mention the existence of WTC7, Able Danger, Ptech, Sibel Edmonds, OBL and the CIA, and the drills of hijacked aircraft being flown into buildings that were being simulated at the precise same time that those events were actually happening. It was lied to by the Pentagon, the CIA, the Bush Administration and as for Bush and Cheney…well, no one knows what they told it because they testified in secret, off the record, not under oath and behind closed doors. It didn’t bother to look at who funded the attacks because that question is of “little practical significance“. Still, the 9/11 Commission did brilliantly, answering all of the questions the public had (except most of the victims’ family members’ questions) and pinned blame on all the people responsible (although no one so much as lost their job), determining the attacks were “a failure of imagination” because “I don’t think anyone could envision flying airplanes into buildings ” except the Pentagon and FEMA and NORAD and the NRO.
The DIA destroyed 2.5 TB of data on Able Danger, but that’s OK because it probably wasn’t important.
The SEC destroyed their records on the investigation into the insider trading before the attacks, but that’s OK because destroying the records of the largest investigation in SEC history is just part of routine record keeping.
NIST has classified the data that they used for their model of WTC7′s collapse, but that’s OK because knowing how they made their model of that collapse would “jeopardize public safety“.
The FBI has argued that all material related to their investigation of 9/11 should be kept secret from the public, but that’s OK because the FBI probably has nothing to hide.
This man never existed, nor is anything he had to say worthy of your attention, and if you say otherwise you are a paranoid conspiracy theorist and deserve to be shunned by all of humanity. Likewise him, him, him, and her. (and her and her and him).
Osama Bin Laden lived in a cave fortress in the hills of Afghanistan, but somehow got away. Then he was hiding out in Tora Bora but somehow got away. Then he lived in Abottabad for years, taunting the most comprehensive intelligence dragnet employing the most sophisticated technology in the history of the world for 10 years, releasing video after video with complete impunity (and getting younger and younger as he did so), before finally being found in a daring SEAL team raid which wasn’t recorded on video, in which he didn’t resist or use his wife as a human shield, and in which these crack special forces operatives panicked and killed this unarmed man, supposedly the best source of intelligence about those dastardly terrorists on the planet. Then they dumped his body in the ocean before telling anyone about it. Then a couple dozen of that team’s members died in a helicopter crash in Afghanistan.
This is the story of 9/11, brought to you by the media which told you the hard truths about JFK and incubator babies and mobile production facilities and the rescue of Jessica Lynch.
If you have any questions about this story…you are a batshit, paranoid, tinfoil, dog-abusing baby-hater and will be reviled by everyone. If you love your country and/or freedom, happiness, rainbows, rock and roll, puppy dogs, apple pie and your grandma, you will never ever express doubts about any part of this story to anyone. Ever.
This has been a public service announcement by: the Friends of the FBI, CIA, NSA, DIA, SEC, MSM, White House, NIST, and the 9/11 Commission. Because Ignorance is Strength.. (Source)

I love this....please follow the hyperlinks.

Friday, July 22, 2011

Why Obama and NATO are Gang Raping and Bombing The Hell Out Of Libya

Ask your average American Black or White, Democrat or Republican about Libya and they will tell you that Gaddaffi is as crazy as Kootie Brown, a loose canon, a dictator. I confess that two years ago as I watched Gaddaffi's incredibly long diatribe in front of the UN I thought he was "off " too.  But now I think how "off" I was to think such a thing. I didn't know what he was saying, I don't speak Arabic. How arrogant of me to assume that he was crazy. There was a translator but my mind was made up -- he was crazy because Rush or the announcer on Fox, or CBS or whatever station I was tuned in to said he was crazy.

Fast forward to April 21,2011 -- Obama approves drone attack on Libya without congressional approval and calls it a Humanitarian effort. Well  I knew that was complete and utter bullshit. But I couldn't imagine why he would do such a thing? I know that he produced the bogus counterfeit long form birth certificate shortly thereafter and then supposedly (for the benefit of those whose heads screw on and off) captured and killed OBL. I know that those two little spectacles were done to draw attention away from the drone attack but I could never figure out  WHY ??? Until today when I learned that Libya has a public central banking system which provides interest free loans and has NO national debt! Libya has not sold itself out to the private central bankers that the United States and all of the NATO nations have. Gaddaffi will not succumb to the New World Order Plan and the Globalist aka Obama's bosses are furious. The nerve of Gaddaffi to maintain Libya's sovereignty! If only our  President had the cajones to stand up to the Private Central Banks and reclaim our sovereignty.

George W. Berry wrote a great article on his website crashareyouready.com which I've reprinted below:

Gaddafi: A New World Order Obstacle

Gaddafi speaks out against the New World Order: Gaddafi makes an impassioned speech for Peace and Democracy at the United Nations.
Libya IS a Democracy, contrary to NWO propaganda.   The United Nations is NOT a democracy. The General Assembly is window dressing for all the other Nations of the world to release ritualistic steam, like speakers in Hyde Park. The Security Council is where all power is concentrated.
No nation can be a Sovereign Nation that does not have sovereignty over issuing its own money. Issuing the money supply is THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL ASPECT OF SOVEREIGNTY! In today’s world, banks are essential. A Central Bank is like the heart of a human being. It pumps money into the economy just as a human heart pumps blood. A nation’s Sovereign Public Central Bank, like the Bank of Libya which makes loans interest free, produces prosperity and freedom from compounding debt. A Private Central Bank, like the USA “Federal” Reserve Bank or the Bank of “England” is a vampire system for legalized theft of a nation’s assets. A Private Central Bank forces a nations’ citizens into compounding debt  -  into debt-slavery. The implantation of a Private Central Bank into a nation’s economy is the exact equivalent of a vampire disguised as a doctor doing bypass surgery on a patient to pump more and more blood AWAY from the patient’s body and into the vampire’s fangs! A Public Central Bank is an Organic Bank which is accountable to the citizens (Search “Public Central Bank” on my web site.). A Private Central Bank is a Parasitic Bank accountable to no one – which brings us back to the concepts of dictatorship, democracy, and sovereignty.
The artificial implantation of a Private Central Bank is an OFFICIAL SURRENDER OF SOVEREIGNTY by the host nation. The Private Central Bank’s owners become the source of ALL power, because they have HIJACKED the nation’s money supply. The host nation, no longer being sovereign, obeys the orders of the DICTATOR. The controllers of the money supply – the real source of power – DICTATE to the host nation what nation’s foreign policy will be, in their goal to have a ONE-WORLD debt-slavery system where the dumbed-down debt-slaves are human cattle to serve the parasites. deThe debt-slaves are sent into foreign wars not in the National interest, but in the interest of the debt-slave masters. Young men & women of the host nation go into these wars thinking they are fighting for “freedom” and “democracy”. They are actually fighting for debt-slavery and dictatorship – the dictatorship of their Private Central Bank debt-slave masters. (emphasis added by CBW)
Elections in the host nations become meaningless window dressing, because no candidate will ever dare address the fundamental issue of restoring the nation’s sovereignty by ABOLISHING THE VAMPIRE PRIVATE CENTRAL BANK – no candidate, that is, other than Dr. Ron Paul! (emphasis added by CBW)
The Mass Media of the host nation becomes an extension of the Private Central Bank’s lust for the blood of the host nation’s citizens. Since the Vampire Private Central Bank creates the money supply, it can quickly monopolize the host nation’s “free” press.
The Mass Media is correct about one thing: the gang-rape of Libya’s sovereignty is about freedom & democracy vs. dictatorship. As they so often do, however, the Mass Media has inverted the truth. Libya is sovereign, democratic, and free. The NATO nations with their Private Central Banks are not sovereign – they are in fact Private Central Bank DICTATORSHIPS of the NWO. Following the orders of the Vampires, the captive host nations then DICTATE to other nations that they, too, must surrender their own Sovereignty, and become members of the BIS/IMF WORLD DEBT-SLAVERY SYSTEM of  PRIVATE CENTRAL BANKS.
Thus, NON SOVEREIGN NATO DICTATORSHIPS attack SOVEREIGN DEMOCRATIC LIBYA.
Gaddafi’s Gold Dinar Plan and Libya’s Public Central Bank would have changed all that, and freed all of Africa from Private Central Banks. Ultimately, it might possibly have freed the NATO host nations from their own parasites – Vampire Private Central Banks. Gaddafi’s courage and pioneering efforts in restoring national sovereignty and making the government responsible to the people instead of to the Vampires shows what can be done. NATO terrorist attacks (Click here) will not get the Western nations out of debt – only an honest Public Central Bank – like the Bank of Libya – will.
Freedom from debt-slavery is an idea whose time has come.  (Click here) and (Here) (Source)





Tuesday, July 19, 2011

The Iceman Cometh....

As I read today's and yesterday's headlines I'm reminded of Eugene O'Neill's play The Iceman Cometh.  It's been at least 30 years since I read it and I scarcely recall the plot. However,  I do recall that the cast of characters were dark, disillusioned, and despairing. They follow the advise of their Messiah figure (a traveling salesman) and give up their empty dreams only to fall deeper into depression, despair and ruin. In fact the piped piper, traveling salesman, messiah figure is arrested in the end for murder (why on earth was I reading this in high school?).

As I watched the incredibly annoyingly infamous Quasi-Socialist Progressive Fundamentalist Racism Chaser Sheila Jackson Lee reduce the debate over the impending and perilous debt ceiling increase to a case of racial discrimination against Obama.....


I could help thinking...the iceman cometh....

Here is why....

"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can't pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government's reckless fiscal policies.  Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that the buck stops here. Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better." ~ Senator Barack Obama  (March 16,2006)

Yes, you read that correctly!!!! The words above were spoken by none other than Barack Hussein Obama!!!! I couldn't find video of the momentous proclaimation for those who will call me a liar but I found something better... the actual transcript on the Library of Congress website: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/C?r109:./temp/~r109OqI6wR page S2237.  I must concede that I never thought that anything Obama said was original, intelligent, cogent, thoughtful, insightful or accurate until I read that congressional record with my very own eyes. However, he clearly isn't thinking so lucidly these days as he is on the opposite end of the spectrum...you know the side President Bush was on in 2006. I wonder where Sheila McKinney stood on the issue on March 16, 2006? No wonder the globalist want to shut down the internet! Exposing their disgustingly debauched hypocrisy is just too easy!  Yet....The Iceman Cometh....

Charles Hugh Smith and  the video that follows provide even more reasons why I'm of the opinion that The Iceman Cometh....

The Shape of Things To Come
(July 8, 2011)


The Great Reset could take many forms. The only certain thing is that today's profound political disunity and our destabilizing financial Plutocracy will force a crisis. Yesterday I laid out why the U.S. will inevitably experience The Great Reset. What comes after that systemic devolution/crisis is unknown, but we can speculate on the shape of things to come.
Though we cannot know the outcome, we can certainbly discern the outlines of the crisis itself. These destabilizing conditions will force a crisis at some point and will be resolved one way or another:
1. Profound political disunity. As I noted in Survival+, this was a key feature of the Roman Empire in its final slide to collapse. The shared values and consensus which had held the Empire's core together dissolved, leaving petty fiefdoms to war among themselves for what power and swag remained.
Today we have several types of political disunity. Superficially, the two "political theater" wings of the Demopublicans stage a bitter partisan war over whose vision of the U.S. as a "Plutocracy, but with benefits" holds an increasingly enfeebled political power.
But this is all theater and artifice. Neither wing has any vision or values of substance; each slavshly serves their masters, the corporate cartels and financial Oligarchy, while feeding their vast constituencies in the Savior State great gobs of borrowed treasure to maintain the "Plutocracy, but with benefits."
The real disunity is between a doomed Status Quo and those willing to deal with reality. Right now those willing to deal with reality are few, but they have the distinct advantage of reality on their side, while the Status Quo has only propaganda, artifice, phony political theater and empty promises.
The disunity stems from the public's innate desire to hold onto the empty promises and cling to the hope offered by the Status Quo that these grandiose, impossible promises will be met, despite the abundant factual evidence to the contrary.
Every attempt to lead the public toward the realization that the present is unsustainable will be crushed by a frantic assault of the fiefdoms, cartels and players who will lose power and profits when the Status Quo crumbles under its own weight.
Promises always sound better than reality until a crisis punctures the promises. But the anger generated by this deflation of "too good to be true" promises threatens both rationality and stability.
2. A dearth of leadership. The weakness of what passes for "leadership" today is not just a matter of bad luck but of the corruption of politics to the point that it only attracts sycophants, moral midgets and sociopaths. It's easy to blame those attracted to the game for this, but the real cause is the American people, who reject honesty in favor of artifice and promises. The American public is child-like, self-centered, myopic, ill-informed and ultimately uncaring about anything but getting their share of the swag.
Thus anyone who promises that their share of the swag will remain untouched wins, and anyone who suggests the swag is unsustainable is rejected as "judgmental" or "negative." To the degree a nation gets the leadership it demands, then the U.S. is in trouble. We're now a nation of spoiled teens who get to elect their parents. No surprise, the 'rents who never enforce any rules, never challenge their own bosses (the kleptocrats) and who dole out the most allowance win every time.
Thus we get leaders who refuse to challenge the Financial Power Elites, cartels and fiefdoms because the Status Quo would devote all its stupendous wealth and influence to defeating a challenger, and we get leaders who refuse to be honest with the American people because that honesty is rejected as unwelcome.
Ideally, a leader persuades the public to grow up rather than pander to their basest desires, but such a leader would only have one term of office.
3. The unstable double-bind of rule by Financial Plutocracy. A funny thing happens when a nation allows itself to be ruled by kleptocrats: such rule is intrinsically destabilizing, as there is no longer any center to bind the nation together. The public sees the value system at the top is "I, Me, Mine" greed fed by complicity/corruption, and they follow suit by pursuing whatever petty frauds and corruptions are within reach: tax avoidance, cheating on entrance exams, gaming disability, lying on mortgage and job applications, and so on.
Meanwhile, the diverting of national income into a few power centers is also destabilizing, as Central Planning and Market Manipulation (TM, Federal Reserve, all rights reserved worldwide) are intrinsically unstable as price can no longer be discovered by unfettered markets. As a result, imbalances grow until some seemingly tiny incident or disruption triggers a cascading collapse.
The double-bind is two-fold: the Power Elites can't bear to part with any of their power or wealth, so their resistance guarantees systemic collapse. The political "leadership" cannot challenge the Power Elites' grip on the nation's throat because the entire Status Quo has been co-opted/sold out and is now wedded to the Oligarchy as their guarantor of financial security.
What this leads to is a Status Quo committed to a sinking ship. The very imbalances created by a Financial Elite and the enabling Central State Central Planning doom the system, but since everyone within the Status Quo depends on it for their own slice of wealth and power, then no one dares speak up in favor of reality. Complicity is the order of the day, but complicity can't stop the ship from sinking.
4. The political corruption of religion. Jesus did not say, "Go forth and lobby the Roman Senate, to make laws which impose your interpretations on others." Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.” (John 18:36)
Although it is unpopular to say so, some aspects of religion in the U.S. have been corrupted by a desire for wealth and a focus on acquiring it, and by a desire for political power masquerading as morality.
Very few (I know of none) commentators, mainstream or independent, see the potential for a Great Awakening, a spiritual, non-denominational renewal of faith not as some political force in the greasy halls of power but as a motivator of personal responsibility and resolve. I may be alone in this, but American history is replete with examples not only of political upheaval but of broad-based spiritual renewals that reject the earthly excesses in favor of a renewed moral center.
Such movements need not be associated with any one religion or denomination; they tend to be cultural in nature, drawing inspiration from religious faith but extending beyond the confines of the church.
Complicity and dependence erode the soul; political or financial "fixes" alone can't fix the rot. In a fundamentally corrupt, complicit society, rules and laws are routinely evaded, bypassed, undermined or simply ignored. Making more rules fixes nothing if the rules are merely for show, or only for the bottom 99%.
The resolution of these brewing instabilities could be orderly or disorderly. In an orderly scenario, a new Constitutional Convention is convened, and a leadership backed by an enlightened public hammers out a consensus to limit the political and financial dominance of Financial Power Elites and corporate cartels. The new consensus reorients the Central State to its original purpose of limiting predation of the citizenry by Elites and criminals, defending the nation and imposing the rule of law as defined by the Constitution. The Savior State would be dismantled in an orderly process.
In a disorderly resolution, the Status Quo and the public both refuse to deal with reality and instead cling to the Titanic, demanding magical solutions that will keep the doomed ship from sinking. There is no such magic, of course, and so the ship will go down, and disorder will reign.
It might take the shape of a financial crisis such as a devaluation or hyperinflation, or it might take a political crisis such as a "Quiet Coup" by Elites or an outbreak of resistance to the heavy-handed Central State.
At the outer boundaries of such disorder, then the nation could split apart, along the lines of the book The Nine Nations of North America, or into permutations of civil war as invisioned by author/blogger Chris Sullins in his novel series Operation SERF.
The salient feature of instability is its unpredictability. The longer the nation waits to deal with unwelcome realities, the greater the eventual destabilization. What happens as a result of that inevitable destabilization will be up to us.  (Source)









 



Saturday, May 7, 2011

How To Brainwash A Nation


From Episode Two of the film series "The Century of the Self" by Adam Curtis. The nephew of Sigmund Freud, Edward Bernays started his business life as a publicist. While still in his twenties, he was part of the propaganda effort that drove the United States into in World War I (WW I.)

He personally advised several US presidents starting with Woodrow Wilson and counseled numerous corporations and business associations. Hitler's propaganda chief and Nazi henchman Joseph Goebbels was a reader and fan of Bernay's writing in particular Bernay's book "Crystalizing Public Opinion."

In this short excerpt from Curtis's film we see one example of Bernays at work.

Bernays was one of the engineers of the Cold War. He perfected the technique of manufacturing a distant but ever-threatening enemy and then creating a constant state of fear by generating false news reports that endlessly re-stated and exagerated the threat.

The stated purpose of Bernay's methods was to give those in power greater control over what he called "the mass mind." It worked well in the 1950s and sadly, it appears to be working quite well today... but maybe not forever.

For more free films visit: http://www.BrasscheckTV.com



At my Church after the premise is made and proof given of that premise the congregation is encouraged to say SO WHAT?!!? Paul Craig Roberts, a former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal writes about the relevance in article below:

Osama bin Laden’s Useful Death

by Paul Craig Roberts

In a propaganda piece reeking of US Triumphalism, two alleged journalists, Adam Goldman and Chris Brummitt, of the Associated Press or, rather, of the White House Ministry of Truth, write, or copy off a White House or CIA press release that "Osama bin Laden, the terror mastermind killed by Navy SEALs in an intense firefight, was hunted down based on information first gleaned years ago (emphasis added) from detainees at secret CIA prison sites in Eastern Europe, officials disclosed Monday."
How many Americans will notice that the first paragraph of the "report" justifies CIA prisons and torture? Without secret prisons and torture "the terror mastermind" would still be running free, despite having died from renal failure in 2001.
How many Americans will have the wits to wonder why the "terror mastermind" – who defeated not merely the CIA and the FBI, but all 16 US intelligence agencies along with Israel’s Mossad and the intelligence services of NATO, who defeated NORAD, the National Security Council, the Pentagon and Joint Chiefs of Staff, the US Air Force, and Air Traffic Control, who caused security procedures to fail four times in US airports in one hour on the same day, who caused the state-of-the-art Pentagon air defenses to fail, and who managed to fly three airliners into three buildings with pilots who did not know how to fly – has not pulled off any other attack in almost ten years? Do Americans really believe that a government’s security system that can so totally fail when confronted with a few Saudi Arabians with box cutters can renew itself to perfection overnight?
How many Americans will notice the resurrection of the long missing bin Laden as "terror mastermind" after his displacement by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the Guantanamo prisoner who confessed to being the "mastermind of 9/11" after being water-boarded 183 times?
Americans are too busy celebrating to think, a capability that seems to have been taken out of their education.
Americans are so enthralled over the death of bin Laden that they do not wonder why information gleamed years ago would take so long to locate a person who was allegedly living in a million-dollar building equipped with all the latest communication equipment next to the Pakistani Military Academy. Allegedly, the "most wanted criminal" was not moving from hide-out to hide-out in desolate mountains, but ensconced in luxury quarters in broad daylight. Nevertheless, despite his obvious location, it took the CIA years to find him after claiming to have gained information of his whereabouts out of captives in secret prisons. This is the image of the CIA as the new Keystone Cops.
In an immediate follow-up to the announcement that the Navy SEALs and CIA mercenaries acted in an exemplary fashion following the rules of engagement while a cowardly bin Laden hid behind a woman shield when the gunfire erupted, we have from the pressitutes that "U.S. officials conceded the risk of renewed attack. The terrorists almost certainly will attempt to avenge bin Laden’s death, CIA Director Leon Panetta wrote in a memo. . . . Within a few hours, the Department of Homeland Security warned that bin Laden’s death was likely to provide motivation for attacks from ‘homegrown violent extremists’."
John Brennan, White House counter-terrorism adviser, told reporters that "it was inconceivable that the terrorist fugitive didn’t have support in Pakistan where his hideout had been custom built six years ago in a city with a heavy military presence."
So the claimed murder of bin Laden by the US in a sovereign foreign country with which the US is not at war, a crime under international law, has set up three more self-serving possibilities:
Terrorists will avenge bin Laden’s death, says the CIA, setting up another false flag attack to keep the profits flowing into the military/security complex and the power flowing into the unaccountable CIA. Homeland Security can extend the domestic police state, abuse of travelers, and arrests of war protestors. And Pakistan is under the gun of invasion and takeover (for India, of course) for shielding bin Laden.
The Israel Lobby’s representatives in the US Congress quickly fell in with the agenda. Senator Carl Levin, Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, declared that the Pakistani Army and intelligence agency "have a lot of questions to answer, given the location, the length of time and the apparent fact that this was actually – this facility was actually built for bin Laden, and its closeness to the central location of the Pakistani army."
The two reporters question nothing in the government’s propaganda. Instead, the reporters join in the celebration. Nevertheless they let slip that "officials were weighing the release of at least one photo taken of bin Laden’s body as part of what Brennan called an effort to make sure ‘nobody has any basis to try and deny the death.’"
As the Guardian and European newspapers have revealed, the photo of the dead bin Laden is a fake. As the alleged body has been dumped into the ocean, nothing remains but the word of the US government, which lied about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and al Qaeda connections, about yellowcake, about Iranian nukes, and, according to thousands of experts, about 9/11. Suddenly the government is telling us the truth about bin Laden’s death? If you believe that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn that I’ll let you have for a good price.
My initial interpretation of the faked bin Laden death was that Obama needed closure of the Afghan war and occupation in order to deal with the US budget deficit. Subsequent statements from Obama regime officials suggest that the agenda might be to give Americans a piece of war victory in order to boost their lagging enthusiasm. The military/security complex will become richer and more powerful, and Americans will be rewarded with vicarious pleasure in victory over enemies. (Source)


 

 


Monday, May 2, 2011

What We Have Here Is A Head-Fake....PROPAGANDA!!!!!



 THIS SAME PHOTO OF A DEAD OBL HAS BEEN CIRCULATED FOR OVER A YEAR!!!!!



Unplug the fan because there is just too much bull-sh*t flying around. The worst part about it is that the "sheeple" are so easily beguiled. Watching the "spontaneous" celebrations one is reminded of the winning of the super-bowl or something. My grandfather used to tell me that I see the world through rose-colored glasses -- my how times have changed. I wish I could replace the stark reality of yellow journalism, corrupt government, ill-informed, gullible, brain-dead public with a pair of rose colored glasses right about now. Here is a morning read.....

Media Runs Fake Photo To Illustrate Bin Laden Death Propaganda  

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, May 2, 2011


Killing Osama bin Laden is a pretty big deal. You’d think that it would be in the interests of US forces to take a snapshot of the elusive terror leader to milk the propaganda value of such a momentous turn of events, and yet the corporate media has given us nothing but a years old fake picture. This makes little sense, unless of course, somebody is trying to hide something, namely the fact that Osama’s dead corpse has been on ice for the best part of a decade.
According to some reports, Bin Laden’s body has already been hastily “buried at sea,” meaning that the comic book story of his dramatic killing is based solely on the less than credible word of the U.S. government.
Of course, it’s probable that we’ll be treated to seeing all the gory details in due course once Osama’s corpse has been properly thawed and suitably presented for public consumption.
But the fake photo, which is still being used by the likes of the Daily Mail and the London Telegraph even after it was proven to be a contrived hoax that has been circulating on the Internet for years, fits perfectly with everything surrounding the Bin Laden myth – the fake video tapes, the fake audio tapes, the fake claim of responsibility for 9/11.
Everything about the Bin Laden myth that has been rapaciously whipped up by the establishment over the last 10 years has been fake, so why worry about putting out a fake photo and claiming it represents the freshly dead remains of the world’s most wanted?
We don’t need MSNC to tell us, “We think that bin Laden ‘death photo’ is a fake,” because we know it’s a fake. It’s been knocking around on the web since before Obama even took office. Here it is featured in a story released over a year ago. As Stokes Young illustrates, the bloodied face of Bin Laden is an obviously contrived composite image created from an image of Osama that dates back over 10 years.
But that didn’t stop TV news stations across the Middle East, as well as major newspapers in Britain like the Daily Mail and the London Telegraph, amongst a host of others, from passing the fraud off as evidence of Bin Laden’s death.

Despite the fact that Bin Laden’s corpse has almost undoubtedly been safely stored in a highly secure U.S. government morgue since at least 2002, the political grist to be enjoyed by an administration that has plummeted to the depths of unpopularity knows no bounds, which is why Obama victoriously proclaimed Osama’s “death ” during a speech last night almost as if the president himself had pulled the trigger.
The birther controversy and NATO’s indiscriminate murder of children in their pursuit of Colonel Gaddafi will now be swept under the rug and Obama can build his campaign for 2012 on the lie that he was the president who finally brought the evil boogeyman to justice.
Never mind the fact that numerous public officials went on the record to plainly state that Bin Laden has been dead for years and that the announcement of his demise was being kept back until the most politically expedient time.
As Kurt Nimmo and Alex Jones document, from FBI counterterrorism official Dale Watson, to former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, to Pakistani icon Benazir Bhutto, to CFR members, to Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, all voiced publicly what the evidence clearly indicated, which is that Bin Laden died in late 2001.
The fact that a deluge of provably fake video and audio tapes were released by an organization with direct ties to the Pentagon in the years that followed illustrated how the military-industrial complex was keen to prolong the Bin Laden boogeyman myth as a backdrop against which to launch their takeover of the middle east under the umbrella of the “war on terror”.
But don’t think for a minute that final “confirmation” of Osama’s death will mean an end to the “war on terror” and U.S. troops pulling out of Afghanistan, just as the capture of Saddam Hussein did absolutely nothing to speed a U.S. exit out of Iraq.
If anything, the announcement of Osama’s death will only lead to more warfare and bloodshed in the region. Whether genuine or contrived, terrorist retaliation plots are already in the works and when they are unleashed, the establishment will point to them as a justification for more air strikes, more invasions and more regime change plots disguised as humanitarian aid.
In life, Bin Laden’s propaganda value as an Emmanuel Goldstein hate figure was immense, but in death his usefulness to the US military-industrial complex will, for a time at least, only increase.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show.


P.S - I don't think this is a coincidence that this was announced on May 1st (May Day). Stay tuned....I've got a little researching to do.

More Reads:
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/osama_dead.php
http://denmarkvesey.blogspot.com/2011/05/obama-bin-lyin-introduction-to-hegelian.html
http://youtu.be/jiuaFdaOnRk

Sunday, May 1, 2011

Response to Jina a Black Quasi-Socialist Progressive-Fundamentalist Racism Chaser...

I received the comment below from a reader in response to the blog post Thank You Mr. President For Finally Releasing Your Long Form Birth Certificate:
Wow...you are a pathetic idiot. This man has nothing to hide. The only reason he waited so long was not to legitimize people who tried to claim he wasn't a real American. The funny thing is that with all the documents and witnesses Obama will be able to get, there are still many in this world who will not believe he is a true American because at the end of the day he is black.

Bottom line, if his mother is a U.S citizen and he was born in the U.S, he is a U.S citizen. You are legitimizing the claims of people who would never vouch for your BLACK @$$ boo boo. Unfortunately this is not your cause. Are you one of those idiots who believe that a man who graduated in the top 5% of his class at Harvard didn't deserve to be there too? If you were a truly educated women you would have already had some form of experience with the above mention racism in college or high school. And please don't tell me that you're one of those blacks that decry Affirmative Action.

It's a shame that we have so many black people criticizing a black person who is trying to do positive things. Please don't start saying race doesn't matter and I'll vote and think w/o race in mind, because at the end of the day this affects you and your children. It is disadvantageous for you as a black woman not consider race, because at the end of the day most people will consider race when they consider you.

How the black community reacts to Pres.Barack Obama affects how much the larger community feels they can REVEAL about how they feel about Obama. It would be nice to live in a world where blacks could be differentiated, but that is sadly not the case, and the success of this presidency has implications for the obstacles faced in front of blacks in the generations to come.

People complain, but overall if you were to list everything he has done over these few years you would see a very massive list with practically everything he had promised to do. Don't project your hate and issues with black men and women on our president. Get over your daddy issues see things objectively.

I suspect that you are one of those blacks that felt they never meshed with blacks around them. And you've decided to mesh with a group of whites within an ideology that uses you as little more than a tool and a puppet, that would have little use for you if we didn't have a black president or you were no longer willing to stick to the script(i.e. Michael Steele). Whites love a good black-on-black squabble, and you are really pleasing them right now."
April 30, 2011 10:34 AM
Because I don't have time to respond individually to the same indictments and because my response was too long for the comment section of my blog, I'm posting my response here. So I invite all of you Obama Lovin' folks to read this and think twice before wasting your time and mine with inane ad hominem attacks.  


^@Jina~Please know that I am exercising every ounce of restraint I can't muster to refrain from acting like you -- A COMPLETE FOOL & verbally\digitally assassinating your black posterior.

I find it fascinating how you conclude that I'm a pathetic idiot because I don't pledge blind allegiance to Obama because he is a black(ish) man. This speaks more to your low frequency of intellectual activity than it does to mine. Not one of you Black Quasi-Socialist Progressive-Fundamentalist Racism Chasers who have commented in this tread has dared address the posted article -- Why is that? Because your are just plain dense!!! Cognitively dissonant is what you are. You write: "It's a shame that we have so many black people criticizing a black person who is trying to do positive things.
Really? Like what? Please expound on this for me? As far as I can tell he is like Bush on steroids. I'm honestly confounded as to why Republicans don't love this blood thirsty war monger. 
You also write:"Bottom line, if his mother is a U.S citizen and he was born in the U.S, he is a U.S citizen." You couldn't be more wrong. First of all "Boo-Boo"  (isn't that what you called me?)the fool, there is a difference between a Natural Born Citizen and a Naturalized citizen. If you had read the article or gleened any intelligence other than the Tom Joyner Morning Show or The Steve Harvey Show you would know this (dumb ass). Obama touts that he is a Constitutional scholar and as such surely he was aware that because of Article II, Section I, Paragraph 5 (Presidential Clause)of the Constitution his eligibility would be questioned. Why, because the definition of Natural Born Citizen is obscure. Secondly, your "positive" president was adopted as a minor by Lolo Sotero (which is why he went by the name of Barry Sotero)and there was no dual citizenship allowed in Indonesia at the time that he moved there. As I mention in the blog post which you clearly didn't read, a parent can't terminate the citizenship of a minor but this still doesn't hold mustard because
the Nationality Act of 1940, revised 1952, Section 318(a) states, “A former citizen of the United States expatriated through the expatriation of such person’s parent or parents and who has not acquired the nationality of another country by any affirmative act other than the expatriation of his parent or parents may be naturalized upon filing a petition for naturalization before reaching age of Twenty-Five [25] years and upon compliance with all requirements of the naturalization laws with the following exceptions:  (b) No former citizen of the United States, expatriated through the expatriation of such person’s parent or parents shall be obliged to comply with the requirements of the immigration laws, if he has not acquired the nationality of another country by any affirmative act other than the expatriation of his parent or parents, and if he has come or shall come to the United States before reaching the age of twenty-five years. (c) After his naturalization such person shall have the same citizenship status as if he had not been expatriated.”
Well guess what? Your black(ish) president renewed his Indonesian Passport after the age of 18 which is an affirmative act, as he had to swear allegiance to another Country (Indonesia) in order to obtained the renew passport.  Obama renewed his Indonesian Passport when he traveled to Pakistan that is why he had to stop in Indonesia first.  Remember, in 1981, his White mama (funny how you racism chasers keep forgetting that he had one of those) was divorcing Soetoro in Hawaii and was not in Indonesia.  Obama admits to traveling to Indonesia first and then onto Pakistan.  Obama claims in his book Dreams from My Father that he stopped in Indonesia to visit his mother.  But again, his mother was not in Indonesia, she was in Hawaii  divorcing Lolo Soetoro (see her passport records courtesy of your stupid compatriot "Old School Oldies" who thought she was "educating me" by posting a link to it in the comment tread....lol)  In addition, the State Department has stated in response to a FOIA [Freedom of Information] request that they do not have a U.S. Passport application on file for Barack H. Obama.” So your Boi is a liar!!!

So, Jina before you come on this tread and try to indict me -- Get your damn facts straight!!! Ok?

Finally and for the record -- I have no "Daddy" issues. Don't project the dysfunction of your personal life onto me. Neither do I seek knowledge and truth for the benefit of "white people love". I have an incredibly loving family (all of whom are black) and it is their love and approval that matters to me. In fact, it is precisely because of this love and support that I don't have to pledge blind allegiance to dishonorable, deceitful, dishonest, evasive, fork-tongued, rogue black politicians and most especially black(ish) politicians simply because they are black or black(ish). I am free enough and secure enough in my person to evaluate people on the content of their character. Hopefully, one day you will be woman enough to do the same.

P.S. I forgot about this little comment of yours"Are you one of those idiots who believe that a man who graduated in the top 5% of his class at Harvard didn't deserve to be there too? No, I'm an informed free opinionated conservative black woman, mother, wife, daughter (of two parents who lived together in the same home until death parted them) who believes Obama when he says “The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide”. He hasn't released his academic records, so I ask you Einstien --What's he hiding? I'm old enough to know Cupcake that there is entirely too much smoke (and mirrors) around this man for there to be no fire.

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Thank You Mr. President For Finally Releasing Your Long Form Birth Certificate

President Obama finally released his long-form birth certificate this morning. I can't help wondering why he spent millions of  taxpayers dollars to suppress it in the first place. Neither can I fathom why his passport records, international travel documentation  and academic records are sealed. I believe with every fiber of my being that he has something to hide.

I have always maintained that whether or not he was born in this Hawaii, he is Constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of  POTUS because he was adopted by Lolo Soetero and moved to Indonesia in 1967 at a time when there was no dual citizenship. Therefore upon his return to the US he would be a Naturalized citizen and not a natural born citizen at that point. However, I have since learned that a parent can not renounce the U.S. Citizenship of a minor child under Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). So, there goes that theory.  Now I can only say that if the document released is authentic (which I doubt) what was the big deal in the first place? Why did he wait so long? And, when will we see his passport? How was he able to go to Pakistan in 1981 when Americans were prohibited from traveling there unless he went as a citizen of Indonesia?

Nonetheless, on the birth certificate Obama's father is listed as "African" (I question why in 1961 it wouldn't read negro or black) and this does not help plead the case for his eligibility if we consider the definition of "Natural Born" citizen. The article below explains:



The Definition of a Birther
By
Leo Patrick Haffey


© January 1, 2011

"Be not afraid of greatness; some are born great, some achieve greatness, and others have greatness thrust upon them." William Shakespeare

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." Abraham Lincoln

The definition of a birther is: Birther--noun--a person who believes - against evidence - that Barack Obama was born outside of the United States.
By definition I am not a birther. I do not believe or disbelieve that Barack Hussein Obama Jr. was born outside of the United States. I readily admit that I do not know where BHO Jr. was born. However, both BHO Jr. and his closest family friends like Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie vociferously allege that BHO Jr. was born in Hawaii to Barack Hussein Obama Sr. and Stanley Ann Dunham.

If we take BHO Jr. at his word then there is no doubt that he is not a Natural Born Citizen of the United States as required by the Presidential Qualifications Clause of Article II Section 1 Paragraph 5 of the United States Constitution. The Constitution requires that to be the President of the United States, a person must be born in the United States of two parents who are citizens of the United States. By BHO Junior’s own admission his father was a British/Kenyan subject (citizen) at the time of his birth. Thus BHO Jr. is disqualified for the Presidency. (emphasis added by CBW)

There is a clear, concise definition of the term "Natural Born Citizen" in Vattel's Law of Nations which was the principal legal reference book used by the Founding Fathers in writing the Constitution.

"The natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens...it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country."
There have been innumerable United States Supreme Court Decisions that have referenced Vattel’s Law of Nations as a resource in interpreting the original intent of the Founding Fathers when writing the Constitution.

The following are a few of the cases that have reiterated Vattel’s definition of the meaning of the term, Natural Born Citizen.

In the Venus Case, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814), Justice Livingston, who wrote the unanimous decision, quoted the entire §212 paragraph from the French edition of Vattel’s Law of Nations:
"Vattel who…is more explicit and more satisfactory on it than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, says:
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives (natural born citizens) or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens. Society not being able to subsist and to perpetuate itself but by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.

The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are strangers who are permitted to settle and stay in the country. Bound by their residence to the society, they are subject to the laws of the state while they reside there, and they are obliged to defend it…"
Justice Story ruled in Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830), ‘If she was not of age, then she might well be deemed under the circumstances of this case to hold the citizenship of her father, for children born in a country, continuing while under age in the family of the father, partake of his national character as a citizen of that country. Her citizenship, then, being prima facie established, and indeed this is admitted in the pleadings…"

In Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875), Chief Justice Morrison Waite delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court, "The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."

Justice Gray ruled in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), "At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."

A reading of the above referenced United States Supreme Court Cases coupled with a reading of Vattel’s clear and concise definition of a Natural Born Citizen in his monumental work, Law of Nations, leaves no doubt that Barack Hussein Obama Jr. is not constitutionally qualified to be the President of the United States of America.
Unfortunately for all Americans, the Supreme Court of the United States of America has yet to rule on the definition of a Natural Born Citizen as it pertains to the Presidency of the United States. It is not as some say that the Supreme Court has heretofore evaded or avoided the opportunity to achieve greatness and rule on this most profound constitutional issue of first impression. Rather it is that no Justices in the history of American jurisprudence have had this momentous fate thrust upon them. As always, I have an unvanquished trust that these "just" men and women will seize the fate before them and make an everlasting first and foremost impression on the future of the Greatest Nation in the History of Mankind.

References:

http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/

http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/05/aka-obama-ineligible-if-he-was-born-on.html

http://standupamericaus.com/our-privilege-our-right-and-our-duty-civilian-grand-jury:33320


http://onlineslangdictionary.com/definition+of/birther

© January 1, 2011 by Leo Patrick HaffeyLeo Patrick Haffey is a lawyer in Nashville, Tennessee who has worked in the music, motion picture and television industries as a producer. Mr. Haffey’s productions have been broadcast on most of the major television networks. Mr. Haffey has done extensive legal research on the Constitution, in particular the Constitutional qualifications for the Presidency of the United States of America.

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

The Truth May Make You Free, But It Sure As Hell Hurts


I just read an article on the lack of looting in Japan. The comment thread that followed mostly supported the premise that looting is a black and minority phenomena as evidenced in Haiti, South Central, and New Orleans. Just as I was considering an attempt to debunk this notion by scouring the net to find incidents of white folks lootin', I read this comment by some guy named Dave -- "Choosing to believe something that you suspect is a lie makes you a fool. Defending something you know is a lie makes you deceptive and immoral. Creating the lie proves that you are evil!" I'm no fool, neither am I deceptive, immoral or evil so I'll just stand on truth. Looting is yet another symptom of "black pathology" that we need to root out of our collective consciousness. What say you?

Monday, April 4, 2011

Alan Watt: Reality Check (Part 1)

"Bringing you the Story behind the Story, the News behind the News. Hoping to convince you that reality is usually scoffed at and illusion is usually king, but in the battle for the survival of Western civilization it will be reality and not illusion or delusion that will determine what the future will bring." - Dr. Stanley Monteith

I had a long conversation today with a beloved family member this evening hoping to convince him that there are hidden forces behind the presumed  "reality" we have been conditioned to believe are real since our birth. I shared with him that we are in a sense programmed to believe that revolutions, terrorism and wars are just unrelated, unplanned organic happenstance, mere coincidences. We are encouraged not to think too deeply about these matters and in fact waste no mental energy thinking about them at all beyond what we hear on the evening news  (CNN or Fox if we really deem ourselves intellectuals).

We are encouraged to focus our attention on the NCAA tournaments, rankings and blocks -- because that makes for polite and lively conversation. Should we find a quiet spot in the family room and begin to discuss what Dr. Stanley  Montheith describes as the "story behind the story"  then we are scolded for being too serious about that which we have no control over because "God is in control".  Well, I don't doubt that but does God want us ignorant,apathetic, and beguiled by mainstream propaganda? I didn't dare say that because I wasn't in the mood to get a beatdown from the "Deaconesses" in my clan. So, we moved our discussion out to my car and I think I may have planted a seed. I remembered a talk given by Alan Watt that I was enlightened by a few years ago and decided to post it here with the hope that my beloved cousin will continue his quest for the story behind the story, news behind the news and reality rather that illusion and delusion.   We are absolutely fast approaching a system of neo-feudalist control.....




I respect Alan Watt immensely, but it's much easier to read his words than that to listen to him so please find transcription below:

Transcription of Video

Alan Watt: Hi. I'm Alan Watt and some of you have heard me on radio broadcasts going back to '98 on the "Sweet Liberty" broadcast and short-wave radio. Jackie Patru was the host and we still do an occasional Wednesday night on Internet only this time, and we have been for the last year or so.
On these programs, we've discussed the histories of mind control basically. We've gone through the histories of ancient religions, how they started up with civilizations, and the meaning of civilization. The money system which is part and parcel with religion in the system called civilization. The techniques to control the peoples, which haven't really changed that much. The same techniques are used, only on a much larger scale, plus they have children in school to start the indoctrination process early into giving them a type of version of reality, of which, generally, they will never question their whole life long. THEY ACCEPT THE WORLD AS IT'S BEEN PRESENTED TO THEM.
Many, many thousands of years ago, civilizations rose and fell; and really, by “civilization,” we're talking about the creation of "artificial systems." Money, of course, is an unnatural thing to use for barter.  It's of no use in itself.  It's supposedly a tool. That's how it's pushed over through economics; it's a tool which helps barter. It's helps barter, you see, by using a third party; and of course, those who introduce the money ultimately control those who barter and those who buy.
From money, of course, they build cities. Cities are an artificial hive - a "beehive" as Plato called them; and through cities, these civilizations really are one civilization under many faces. Through the cities, they could - because they must use money in a city and they can't draw anything in a city. They can't feed themselves. They're totally artificial. A culture which is fluid and flexible is not a natural thing. At least we don't know what natural culture ever was, but it's definitely flexible and pliable, and is a science in culture creation, is still ongoing. Those who know how to manipulate it and to start in the cities, where, once they have money on the go and they've trained the people outside to accept money for their food products and so on, they then build standing army from within the city.  With the standing army they go outside the city and conquer other peoples—force them into the system.
Force them to use money. Give them a religion and really THEY'RE REALLY SLAVES.   Charles Galton Darwin (the grandson of Charles Darwin) said, "every civilization has really been a form of slavery for the people," and he was all for it. That was a NATURAL ORDER according to him; and of course, those who are trained in power and control of the people are trained in this technique since birth.
They're brought up listening to a different version of reality than someone brought up in a local housing area. They're told that the realities of life, the predators should be at the top the natural order. They're predators of course, because they're such hypocrites. As good predators, they can't tell the children how they're really feeding off them or manipulating them for different ends, because children don't understand these things. Those with the low IQ's, you know the little people at the bottom of the hill, you've got to keep them in the dark, the profane.
PROFANE in Masonry means "those in the darkness," base people, which is a real hypocrisy in itself, because it's like breaking the legs of cow and then kicking the cow because they can't get up. That's the hypocrisy of this system and that's how they view the public. They've broken our legs and they hate us because we can't get up. We're pathetic; and of course, they claim that we need them. It's like saying that the mice in the fields need the hawk. THIS IS THE LOGIC OF THE PREDATOR.
From the days of Babylon and then before Babylon, they called them the Harappans. This is the name that's been stuck on these people by historians, just to give them a name, but the Harappan culture extended all the way from Egypt right through the Middle East to China.  Now they're unearthing pre-Sumerian Harappan cities on trade routes; and of course they must use the money system to live that very high standard of living, these merchants, and they even had in-door plumbing.  Something that some people today don't have even in Canada and some places.
If you go into the Minoan cultures, you'll find the Minoan's in the Aegean Sea controlled all the trade routes. They controlled all the merchandising on the sea, land and everything.  They also had in-door plumbing and central heating, even, and hot water for bathing in and showers and they lived, I assume, a beautiful lifestyle. They had painted frescos in every room, hand painted and it was just a wonderful existence for this high ancient elite, who obviously didn't create the culture themselves or the system.
They had got it from a previous civilization in turn; and so it comes to this empire, so we're looking at people down through the ages who are intergenerational and who pass their system on to the next.  Now of course that does seem to be what this is all about, because DYNASTIES AND POWER NEVER GIVE UP POWER. When they do move, because it was their turn to lose in warfare, because they have turns, you see. War is to create change and to make profit, not for what the public thinks it's for.
Sometimes the ones who decide “we'll lose this time,” they will actually move to, generally, their enemy’s camp, which is their friends, and share the loot and bring up their children and slap the name of the country on them; and they don't care what they call the country.
THE ELITE NEVER, EVER GET MASSACRED OR WIPED OUT with their wealth. They just move. They move, all down through the ages. They bring on catastrophes to an empire when they've used that empire up and they've already created another one to move into and then they flatten the old one and move on.  This has been the system for thousands and thousands of years at least.
The trick of Darwin was to make you think we just evolved in 200,000 BC and before that, he even said 10,000 BC, which is rubbish. This whole evolution thing is actually a Masonic doctrine. It's nothing to do with what we think it's meant to be. It's a Masonic doctrine.  Darwin just was pulled out of the hat by the Royal Society, which was a Masonic scientific establishment chartered by the British Crown to exist.  He basically gave the "Origin of the Species" et cetera to justify the right of certain types to rule; and he wasn't talking about other animals or animals. He was talking about themselves over us. Evolution is a caste system.  It's to verify a caste system, to reinforce it and of course, it's worked very well up until now.
Going back to the Minoan's, we know they also shared and they were probably very much so a part of the ancient Egyptian elite, because the frescos on their walls have the same imageries, styles, techniques used as you'll see in the frescos inside some of the tombs inside-in Egypt.  They even had the little curls down at the front locks of the youth that they used to depict youth in Egypt.
Yes, they make perfect sense. A real elite wouldn't live in a place where they could be easily attacked. They would have a front—an empire or a city and come in and out of it certainly, but they would also have somewhere safe, such as in the middle of the Aegean Sea.  We know, for instance, that in a circle in the Aegean Sea of little islands, which are left after a volcano goes down, they had that huge island there at one time.  Islands like Thera are the remains from when the tropic volcano sinks into the ocean, so these little fringe ones remain and become separate little islands; and that's where we get much of the Minoan history from.
Interesting, the Minoan's used a double-headed axe in their religious ceremonies, the symbol of the fascia, which is from down through the ages.  We're looking at something the Catholic Church used afterwards, thousands of years later.   Minoan's were around 5,000 to 6,000 BC and here is the same symbology used by their own Catholic church, who simply inherited their culture from the Greeks who moved into Rome. The elite, that is, of course, and brought all this symbology with them.
The Greeks got it from the Minoan's.  This is an endless stream of symbology, down through the ages, of language, you might say, which they understand very well; and which some very high Masons understand; and which some people, who are natural adepts, can figure out themselves, but there’s not [many] of them.  The Catholic Church used this Minoan fascia of the axe with the bundle of rods around it, meaning, "strength was in numbers." When you get one twig you can break it easily, but you get a whole bunch of them in a bundle and try to break it in one go, it's harder; and so the nobility-the ruling elite must stick together at all costs, you see. In the middle of the bundle is the main shaft of the fascia—the actual axe itself.
This is also in the Senate in the Congressional Hall in the U.S., where Mr. Bush now gives his speeches and every other one before him has.
On either side, you'll see the fascia symbols or system, often elite, encircling the center shaft and they're all tied together. They're bound together by oaths, you see, in blood and money and so on—and their own secret religion.  Yes, we're creating a system going back way, way back into the mists of time. Civilization to the elite is that which is ABNORMAL.
They create the ABNORMAL. They are the deviants so they create the ABNORMAL. Nothing normal can come out of deviancy. That makes sense.
You've got an artificial system which "CONNED". The word CON, COHEN, CAIN, KAHN, KING all comes from the same root of PRIEST. They conned people to use money and then of course they could create their cities. Hire people for a standing army. You can't get a bunch of guys together to go and conquer anybody if you don't have some means of keeping them there—some kind of a reward. They'll just go home eventually, get bored and fed up.
Money is always the key to this civilization, this building process: building of cities, empires, society itself.  Freemasons like Albert Pike and Mackey and a whole bunch of other ones are always extolling their own virtues of being able to build society, build culture.  In the Middle Ages, where they built their cathedrals and their big huge churches and so on, they'd often build them either next to or on top of existing ones; and so, as they're building new one, they're demolishing the old. The old age, the system is buried and demolished as they're building up the new one.
We have an elite who've used war, money, cities, culture creation, religion and all the things that come into the culture festivals, generally based on lunar and solar and stellar mythologies, to keep the people in check. Keep them happy, dumbed-down, stupid and obedient more than anything else, because obedience is so important.   Of course, the sun god was one of the greatest ones they've used down through the ages up until the present; and it's a reincarnated sun god. You see, it's the same old thing rehashed over and over where the invisible god, the "Grand Architect of the Universe," as the Masons call him, always chooses a son—his own son to push life into the world, because they claim that without it, we the profane are dead, you see.
In a sense, they're right because if you don't know reality, you are dead; because living as a human means you're a sentient, aware, fully conscious being.  You'll find in all religions they have the same terminology.  You find it in Christianity, too, where Jesus says to the guy, "let the dead bury their dead," and ministers don't dwell on that because they can't really fathom it out. How can those that are walking around bury the dead? It's because life doesn't mean you're animated, which is the big con today. Everybody's rushing around in their cars as fast as they can go and they think they're living because they keep moving and they don't do shopping lists anymore. They've got to just keep moving and have noise blaring all the time, and music playing or something, you see, because they're scared to think.

Those who do not think for themselves are classified as the DEAD, in all ages. George Orwell used that even in his "1984" book, where Winston and his girlfriend are caught by the thought police before being taken to the Ministry of Love—for torture.  That's what he says when they're first caught, "we are the dead."  That's a little Masonic giveaway, meaning that if they had been really alive, they would have never been caught like this.
Of course, there are many, many degrees of waking up from the dead.  In Freemasonry they have a substitute a bunch of rungs on a ladder, called degrees, for the idiots who join it at the bottom to get up, thinking that one day they're going to get hit the big magic number and they're going to be a full-fledged high Chutzpah, you see, and they get virtue. Virtue, right? They're taught virtue.
All these drunkards and guys who've done everything everybody else has done suddenly have virtue.  They think, “oh my goodness, I'm a 32nd Degree Mason of the Scottish Rite and I am illumined and I've got virtue. I've got virtue,” as they cross their palms with silver in their handshakes and pay each other off, you see, and take all the freebees from the society to live on. You know, cheaper taxation assessments with a nudge, a wink, a nod and a handshake to the assessor; and the same thing with the policeman that catches them speeding. “Is there no one to help a poor widow's son?” Why is that? Why?
You get all this rubbish you see.  These guys are just bottom feeders. They're low-end predators, because who else would join a “society with secrets,” as they call themselves, without knowing what it's all about? All they know is what the Masons make sure that everyone's always known. “If you join us, you get up the ladder in life. You get little special favors.”
This is the rubbish you see that goes into Freemasonry. They're low-level bottom feeders, because they want all the little freebees and it doesn't matter to them if their neighbor, who's a profane one—now this guy who's exactly the same as them is now profane.  If he gets a bigger tax assessment and he has to pay his speeding charges and so on, it doesn't matter to him, this guy's suffering while he's not. That's the Masonic Creed. It's a ‘scratch my back and I'll scratch yours’ dogma.
Of course it doesn't stop there because a circle is 360 degrees.  These are the prunes that don't go up terribly high, especially first generation Masons, because there's also a breeding program involved.  They can trace us back down, again, way back to Sumer and so on of intergenerational breeding and selective breeding. Don't let Darwin think that he came up with this idea himself.
In fact, you'll find it today in history, his grandfather had already written a book about it long before he did; and there's a Masonic dogma he's preaching: the right to rule by an elite. A superior intellectual elite who are not afraid to use aggression and kill if need be. Always for your own sake, you understand. That's a good predatory excuse, but somehow they can rationalize that; but then, we are the children and what do we know? You can't scare the children by telling them the truth; and in a sense, at the stage we're at today, that is true. In a sense, it's very true. The children don't want to hear it.

You've got an endless seam of merchandising, money lending, interest gathering priesthoods going down through the thousands and thousands of years, and intergenerational families who are taught a different reality than the ones at the bottom. They go to the little red schoolhouses. In Britain, it's little red-brick schoolhouses, as the elite refer to them. Of course, their universities are also granite stone, whereas the ordinary muck can go to the red-bricked universities.
Margaret Thatcher, back in the early '80s, came under fire, in a sense (if that's possible) for subsidizing private schooling for the wealthy, using tax money to subsidize the wealthy.  She rationalized it by telling the truth, as they very often do.  She said, “This is where your future leaders are coming from. Your future industrial leaders, political leaders, economists and so on, they come from these schools and this is where they meet each other. They'll grow up in life knowing each other and they'll all be in the right positions.  She was telling the truth, so there's nothing strange about that. They do tell the truth very often.

It's the public, when they hear it, they say, “I know I heard that, but they can't really mean what they say.”  The public were trained this way, you see. You train the abused to love the abuser. The public can't quite fathom this and so they make excuses for them: “I guess she had a bad day to say what she said,” or, “The problems that she's got on her plate, I don't blame her.” You see this is the rationale.
An intergenerational elite with many priesthoods in Sumer had so many priesthoods dealing with the legal system and real estate and subdivisions of real estate and wills, death duties and taxes and so on—everything that bureaucracies do today. Some of them change their clothing. They wear suits and ties today or white coats like scientists.
This system has gone down through the ages always taking themselves to another place and destroying that which was left behind them, yet leaving it in such a way—leaving some low level controllers there to make sure it's standardized. That way when you get a bigger empire over here, they can then lump this back into it again, the old one; so they create bigger and bigger empires.  This is part of the “great work,” as they call it. They claimed again, 4,500 BC, "The Big Idea," as Mr. George Bush, Sr. called it: "The Big Idea." The BB—TO BE OR NOT TO BE, says Shakespeare, for those who know.
On we go, down through the ages, until we see their target in sight; and they've told us, the age you see of Aquarius. There's many reasons for Aquarius being Aquarius. First off, even in the New Testament, because Jesus was the sign of Pisces, a fish—Fisherman of men. The first guys he recruits were fisherman, the philosopher king, Pythagoras type of thing. The Electi used the fish symbol wherever they went as a sign of Christianity, before they used the cross; and in fact, the cross was used for the inner sect because there's always an exoteric for the public and a real meaning for the initiates.
The cross was always used as a symbol of the sun, but the fish, of course, was for the public - for the profane. Aquarius has ruled for over 2,000-odd years and now we're going to Aquarius.
In the New Testament they have Jesus saying, going into town and you see a guy carrying a picture of water (which is Aquarius of course) and you borrow his coat.  Then you see right in there they give you the clue that this would be the time for the next coming of man, the new type.
The age in Aquarius of peace and understanding. Peace is not peace as you know it. Peace comes when there's absence of consciousness and opposition to this agenda. That's what they mean by peace.  Peace comes when there's not enough of you to cause trouble and those that are left don't have a functioning brain to use. That's peace, hence the rush towards chips and chipping the brain and implants and stuff like that, and a totally controlled society.
They want peace. They don't want to give us all this media nonsense—this constant propaganda to keep us running in circles and chewing the grass like good little sheep.  It takes away from their profits, because they want pure profit, you see. They want 100% profit from us; and they've got to allow us to entertain ourselves, to keep us obedient and grazing and sports and circuses and all that kind of thing you see, and buying toys, junk from China. The rewards - little Pavlovian rewards at the end of the month.
That's all taken from their ultimate profit and that upsets them because it's not efficient enough.  THIS SYSTEM THAT'S COMING INTO BEING—THEY WANT COMPLETE UTTER EFFICIENCY WHERE A PERSON WILL NOT BE BORN UNLESS THEY HAVE A WORK FOR YOU TO DO.
Otherwise, you can sell your body parts as an inducement and get some profit from investment.  We've gone down through a horror show, down through the ages of watching people being oppressed. Doing what they do naturally, which is to resist, so you have force; and for every force, there's an equal and opposite reaction. Then, of course, then they control the conflict to bring it the conclusion, the synthesis of it all; and before you know it, we've just moved into where they want us to go.
WE ARE THE SHEEP.  They are the GOOD SHEPHERDS. Good shepherds pat the sheep. They know them by name. The sheep come up to them and like them because sheep don't know what they're there for. They think that they're there to be happy. They don't know - they don't even ask, “why does the Shepherd spend so much taking care of us and talking to us?”—That's because the sheep don't know what they're there for. They don't know their function is to feed the Shepherd. Make a profit as they take the wool and fleece them, you see—that's a good shepherd.
A bad shepherd sharpens the knives in front of the sheep and slaughters one—the rest of them are terrified. They run off when they see them. The good shepherd wears a suit and tie and says, “I promise to help you.”   Whatever category you put yourself into, which are pigeon-holes—ready made pigeon-holes you put yourself. I'm left wing. I'm right wing. I'm up. I'm down. Whatever it was. It's their system and they lead you to where they want you to go, which is the Abattoir; but you're not supposed to know that until it happens. Poor things. You don't frighten the children.
Therefore, you tell them what they call in Masonry the NOBLE LIE.  They give us noble lies all the time, “We can't tell the people the truth, poor things, they wouldn't understand.”  They've had debates down through the thousands of years and many of them need it for work, of course, when they needed lots of labor they bred them up until they procreate, multiply and so on, and they did. They slaved away quite willingly for their masters.  When there's too many of them, the elite would get together and say lets have a war and cull some off, and they do that too.  Since really the 1500’s, when the Rosicrucian movement broke into the surface openly, in England, that's when the real push was on for now a more expert run society.
In the 1700’s, it really took off with all the different writers amongst the interbred elite, like Charles Darwin. Charles Darwin's family only interbred with one other family for generations and that was the Wedgwood family, the famous pottery Wedgwood’s of England, and his grandfather married one. This father married one. Charles married one and then when his wife died, he married his mother's sister, another Wedgwood.  They're all Wedgwood’s and Darwin's all mixed together, you see, until they bring some other outside blood—to Galton's, another sweet bunch who believed in population reduction.  They end up with, or Charles did, anyway, had ten children from his first wife and even died in childbirth or two died in insane asylums very young. Too interbred, you see.
That's part of the program initiated by the elite through Rosicrucianism, when they had to build up a middle class to manage what was coming, the industrial era, needing a middle class of obedient middle class people, who would in turn look down their noses at the people they just left at the bottom of the heap. The middle classes would become very snobbish. They had their own version of Masonry. Not a noble order like the elite had. They had a version which they didn't know there was anything else except the one they joined. They thought this was, “I've made it. I'm finally up the mountain.”
This con-game's gone on and on and on.  Of course in the 1700’s, with the French Revolution we see it coming to a new open dimension, what you see is it opening up where they actually killed off (during the revolution) thousands and thousands of ordinary French peasants.   It wasn't just the elite they were going after, they wanted to cull off what they thought was excess population in the provinces of France.  They towed them out in barges and blew them up, and stuff like that. Very sweet, and this was their idea of a scientifically run society by an intellectual elite, and this has gone right on until today.
We are now run by so many bureaucracies and expert NGO groups that speak for us, even though we don't know who they are. This is who's running the world today. A world run by the "Natural Order," they call it, just the intellectual elite, those who have proven, as H.G. Wells said, they have proven to history and to the wealthier families have accumulated for centuries that they are the natural elite. They have the right to control the lesser, you see, those in profane, those guys at the bottom of the hill there. You know, the guys that Moses left behind.
That's the story about Moses, of course. MOSES WASN'T A REAL PERSON. It was a myth that was born from Egypt and before that from India.  It's nothing to do with a person as such or a wandering captive people. It's the "Natural Order," according to the mystery religion, because the so-called Israelites, who had been slaves, were still slaves, were still base people.  In the story, which is exoteric and esoteric, they're down at the bottom of the mountain and it's lightning and thunder going around there, so they can't get up. They can't follow Moses up the mountain, because only the illuminant man, you see—the illuminant man, the one who's illumined and has spirit. You see, THE PROFANE DON'T HAVE SPIRITTHERE'S the BIG SECRET. You're base. You're creatures of instinct, as Paul said in the New Testament.
The mob, who are slaves, stay slaves basically and they stay there; and of course, being slaves and dumb and stupid, they make a golden calf because the slaves, the base ones, want a two-legged or at least a four-legged something solid anyway to worship. They don't want a god or something that they can't see, feel and touch. They want to worship something physical; and so Moses the illumined one goes up the mountain, up the degrees, up the scale to talk to God. He went where the rest could not follow. That's what it means. That's the simple esoteric story of it.  Moses in Egyptian means "CHILD".  Unless you become as a child you cannot see the kingdom of heaven. Ramoses is as child of Ra. Thothmoses is as child of Thoth; and on and on we go.
We've been under tremendous mind control for such a long time—the law under intense control.  The Masons again in their own publications will tell you there's a Masonic push to have universal education, the same education worldwide, to standardize a bunch of schmucks who never question reality. Who accept reality as it's presented to them from birth—and that's what good management means. The schmucks don't know they're schmucks.
When you see the people coming out of colleges and universities, they wear the cloak - the cloak used to be always black for Saturn. Now they use red ones. I've noticed they're very popular. I saw a pinkish-red actually, which is even more telling for both sexes. 
If you're an architect or an engineer, you understand technical drawings. You see things in a way differently from other people, because most people see the solid front of an object. They don't see the different aspects: the front view, the top view, the side view. They can't put a picture in their minds, but the architect does; and of course, when you're wearing a little “hod,” as the brick masons call it, they used a hod where they carried the bricks up the ladder. That's what they put them on; and that square represents that, you see, the squaring of the head.  The round head is not natural, the rolling stone, and has the perfect squared head you see. The "ashlar," as they call it in Masonry, is now perfected; so, nature wasn't good enough. By themselves, they will perfect nature and that's what they say in Masonry. They're here to perfect that which was left imperfect.  Guess what that means? —Everything, including you.
You look from the top view on these little square heads, and people with the gowns on and dresses, and you'll see that. You'll see the square.  If you were to see the head and then you think you see square and the circle within the middle of the squaring of the circle. You see that's what it means: The squaring of the circle; The squaring of your brain; A brick in the wall.  It really means that you've got a quality approval stamp on you by those who run the system, that they've dumbed you down and you're now stupid enough to work in their system and fork over 40 to 50% of your our earnings to them.
In the old days they needed slave drivers. Slave drivers take away from your profit; and who watches the slave drivers?  We are self-maintained slaves through money that we think is natural like gravity, simply because it exists in our time when we live; and that's how easy it is to control us.
WE ARE SELF-MAINTAINED SLAVES. WE'RE TRAINED FOR ONE THING AND THAT'S WORK IN A SYSTEM TO PRODUCE AND CONSUME.  Whether you're producing or consuming, with all the sales taxes, you're still paying lots of tax money.  That goes back to the elite, of course, who use the money for big projects, which we all supposedly call public projects, big huge projects like building railroads across continents and gas works in Britain and water works and roadways.  Then when they have it all working and all the problems ironed out, they sell it to each other for peanuts, you see. That's called progress; and all these schmucks keep doing it.
People watch this down through the centuries in Europe as these huge projects were built up by the taxpayer. We're all working for the common good, the common good and then, gee whiz, one day they tell you we can't go on like this you know. It's too expensive. We need to have more professional people with a motive, a profit motive to take care of us. An incentive to make things work, so they could pick it up for a raffle; and of course, one of the handful of the elite Masonic buddies gets to win it for peanuts. It's a beautiful world, this road to progress, this destiny of progress.
It's never been defined to the public exactly where you're going; and that's not by chance. Although, it is told you legally through movies and novels and even songs. That's called "predictive programming", because legally they must tell you what they're doing, and they do all the time in the movies and novels and music.
Plato described the whole technique. Today, we call it a form of indoctrination of "predictive programming." Which means that through fiction or through anything - you're enjoying yourself, you're being entertained under cover. ENTERTAIN. “TAIN” comes from tin, the cover. When you're “under the cover”, your censor part of your mind is not working.  If it's not working, you're unaware that you're being downloaded like a computer.  All the little emotional techniques they use, and you're identifying with a hero or the female as the heroine (and those people in-between, these days) and all that kind of stuff, once you start identifying the characters, they've got you—because they can take you anywhere, no matter what that character does.  As long as you identify this much with them, they then can take you that much into where they want you to go emotionally. Therefore, when the real things started happening in your own life, you say, “This is kind of familiar to me” and you don't object to it, because you're thinking, “I guess it's the only way we could go in society in this particular area. I guess it's a natural evolution,” but then your mind was prepared, because these guys are the shepherds you know. They've another bunch of slaves and scientists that work for them, who do this mind control business; and they farm us, to an extent.
First of all, they know where they want to grow in this field with the crop they want to grow, and how high, and how many.  They first prepare the land. They cut the brush. They plow it. They harrow it. They do all the necessary groundwork.  Then they sow the seed and watch it grow and cultivate it.
Watch what they do with your mind, in preparation for every event that will happen in your life, in every major event in your life. You'll see it all through movies, especially in this day and age.  In the last century (in the 20th century) it was primarily novels and stage plays and music halls et cetera, but today it's in everybody's TV. The one-eyed set, the eye of Lucifer or Ra, you know, the Te-Levi-Zion.  Then they program it right into you for entertainment, and then you see it happening in your life and you think, “I guess that's okay. It's sort of natural, isn't it,” and you don't think anymore beyond that. Where did the idea come from in the first place? It's marketed to you through entertainment and that's the prime for reason for entertainment.
It's not for you to sit and have music while you chew the grass like good little sheep.  It's to program you.   That's why you have to have BIG BUCKS to get into the entertainment industry. You have to pay BIG BUCKS and you must be qualified in being a very high degree Mason who knows the scores, as they say, because they can't let any Joe Blow come in.
Plato said that thousands of years ago. "CULTURE IS CREATED FROM THE TOP AND PUT DOWN TO THE PEOPLE." You're taught it comes from the grass roots, you see, and withers or blossoms, or weeds that grow.  It doesn't—because they can't allow anything to come from the grass roots because it's not in their plan.   They never tell the unforetold consequences that the simplest, seemingly innocent thing could possibly do, the rippling effects and what it would affect and so on.  Everything comes from the top down in this culture creation business; and it's always been that way in civilization. What normality was, we haven't a clue.
Prior to the incoming of these characters with their system—the ancient system of money, conology, you know priesthoods and merchandising and rulerships. Ruler, of course, comes from the ruler. The ruler they use in school, the ruler. Everything is Masonic terminology. Cane (Cain) is the same thing too. He's a priest; he's also a builder. Cain was the first artificer, the first scientist, who made things with metals and so on, weaponry. You have a ruler.  A cane is also a ruler.  They used to use the canes - the bulrushes to make rulers in ancient Middle East.
They rule us and they measure us, you see.  A good ruler “weighs you in the balance,” as they say, and if you're found wanting, he won't have you around because he wants efficiency.  That's where we're going today with pure efficiency, school to work. School to work.
Now when you listen to the elite talking, if you ever mix amongst them, you'll hear them discuss this kind of stuff quite freely. “Oh the people need us. The masses, the peasants, the profane, they need us.” It's like saying the mice in the field need that hawk; and so they rationalize this nonsense.
They can never look at themselves honestly, because good psychopaths cannot. They run on ego, super ego. That's why they're PSYCHOPATHS and they get their way regardless of the consequences to anyone around them, because they have no empathy for others.  They can work together, as long as they're working towards a common goal and they're always sharing the loot, but the time obviously comes when good psychopaths have to turn on each other.  It will eventually come one day as the throne of the world comes into sight and each one wants his name chiseled in stone, as they always do, these guys. A statue and his name chiseled in stone—He's the first king of the whole entire planet.  They're all chomping at the bit to get it.  The co-operation won't last forever. That doesn't help the masses, of course, because in the meantime they are being called off.
Population control counsels were held by Britain under Thomas Malthus in the 1700’s.  They discussed methods of culling off the excess people through disease or creating housing schemes, basically on swamp-lands and unhealthy areas. Stuff that we did to the American Indians, in other words. Put them in areas where they can't eat very well and the climate isn't the best and the swamp eating mosquitoes or whatever and plagues breakout.  They even had it worked out, under Malthus, that the poor houses that they created, where they threw you in when you were broke or you owed money for your rent, as most folks did. They rented in Britain, for instance, in Europe; and if you didn't have money, they’d throw you in a debtors prison, which costs you money, by they way. That was added to what you owed.  Then they kicked you out into the poor house where you were forced to work until you died, and you didn't last long. In the poor house, most women and children lasted six months at the most, and this was called a more efficient way of disposing of the “POOR UNFORTUNATES,” as they called them.
This is the REAL HISTORY, which isn't hidden if you want to find it. It's not a nice drama like a docudrama like TV or Anne of Green Gables, all the rubbish that they feed you.  People get most of their history today through romantic novels and stuff like that. There was nothing romantic about the 1700’s, the 1800’s or the 1900’s. For most people it was a horror show.  That horror show has been slightly alleviated at the moment, because the biggest change of all is coming into view, the completion of the "Great Work." You know, the one that started 4,500 BC, where they see themselves running the world in a scientific manner. The natural order or the stupid ones, they won't exist if they're too stupid; and there'll be no free thought or free opinion.   We see it all today with all the political correctness and all this kind of stuff being forced down our throats. It's actually being implemented; and unfortunately, the people themselves are their own worst enemy.
It's like the "Matrix One" movie, because they show you in the Matrix movie, since the elite, themselves, they ultimately give you those movies.  You're cheering on the guy you think is the good guy, but you've got it all mixed up, you see. This is themselves they're talking about. The new and Neo Anderson, Andra from the Greek Andros - man, Neo ANDERSON - The new SON OF MAN, The new messiah. The new messiah. The Superman with all these superpowers. You see that's where Superman comes from. It's the superpowers. That's what gets us into the next age. Those who can't do that will not be allowed into the next age.  It's no coincidence it’s identical, this Freemasonry of the European elite. There's no coincidence. It's identical within dualistic theology, a caste system.
There's a Hinduism, too, at the end of the ages. Those who are unworthy to come into the next must perish. They must not be allowed into the next age; and so we see the massive spraying in the skies. We see all the inoculations being dished out, people getting sicker—adolescent arthritis now. Inoculations, more and more of them, and all the propaganda on television that we're force-fed through - it's always law - always law series or hospital series and drama and detectives and DNA swab-testing and all this stuff. It's all training you, you see.
It's all propaganda to make you OBEY these AUTHORITIES, these specialists.  Law, medicine and the courts and science DNA and scientific techniques of finding things out, you see. It's training you to accept this as a natural order, because it's nothing like the reality. Nothing like the reality, but it is good entertainment and it's good programming for the people, and towards an end that they don't even think about, because they're not taught to think.
WE'RE TAUGHT NOT TO THINK. That's what WE'RE EDUCATED for.
The first thing you learn in school is to "repeat after me." If you repeat after me, you get a little gold star and if you're not repeating and you're very good at repeating, then people call you clever. That's nothing to do with being clever. That's being a good parrot. Repeating after me is a good parrot. That's what they want because then you get the quality approval stamp. Square your head, you're now unnatural. You're dumb enough to get into their system.  That's the real system we live within.
It's quite funny really, tragically funny, because they can't tell the people we have been killing you. They can't tell them. Don't tell the children what you're doing – “the poor things wouldn't understand, poor dears.” We find the same thing with Afrikaners in Africa. That's how they talked about the blacks. “Well, you see, you can't help them because they're children really. They have children's mentality so you can't really be straightforward with them.”  That's how the elite treat all of us.
To the elite, the peasantry of China is no lower than the peasantry in Europe or the Americas; because they believe in elite breeding and the elite breeders of every country rule every country; therefore, it's one big club. You've proven your worth to join. You're “worthy,” as they say in Masonry.
Second generation Masons or first generation Masons can't get terribly high unless they marry an Eastern Star and bring up a son, an offspring.  A special - it's a breeding program. You'll see it in the Rosicrucian books, where they keep tongue-in-cheek hinting for the very stupid, because it's meant to pickup every stupid into these societies; and through almost stumbling over each other, they tell you that selection is very important.
SELECTIVE BREEDING is what they're getting at; and “don't let the lower head rule the upper head” is what they say to them, and nobody understands that. That's why it's always in their language.  It's a breeding program.  A first generation Mason can't get up terribly high, even in the second degree of the Scottish Rite; but if he marries an Eastern Star, who, again, is up two generations, then the offspring can go higher—the son of the Mason and then the third generation can go much higher still. Therefore, you're breeding upwards through selective breeding and they've wisely chosen for you at that level, just like the nobility’s wives have always been chosen for the men.
What you do in your free time when you're not breeding is up to yourselves, as long as you're both kept in a good financial style. She can do what she wants and you can do what you want. There's no love there. LOVE is something which is FAIRLY NEW that's been MARKETED TO THE PUBLIC; because people, even in the past, in the lower orders of things, married out of necessity, male and female; and they really didn't have a good life, either one.
When the Normans came into Britain and introduced this wonderful system of lordship over the public, and also subservience to the king, the head chutzpah; and then you have the lords and the feudal lords below them; and the sub-lords they're servicing and their own patch to guard over and use—the peasantry were bought and sold with the land.  In English, they elected to change it to SERFS.
They didn't like the word slavery because “we're a Christian country and we can't have that in our history books, so we call them serfs.”  90% of the public were serfs, you see, and they were bought and sold with the land. It started from the time of the Norman invasion, which brought civilization to Europe. This is the same civilization through slaughtering people, massively financially backed as well. Just many years in the making this, and tremendous logistics in keeping them all supplied at sea and land, was much bigger than WWII, and costs and the whole thing and time.
This is an ancient system coming through here backing it heavily; and it was a “must be.”  THEY HAD TO CONQUER EVERYTHING AND ELIMINATE ALL OPPOSITION, WHICH THEY DID, and they were terrible rulers. They were inhumane, terribly inhumane.
The Normans came in and they had the "Domesday Book" created. The "Domesday Book" was an inventory of all that they owned. All that the king owned—and that was people, livestock, houses, children, chickens, everything. It was a complete inventory of whole land that he owned.  That was nothing new because the ancient pharaohs had the same system in Egypt; and it was nothing new because the Normans also - a lord would put out his son to a relative, to an uncle or whatever, another lord and he would become taught the ways of knighthood through this relative. That was traditional with Normans.
When you jump back to the pharaohs, they did the same thing, because their sons would get sent off to a different "satrapy," they called them, little princes-satrapy.  They get brought up and taught the ways of being noble and a warrior, a knight, you see. The same bunch all down through history. The same techniques: money, priesthoods, power, slaughter, armies and the people have to produce.
The Normans allowed the peasantry to keep maybe 40% or so, or 60% of their crops, and there was no intensive farming then. They didn't have all the high-tech stuff they do today, so crops weren't often terribly huge; but the lord would take 40% or even 60% of yours and keep enough for his staff and his armies, and sell all the rest for profit.  Then profit had to be split all the way up to the king at the top.
THE REAL MAFIA SYSTEM: THIS IS THE MOST ORGANIZED GANG ON THE PLANET. IT'S A GANG SYSTEM.
We have these Normans taking that off.  Today, when you work out we are allowed to keep, if you work through all the taxes, hidden taxes and so on, purchases taxes and income taxes and property taxes, you're paying more than that yourself, today, so it's pretty well the same. The only difference is they don't have to send the army around through the forest to slaughter you and beat you into submission, to make you pay up, because we do it willingly, because we're trained to do it willingly. We're trained better.
WE'RE SELF-MAINTAINED SLAVES TODAY.

There are many sides to this whole system here.  On today's talk, all I'm really talking about is the physical side of things, some of it. It's incredibly clever. It's by using sciences which are not taught to the general public—the mind control manipulation.
They have perfect understand of their prey. They're the perfect predator. That's why, on their coat of arms, they have all these predatory animals.  Albert Pike, the Grand Master, the big Pope of Scottish Freemasonry, in the 1800’s, said, "we make no apologies for nature."  Then he goes on to tell the different animals they hunt. In other words, they make no apologies for being called predators, and that's their natural order.
At the bottom of course, the schmucks at the bottom, they go to the Blue Lodge and 1,2,3 degrees, and think, “I've made it.”  These guys are little prunes who walk around collecting charity money. That's the cover for the guys at the top—sudden virtue. They have sudden virtue.
They want to help people now, as they call it, “freebees” that they're getting through the system.  Yes, there's one side, which is all sides, perfect understanding of human nature—all kinds, types of human nature. Perfect understanding.
Nothing is new under the sun, as they say. There's also a religion behind this; and their religion on one level is very Darwinistic. Darwin only espoused what they had already believed themselves for many thousands of years.
In the movie, "2001," Arthur C. Clarke, very high Freemason gives you the agenda of High Freemasonry. Not the “schmuckdom” freemasonry but the high stuff. He gives you their agenda and their philosophy and their religion in the movie.  At the beginning of the movie "2001," made in the 1960’s, they show you the ape-man, you know the hairy guys supposedly, and the new guys are terrified of the darkness.  They'd go to their caves at night, and in the morning, they go across the watering bowl and meet this other tribe of ape-men.  They shake their fists and go through a little dance, a song and dance, and then they muffle off on their own separate ways; and that's how things have gone on forever.  The little sequences around—they're showing you there's a big part, you see, it’s part of their religion.
You'll understand all this later; and this way, you've got a tree brush shaped like a big snake you see, and some of the emblems - these are actually Masonic emblems, high occultic emblems you see all through it.  Even though the story eventually goes into space, it starts with these cave-men and an obelisk comes down. There's this black obelisk.
In the book, it's more detailed.  The obelisk throws its cave-men out, one by one, and makes them jump around and stuff.  It’s testing them out to see who's got the best smarts. He picks one of them, and one day, the watering hole, and instead of going over and shaking their fist and screaming and having to drink more and go home, this one picks up a bone; because the love of the skull and the cross bones of Masonry, the pirates, right. He picks up the thighbone and then he smashes his enemy over the waterhole there and he kills him; and that's telling you that's their right of might. The right of might: He will kill a superior and then they give you religions for being meek and mild. They teach another one for themselves.
Progress. You see they have a thing called "progress." They hate something called stagnant civilization,  “arrested” civilizations; and to them it's a progress.  Progress to them is done through those who are willing to kill and become the top chutzpah of the king—king of the ape-men.  Then it jumps from there into the future to the year 2001, and then a space journey encounters, supposedly, on the trail of this obelisk that they unearthed. It ends up on Jupiter; but it's all occultic. It's nothing to do with space travel. There's a Masonic initiation in it. You will see the computer HAL on board the spaceship traveling to Jupiter. It kills off two of the guys that are with him and then tries to kill off the third guy. He outsmarts it and disables it, meaning he overcame all the natural laws.
HAL is the son, like HALOGEN, you know, HAL-CYON. HAL and H-A-L, one letter after each one in the alphabet is IBM, you see.  IBM, you speak it and it's I-beam, the beam from the eye, the eye of Ra. The beaming from the eye is between the pyramid, the capstone and the rest of the pyramid.
Everything is shown to you. It's not necessary you understand. It's only necessary that you think you understand, whatever comes out of these movies, chomping away – “ah it's a good movie. What's next? Have no idea what it means.”
 Then "2010" is a follow-up to the movie, and it shows you what's supposed to happen in 2010.  There's a big thing at the end, where this guy who escapes the computer remembers in the next movie he's timeless, he's ageless, as he's become a god, because he overcame HALCYON, you see, the sun, the natural order.  He overcame all the laws and he's a god; and a new sun appears in the sky, but "as above so below," so a new sun will appear on the earth: A messiah, a being, an entity, whatever it is. They bring force to you with much hullabaloo and fanfare I'm sure.
They're telling you their system. They show you their religion from evolution, which is their belief system both physical and spiritual, because they do believe in reincarnation; but they don't believe that everybody reincarnates. There's a whole theology behind that, even though encouraged to believe in it amongst the lesser, as they call it. They have a different belief system for themselves, a specialized one; well, naturally, that's a special one. You can't foresee what is everyone else. So there's the physical and inbreeding which is terribly, terribly important to them because it's part of the “spiritual recycling,” you might say, of the same dynasties within dynasties; and that's what they claim gives them their power and intellect and the right to dominate and so on; and they give us religions.
Religion is to tie, to rebind, to re-tie. They tie our minds down. When you're tied, you're not free to think.  We're told we're free, so that's how it compensates. We're told we're free, even though we're crippled at birth by a system, which is indoctrination.
Now they're getting to the stage where they're going to declare their world government. The scientific established elite bureaucracy to run us all, you see massive bureaucracy. Lenin talked about it because he was in on it. He was created by the same guys. They create all oppositions. You can't get progress unless you have opposition to fight, because that's how you stir up matter. You stir up the world. You can't have one law coming this way and going unimpeded, apart from having no fun in that and the fact is it will never succeed.
You've got to get the public to go along with it, so you need oppositions.  They give you all the oppositions and none of that comes the way you want it to go, which are sheep dogs. Bark, bark and the sheep go this way. One sheep dog and you try to do it, you see them run in all directions. Beautiful really, isn't it?
They give us good shepherds, down through the ages, with this little shepherd crook to pull you; and they are crooks. That's where the word comes from. THEY ARE THE CROOKS AT THE TOP AND THEY ARE VERY PROUD OF IT.
We have sun gods, all down through the ages; and we have Mary's, all down through the ages.  There are all these virgins, and of course, there's so many sun gods all down through the ages, who come back and tell the same stuff; and iron crosses, because the sun crosses, you see, at the meridian points and so on, and the sun sets highest in its crossing and we have the cross of the sun.  WE'VE BEEN CONNED MIGHTILY. We've fought each other over all this rubbish. We've been very predictable sheep indeed.
Always learning but never knowing. NEVER KNOWING.

Data. This data doesn't mean it's truth or anything else. We're stuffed full of incredible data today. That doesn't mean it's true, or any of it, or even that it's necessary to know.
The only person who could be natural today would be a few survivors in the Amazon, today, who haven't been caught yet and handed a credit card and cell phone, because these are called "primitive societies," and there's some left in Borneo and different places. They HAVE NO NEED of psychiatry or medicine or pharmaceutical agencies. They don't know what high blood pressure was or diabetes or therapy or psychoanalysis. Didn't know who Freud was. Didn't care and didn't need him or Einstein or any rest of the other rubbish, because that's what they are. Actually, they're rubbish. They're front-men chosen at a particular time to push a specific dogma. They even create the dogmas.
These "primitive men," as they call them, really are probably more in-tune with their reality, more than we could ever imagine. You'll see them staring in the jungle at a tree away somewhere. They'll stare for two or three hours. That's got meaning for the person.  To us, we'd say, “What's the profit in it? What the purpose? Profit, purpose.” However, you see he's getting some mental healing out of it, whatever it is happening; and as long as he's doing it, live and let live. Leave him alone. He doesn't need pills and tranquilizers and all that star TV or soaps or anything else. This guy can survive in his own way and all of his offspring will survive for thousands and thousands of years if you leave them alone. We can't. We are interdependent on the system. The system that makes us go crazy makes you interdependent on the system.
“Wow, we've got the pills to cure you. Well, we can't cure you, but we can treat you for life. There's no profit in curing you, but just live for a few more years and keep paying us and we'll make you feel happy or sad or whatever you want, we'll give it to you.”  That's what we're told is the meaning of life, being happy all the time. That's a new phenomena, this ego-syntonic behavior. It didn't used to be taught your purpose in life was to be happy all the time, like some sort of manic ecstasy.
That's all you see now, it’s marketed on every ad to you. If you're buying a toothbrush, to an exercise machine, you have smiling people and grinning like balloons, and you know what they are doing, they're grinning and happy they just bought this whatever it is.  That's what we're told, “Life is supposed to be happy.” Be happy, you know the song. That was the message. That's all the message it was in that dumb song. “Don't worry, be happy. Don't worry, be happy.”
Life is supposed to be an experience of ALL emotions, and its in-between emotions, neither happy nor sad; but they can't have that, you see. When you're neither excessively happy or sad, you might think; and if you think, that could be a danger to those that RULE YOU.
That's why you're crammed with all these choices of “who’s going to do my thinking today. How many channels on TV can I get, or how many radio stations?”  They've got satellite stations for radio now, there's not many of them. Or, “How many video games can I play with today, but give me someone else's thoughts because I don't want to use my own. It's too much of a burden.” THINKING IS A BURDEN.
In fact, when it comes to the brain chip time and of course, they carved the active chipped ID card, which is coming, that's only a part way gesture towards this, is to condition you for the inevitable.  Most people will think, and of course, it will be marketed—the lies will be marketed to them, the purpose of it.  The public will think, “Gee, this is great. I want mine.” They might even give you bronze, silver, gold and platinum to give it snob appeal.
Once everyone has one, the real function will kick in once that's happened, and THERE WILL BE NO MORE YOU.   This is from science meetings; world science meetings have said this. They have all this ready to go, so they can market this idea to the public.
It's being done through movies at the moment, in novels, characters, even so, they think there're going to be Supermen, but they're not. They might be physically as a good rook cyborg, but they won't be themselves. THERE WILL BE NO ABILITY TO EVEN PERCEIVE OF YOURSELF AS A DISTINCT INDIVIDUAL and that was said at the Loyola University meeting, where they held one of these world science meetings on this very subject.
We're guided like sheep to the slaughterhouse. Most will go willingly because they've swallowed reality hook, line and sinker, as it's been presented to them. Those who understand what's going on are caught in different degrees of sides. Join a patriot side. Join a militia side. Join this that and the other.  All these sides are given for you by the same elite who run things at the present.
THEY'VE ALWAYS GIVEN US OUR HEROES TO FOLLOW, ALWAYS. Albert Pike said that: “We always give the people their heroes.” That's why they never lose. So you don't follow people.  These are the masters of manipulation.  You really think you can beat them by learning the law and using their law against them?
The only way you can beat this is starting with yourself, because you have to know yourself and start to dominant yourself and think for yourself, because we are up against incredible, incredible evil. I hate even using the word because the whole English language is all Masonic, and EVIL IS JUST LIVE BACKWARDS.
Everything is coded this way in the English language.  Even the words we're given are a computer language for the elite so we can speak it into existence for them.
There are other languages, too, more than just that. Other senses we can use. They're just mental imagery, great symbols as well. They use symbols all the time to indoctrinate us. Words, letters are just symbols although they have occultic meaning in Masonry and higher; but, ultimately, what kind of mind is running this whole thing that's not human obviously. That's what gets you yet in a loss, there are human psychopaths working for them. Clever psychopaths and dumb ones too. The dumb ones are generally used for executions in wartime and stuff—torture and that kind of thing.
The more intelligent ones are up wearing suits and ties and lying to you. That's the gift that psychopath has is the ability to lie without emotion and speak no matter what they've done—without pills. What's above all this is they can plan all this such a long time ago, never lose control down through the eons, is worshiped by the high elite themselves and their strange rituals. It runs all religions, even the ones that think they're opposing each other and the subsections of the religions that think they're opposing each other. They gave all these ones to the people.

What are we really up against here?  Those who are willing to open Pandora's Box will eventually come to this big question. Is there any white knight out there? Is there a cavalry coming at the last minute?  It's all in the books and in the novels and the movies and religions.  You have to participate in life to offset this; and participating in life, which means KNOW YOURSELF, COME ALIVE and use your life for it; because if you don't, it's game over for everyone.
Most people don't care about anyone else today and that's true. I've heard it so many times. “Well, thank God. By the time they bring the last part of this in, I'll be dead. I'll probably be retired and I'll spend my pension, I'll be dead, thank God,” because they don't give a damn about those that come, which also means that they don't give a damn about all of their own ancestors that came before them and suffered and slaved and so on, so that they could relax with a pension.
THERE'S NO CONTINUITY BETWEEN THE PAST, PRESENT AND THE FUTURE.
Ego-syntonic behavior has been encouraged and it's very possible brain damage has occurred as well, since Arthur Koestler who worked at the United Nations and wrote a book called "The Ghost in the Machine" and who worked on ways to lobotomize that part of the brain that gives you yourself awareness and your critical survival capabilities. He was working on ways to destroy that chemically, bacteriologically, through viruses, whatever. There's different segments working for the U.N. on this and he wrote about it all in his book. He was all for it right to the end. It's a square line to you.  He said that the elite won't need - I mean that the peasants basically - the masses won't need those instincts anymore because the scientific elite will be making all their decisions for them. We'll be managed, well managed you see.
Whereas those who manage us must keep theirs, because they must retain survival capabilities so they could steal your planet earth into the future. That's what the rulers at the top talk about it, of course, as they talk about us. We must not know this kind of stuff. We're just children. It'll give us nightmares. Don't tell the children what we're doing.
The IQ levels are dropping. It doesn't happen by—you're born with an IQ. When it starts dropping, something has happened to make that happen. What can do it? Bacterial warfare? Bio-warfare techniques? Injections?  They were discussing this back in the 1700’s and 1800’s, using inoculations to do it, at big meetings in Europe.
You'll find Jack Cousteau talking about that. David Suzuki in Canada. Have to bring down the populations. They don't just talk about it. They have a Department of Population Control at the United Nations. What do you think it means? A wish list that they sit and dream about? No. It means that they will implement it and they can't tell the children. They can't tell the children, “Hey, you're going to have a shorter life. You're going to come down with crippling diseases and you'll die out there.” They can't tell you the truth. You don't tell the children the truth. It's scary.
There’s so much to encompass, so much, so many directions; so much of the esoteric to explain to you. There’s so much of the exoteric to explain to you for things to start happening. Therefore, I went through doing all of this talk. This is just a little intro. Just gives you a petty quick synopsis of the past and the present and where we're going in the future—very shortly, actually.
We're getting sprayed like bugs from the sky with those who have eyes to see. Like bugs. Just like bugs. Like you take a can of Raid and spray it over an anthill. That's what they think of us and not one person in major media will talk about it. Why?
BECAUSE: THE MEDIA IS ONE OF THE MOST ESSENTIAL ARMS OF GOVERNMENT. IT'S PART OF GOVERNMENT. THEY COULDN'T GIVE YOU THEIR MATRIX REALITY WITHOUT IT. THEY COULDN'T KEEP YOU IN IT WITHOUT IT.
It's not all gloom and doom. It's not all gloom and doom at all, but before you can save others, you've got to save yourself; and to do that you have a lot of work to do, a lot of decisions to make. Most can't make those decisions. Most will say, "Hey, leave Pandora's Box closed. It's scary in there. It could be dark. I might fall in,” but there's always brave souls who will and that's the ones who come alive. The dead will never make choices. The choices are made for them.
Excuse this little homemade video here, but when you're relying on a shoestring, you can still get the word out if you want to; and I'll talk to you again.
Thanks for listening.