Showing posts with label Provincialism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Provincialism. Show all posts

Sunday, February 1, 2009

Bush Hatred and Obama Euphoria: Two Sides of the Same Coin

Peter Berkowitz maintains that Bush hatred and Obama Euphoria are two sides of the same coin in an Wall Street Journal op-ed on yesterday. I have reprinted segments here but it's a great article which should be read in it's entirety here.

He writes:

"Now that George W. Bush has left the harsh glare of the White House and Barack Obama has settled into the highest office in the land, it might be
reasonable to suppose that Bush hatred and Obama euphoria will begin to subside.
Unfortunately, there is good reason to doubt that the common sources that have
nourished these dangerous political passions will soon lose their potency.
At first glance, Bush hatred and Obama euphoria could not be more different. Hatred of Mr. Bush went well beyond the partisan broadsides typical of democratic politics. For years it disfigured its victims with open, indeed proud, loathing for the very manner in which Mr. Bush walked and talked. It compelled them to denounce the president and his policies as not merely foolish or wrong or contrary to the national interest, but as anathema to everything that made America great.In contrast, the euphoria surrounding Mr. Obama's run for president conferred upon the candidate immunity from criticism despite his newness to national politics and lack of executive experience, and regardless of how empty his calls for change. At the same time, it inspired those in its grips, repeatedly bringing them tears of joy throughout the long election season. With Mr. Obama's victory in November and his inauguration last week, it suffused them with a sense that not only had the promise of America at last been redeemed but that the world could now be transfigured.

In fact, Bush hatred and Obama euphoria -- which tend to reveal more about those who feel them than the men at which they are directed -- are opposite sides of the same coin. Both represent the triumph of passion over reason. Both are intolerant of dissent. Those wallowing in Bush hatred and those reveling in Obama euphoria frequently regard those who do not share their passion as contemptible and beyond the reach of civilized discussion. Bush hatred and Obama euphoria typically coexist in the same soul. And it is disproportionately members of the intellectual and political class in whose souls they flourish."(emphasis added)



He goes on to say that:

"Bush hatred and Obama euphoria are particularly toxic because they thrive in and have been promoted by the news media, whose professional responsibility, it has long been thought, is to gather the facts and analyze their significance, and by the academy, whose scholarly training, it is commonly assumed, reflects an aptitude for and dedication to systematic study and impartial inquiry."



Well, that's a foregone conclusion as the media as we knew it is dead!

He continues:

"Some will speculate that the outbreak of hatred and euphoria in our politics is the result of the transformation of left-liberalism into a religion, its
promulgation as dogma by our universities, and students' absorption of their
professors' lesson of immoderation. This is unfair to religion.

At least it's unfair to those forms of biblical faith that teach that God's ways are hidden and mysterious, that all human beings are both deserving of respect and inherently flawed, and that it is idolatry to invest things of this world -- certainly the goods that can be achieved through politics -- with absolute value. Through these teachings, biblical faith encourages skepticism about grand claims to moral and political authority and an appreciation of the limits of one's knowledge, both of which well serve liberal democracy."(emphasis added)



Lastly he opines:

"In contrast, by assembling and maintaining faculties that think alike about politics and think alike that the university curriculum must instill correct political opinions, our universities cultivate intellectual conformity and discourage the exercise of reason in public life........Rather, they infuse a certain progressive interpretation of our freedom and equality with sacred significance, zealously requiring not only outward obedience to its policy dictates but inner persuasion of the heart and mind. This transforms dissenters into apostates or heretics, and leaders into redeemers."(emphasis added)


In the words of my dearly departed Mother..."My Lord and My God! This is precisely why I am scared out of my wits for Mini-me as she goes off to college. I am so afraid that my baby is going to be indoctrinated not only with liberal ideology which is bad enough but with contempt towards others who see things differently. Case in point -- just look at how the masses view the black conservative. Is there more contempt for any other group of people? Doesn't feel like it.

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

No Fool Like An Old Fool...78 Year Old Says Obama Is His Moses


78 year old James Presley a grandson of slaves describes Barack Obama as his Moses. I'm sure this man has many redeeming qualities he has been married to the same woman for 57 years, he appears to have lived an upstanding Christian life, but if he managed to get to the ripe old age of 78 and is still looking for Moses to lead him to the promise land then he is just foolish. First of all, God didn't promise to send another Moses--although he said that there would be an "anti-christ" who would fool the very elect (but, Obama is too obviously counterfeit to be the anti-christ). Mr. Presley says:

"Presley says the fact the nation will have a black president will have a ripple effect in poor communities like his. For the first time ever, he says, black parents and grandparents can tell youngsters in rural America that through education, anything is possible -- that the White House isn't just for white folks."(Read full article here)

I have said before that this is so sad. Has Black America been so despairing and hopeless that they haven't been telling their children that they can achieve anything? If so, what does that say about us as parents? Is Mr. Presley not inadvertently saying that white parents are better parents because PEBO's mama was white and clearly she encouraged him to excel in all of his endeavors.


I'm sickened by Mr. Presley's mantra and all the weeping black folks. Ok, I get that this is historic and we never thought we would see the day but the day has come and it's no deeper that that. We still have work to do for ourselves -- PEBO has promised us nothing. Hope and change are not strategies its just the rhetoric he used to "inspire" your dumb behinds to vote for him. So be inspired and get off your azzes waiting for Massah PEBO (Moses) to give you scrapes from his table. We look like such a weak, impotent, ass-backward people when we say such things. I don't believe that we are, I don't even believe Mr. Presley is weak -- but he is foolish as hell if he actually believes that PEBO is "our" Moses.

There are thousands of Mr. Presleys who raised their children, husbanded their wives worked and provided for their families. My Grand-daddy was one of them and they are un-sung heroes. But I seriously doubt that my "Poppie" would be duped by PEBO. He may have voted for him just to "give the black guy a chance" but I'm convinced he wouldn't be looking for PEBO to make an impact on his life or the lives of his family because he saw that as HIS job.

Afterthought: That CNN Producer Mr. Drash is a metaphor for the Democratic Party. He is singing Mr. Presley's praises because he has been a compliant Negro. He didn't get all uppity and leave the plantation....No, no, no he stayed and farmed cotton on the plantation of the white man who enslaved his ancestors. Do you get it? Mr. Drash lifts him up as an un-sung hero --throws a few scraps his way. That's exactly how the Democratic party wants us to be. Compliant, dumb and dependent not uppity... be happy because we have given you a black president (a mere ort), and we are about to give you a $700 stimulus -- we love you so... and we are so jubliant....."thank ya so much for recognizin' we Mistah Charlie"

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Black Provincialism: Help or Hindrance?

Why is it incumbent upon me as a black woman to prove that I don't despise "all things black"? Why is there even an "all things black" phenomenon? Exactly WHAT are "black things"? How is this not self-inflicted racism? Why should I bother to live up to stereotypes and bad caricatures of black womanhood to somehow prove that I am "down"( is that black enough)? Actually "down for what? Why must all black thought be monolithic? These are the questions that race through my mind whenever I have a conversation with familiars that I love (aka my family).

I understand being proud of your heritage and having healthy self-esteem but have we gone too far?

One area of black provincialism is the decision to attend Historically Black Colleges and Universities --Are they Healthy or a Hindrance? Mini-me wants to attend a historically black college -- I would rather that she does not, but it's her choice. My familiars never have a shortage of words on the subject of the prevalence of racism in our society. So, if racism is such an issue then why would I be happy about my kid going to a college which "racists" will view as inferior? I guess I can answer that with "who cares what racists think", but as a Mom I don't want my daughter to be hindered in anyway by a provincial mindset. Can anyone help me sort through this one? I concede that I can not see clearly on this issue and I implore a bit wisdom and guidance here.