"I was collecting research and most of the research I had were government documents or old books...one is a very important book that Carnegie Corporation published in 1934. That is probably the most important one of all to discuss since we don't have much time to go into all my research. That book was given to me by a very brilliant fellow who was in Naval Intelligence. He gave us his library. Carnegie Corporation commissioned the American Historical Association to do the research over a period of four years and the result was the AHA's "Conclusions and Recomendations for the Social Studies". The recommendation in the book was to use the schools to change America from a free, individualist economy to a planned, socialist, collectivist economy in the New World Order." (Source)
My paradigm has been forced to shift as I have been trying to debunk so-called "conspiracy theories" and sadly I can't. Perhaps someone can help me...seriously I don't want to believe this stuff.
I don't want to believe that "there is a worldwide conspiracy being orchestrated by an extremely powerful and influential group of genetically-related individuals (at least at the highest echelons) which include many of the world's wealthiest people, top political leaders, and corporate elite, as well as members of the so-called Black Nobility of Europe (dominated by the British Crown) whose goal is to create a One World (fascist) Government, stripped of nationalistic and regional boundaries, that is obedient to their agenda. Their intention is to effect complete and total control over every human being on the planet and to dramatically reduce the world's population by 5.5 Billion people. "
I'm sure some may be thinking CBW has lost her natural mind and jumped into the deep end into the looney bin. I have been questioning that very thing myself. Why have I begun to entertain this stuff? Well, it's because none of the national commentators who I thoroughly respect will speak to these issues-- they avoid it like the plague. Whenever someone calls Rush, Levin, Hannity or Beck's show and asks about these supposed "conspiracy" theories, these great thinkers don't challenge the callers -- they simply hang up and then ridicule them. Well, for a truth seeker like me that just piques my curiosity. So, I set out to debunk and challenge these theories myself. As I stated earlier I am having a terrible time doing so. I've been so befuddled that I couldn't even rant about national news stories as usual! So, that explains my blog sabbatical. So at the risk of being labelled a "conspiracy theorist" (I've been called worst...lol) I'm going to share this information.
I apologize in advance because most of what I share will be re-posted material. I can't make this stuff up (so much for originality my friends) nor can I rant passionately about it because I'm still trying to figure out if it's fact or fiction. What I do know is that if I assume the hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil position
then I am choosing willful ignorance and that just isn't my style.
The first article I'm re-posting is an explanation of the agenda which I formerly believed was just the liberal left but according to this article it's Democrats and Republicans working together. It was written in by Tibor S. Friedman May 6, 2006 but it's still relevant (my comments in red):
The Biggest Con: Democrats & Republicans Work Together To Destroy America, Part 1 of 3
America is being destroyed by enemies within and with the help of a corrupted Congress and dumbed down (through public education and the corporate media), apathetic, indifferent and lazy public. The window for action to reverse the fascist trend of the last 50 years is fast closing and only an awake and vigilant citizenry can begin to comprehend and take action against the coming totalitarian devastation we have allowed to manifest in our country.
September 11, with the perpetrators in the shadow government and clandestine operations, signaled the final stages from the NWO (New World Order) cabal that they are now in a flight forward end game. The elders in this ‘open conspiracy’ for global totalitarian control of the planet, its peoples and resources, David Rockefeller, George H.W. Bush, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Henry Kissinger, Prince Philip, the Rothschild’s, and the rest are pushing for some major advancement in their diabolical agenda before their mortal demise.
Briefly, I will attempt to elaborate on three conclusions reached from my research: Democrats and Republicans are two home teams working for the same masters -- the enemies within; corporations and government (using the corporate media as their mind control tool) operate as one entity; and the New World Order (using the CFR, Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg, et al) is an open conspiracy to reduce the population of America (and the world), destroy American sovereignty and to create a totalitarian global government.
It will be useful to ask ourselves, while reading this, why our leaders -- both Democrats and Republicans alike -- after having sworn to uphold the Constitution and to protect America and the American people -- have deliberately worked together to destroy America and to what purpose have they made America a pariah in the world?(emphasis added)
The Duopoly . . . Two sides of the same Coin
Genocidal chemtrail spraying across the US, begun about 1996-1998 by Democrat Bill Clinton, continues unabated today and the recent passing of the un-PATRIOT Act by the Senate, with an overwhelming 89-10 vote in spite of the refusal to enforce it by more than 440 cities and counties, are two examples of shared criminality by the duopoly. Although the list of bipartisan crimes against Americans (and the world) is endless they share the common agenda of destroying America and an allegiance to the global banking elites through their membership in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group. These groups form the trinity in the globalization of the world by members who are involved in the highest levels of government, industry, academia, military and the media. (All of this is verifiable with a few clicks of the mouse)
Mordecai Zember’s list of the CFR 2005 membership reflects the cross-section of elites that control policy and propaganda in America today. Google also the list of members in the Trilateral Commission for 1973 and 2006; you will find Leonard Woodcock and John Sweeney on it -- leaders of the UAW and AFL-CIO, among others. How about Daniel Ellsberg being a member of the CFR? See “Sheep Dipping CFR style: The Kerry and Ellsberg Cases” for an interesting peek at the CIA.
As someone in the upcoming movie “From Freedom to Fascism” describes the duopoly, it is like the Gambinos and Genovese families who share the power and eat their gnocchi from the same plate. No offense to them; but this is how the system works as both parties advance the interests of the globalists, the International bankers and their corporate proxies. The politicians, who take their share of the plunder, are generally fronts who wrap themselves in the flag and patriotism as it serves their needs to accomplish their assignments received from their bosses behind the curtain -- the elites in the shadow government.
Staging Media Events and the Changing of the Guard
Meet the new boss; same as the old boss. (Well, that would explain Obama maintaining and expanding Bush's policies, I guess)
In America, the corporate media and their counterparts, the liberal gatekeepers, are preparing us for the changing of the guard. Remember six years into Bill Clinton’s neoliberal and globalist assault on Americans was the Monica sex circus that the media served up 24/7 to distract us from all the real serious crimes of the Clinton era. Which, in hindsight, seamlessly dovetailed with the Bush 2 agenda after his selection by the Supremes: the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) and the execution of 9/11, the illegal Afghan and Iraq wars (against non-threatening and, in the case of Iraq, sanction weakened, sovereign nations) and continued predator globalization (spreading ‘democracy’ via capitalism and so-called free trade). (Here is where I get all defensive but I'm trying to keep an open mind)
The elites (manipulating the elections) chose Bush -- twice. Now, almost six years into the fascist Bush 2 era we are witnessing both parties criticizing Bush (giving the sheeple false hopes, again) even as the corporate media begin propping up Hillary or McCain (what maverick?) or Edwards (or other globalist tools) as ‘alternatives’ to the madness in Washington. One cannot run for or become president without the approval of the elites. (Remember, this was written in 2006)
As Paul Joseph Watson warned us, ‘Hillary is the rat poison that will sink America.’ It matters not who is selected. The madness will continue unabated until America is totally destroyed for the international bankers and globalists and driven into the waiting arms of the UN -- created to institute a One World Government; achieving David Rockefeller’s long time dream and goal: controlling the world’s resources (monopoly) and the reduction of the world population through manipulated wars and bio-engineered diseases . . . and the enslavement of those that are allowed to remain to serve the elites. (Think about the fake Global Warming Crisis and Copenhagen)
We are and have been an occupied and fascist state -- the blending of corporations, banking and government. As Patrick Wood of the August Review, a research center for globalism, points out, ‘the Global Elite march in three essential columns: Corporate, Political and Academic.' Corporate determines the goals; Academia provides the white papers or propaganda for the Politicians to then sell to the unwitting citizens. Corporate media and all liberal gatekeepers are not only controlled by the CIA, but have members on their boards from all three groups to facilitate the manipulation of the desired public opinion. An example is a Carlyle (Bush family connected military industrial complex investment group) board member on the New York Times board; cross-pollination exists throughout the elite spectrum encompassing all aspects of finance and power. Everyone, those with their hands on the levers of power, is literally on the same page.
Welcome to the New World Order -- Ready or Not
David Rockefeller -- the godfather of the New World Order - a member of the Bilderbergers and the Council of Foreign Relations and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, thanked the media facilitators (most of whom are also members of one or more of these groups):
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years . . . It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated now and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto determination practiced in past centuries”
David Rockefeller gave this talk at the annual Bilderberg meeting in June 1991 held in Germany.
Alex Carey, an Australian scholar on propaganda techniques observed: "The 20th century has been characterized by three developments of great political importance: the growth of democracy, the growth of corporate power, and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate power against democracy."
It is clear that what has been a long and deliberate process has become evermore sophisticated in its manipulation of Americans and the world. For at least 100 years, America has been occupied by the Rockefellers, the Morgan’s, the Rothschild’s and other international bankers who have used their wealth and power (and by their illegal creation of the Federal Reserve and Income Tax Acts in 1913) to subvert America and humanity, in general, for their own greedy and nefarious purposes -- the documentation exists and only connecting the dots is needed.
The late William Cooper, a former military intelligence officer and world-renowned researcher, said this about the New World Order, "They are bound together by blood oaths, a secret religion, and the promise of an elite status within regional government, or the world supra government. Their religion is based upon the Kabbalah, the Luciferian Philosophy, and the worship of the Sun. They are not bound by any oath or allegiance save their own. They are loyal to no government or People save their own. And they are Citizens of no country save their already in place secret world government. In their words, 'If you are not one of us you are nothing.' To garner some sense of 'feel' for the concept see the movie 'They Live.'
"It is a largely 'open' conspiracy, in that much of its membership, structure, methods, and operations, are matters of public record, however scattered and obscure. Its manner of coordination is atypical. Two nuclei -- the elite core of the Wall Street clique (orbiting the House of Rockefeller) and the elite core of the European financial clique (orbiting the House of Rothschild) -- coordinate this global conspiracy by waging psychological warfare on the rest of the conspirators, telling each no more than is necessary for him to fulfill his designated role, often with explicit recognition neither of his role, nor of the unarticulated rules that govern him.
"Thus, the overwhelming bulk of the conspirators do not know, but only suspect, that they are part of and in service to a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."
Further he added: . . . emerging realities in 2006, "There will be no individual Rights only privileges. These will be granted or denied at will by the world supra government. All property is to be owned by the State. There will be a redistribution of wealth. They plan to eliminate class differences and reduce the standard of living to a lower level in the advanced nations, such as the United States, and to a higher standard of living in the so-called third world nations.
"This leveling of the standard of living will be accomplished through a global economic collapse which is in its beginning stages. The economic collapse will fulfill the goal of Marx and Engle’s' Communist Manifesto mandating the elimination of the middle class. The graduated income tax was the first implementation of this process and is one of the planks of the Communist Manifesto. NAFTA and GATT (add now CAFTA and the pending FTAA) are a part of this process encouraging industry to move into third-world nations in order to exploit cheap labor.
"All existing religions will disappear. The only religion will be the state religion (humanism or illuminism).
"All County and State governments will be eliminated and replaced with regional government. These regional governments (Home Rule) are already in place. Regionalism is gradually taking control throughout America.
"There will be no more cash. Trade will be accomplished by a system of computer credits with accounts accessed through debit cards or computer chip implants. The cards or implants will also serve as personal identification, drivers license, and etc. When this is completed the human race will be shackled to a computer in a never ending cycle of debt. No action or movement will ever again be private." The Constitution for the United States of America and its Bill of Rights will be scrapped. A parliamentary form of government will take its place. All military forces and individuals are to be disarmed except for an internal police force which will carry only the minimum weapons needed to maintain internal order. (Could that be why Obama and his ilk continually refer to the Constitution as a "living document?)
Although Cooper only lived to see a little more than a year of the Bush presidency, he was a firm advocate that President Clinton, although posing as a man of the people, was (and still is) in fact one of the biggest and most diabolical front men for the New World Order.
William Cooper, author of the classic, ‘Behold a Pale Horse’ was killed on November 5, 2001, by authorities at his home in Arizona.
Globalization, free trade and ‘spreading democracy’ are Trojan horses for the NWO/International Bankers true predatory intent. The fact that America's downward financial spiral started in earnest shortly after the Trilateral Commission was founded by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Breszinksi in 1973 is not incidental. The very policies that brought us the "New International Economic Order" (their own phrase) have wrecked our country. Trilateral member and Democratic President Jimmy Carter had 19 Trilateral members (including VP Mondale and Breszinksi as national security adviser) in his administration in 1976 and began David Rockefeller’s mission to de-industrialize America. The elites in fact have bankrupted (sold off) and destroyed America by off-shoring critical manufacturing enterprises and knowledge and technologies, which is continuing and is now, 30 years later, almost complete as the Big 3 auto manufacturers have been designed to collapse, further eroding America’s independence and vitality.
The (State) Media Lies
Joel Skousen (on his site) wrote recently that the media are completely in lockstep with the USG. I would add that we have been under the greatest psychological operations ever in the history of man, involving all levels of media -- corporate media and liberal gatekeepers. Information is the coin of the realm and our minders would rather have us believing their fiction and not what we may find in our research on the Internet.
The media lies and manipulates perceptions as a matter of course -- and as corporate-owned organs of the power elite structure they serve only to protect the status quo and those in power in their quest towards creating a New World Order and protecting their international banking interests.
The CIA’s annex, the Washington Post, and best patron, the late Katherine Graham, once remarked the world is a dangerous place and that democracy operates best when some details are not shared with the population. The WP and the New York Times, the lead so called ‘premier’ papers, operate similarly and are conduits of propaganda for the Powers That Be and their security apparatuses, and provide the ‘copy’ for all the other press in the US. The Daily News and New York Post -- comic book versions of the news -- are dumbed down propaganda rags for the ‘common man’ with loud headlines, plenty of mindless celebrity gossip and partially naked women to distract. TV land (including PBS, C-SPAN) and radio (like NPR) mimics repetitively (through all news and Sunday talk shows) the same official fictions that are disseminated in the press. The evening news on all of the alphabet channels is eerily alike in format and content -- by design, of course. (Is this not straight out of Orwells 1984?
. There was a whole chain of separate departments dealing with proletarian
literature, music, drama, and entertainment generally. Here were produced
rubbishy newspapers containing almost nothing except sport, crime and
astrology, sensational five-cent novelettes, films oozing with sex, and sentimental
songs which were composed entirely by mechanical means on a special kind
of kaleidoscope known as a versificator. There was even a whole sub-section —
Pornosec, it was called in Newspeak — engaged in producing the lowest kind of
pornography..)
Polls are used to fine tune messages/propaganda and are manipulated to reflect the desired public perception -- like the deliberate linkage of 9/11 and Iraq. Online CNN polls have been known to disappear after the results were not as expected -- suggesting that no matter the propaganda the public may not be buying it -- forcing the puppet meisters to recalibrate their propaganda efforts. The average citizen it is assumed will fall in line with the ‘majority’ view of a poll even though Joe Citizen has no way to confirm the poll. It is possible that the majority of people may consider that they are in the minority,.victims of the corporate media propaganda and poll manipulation, and remain silent about critical issues because of it.
The NWO and their political / media / clandestine operatives use a technique called Problem-Reaction-Solution where a situation is created for which the public demands a solution -- by orchestrating the problem and manipulating the reaction, a solution, originally desired, is effected. It accomplishes their goal while the public thinks they had some input. This process is repeated over and over and is evident in the current Immigrant demonstrations that have been organized by the elites at the top to foment unrest and division in America. Events are created and managed to accomplish the elite’s desired goals with the politicians and the corporate media as accomplices and facilitators -- all moving incrementally towards the creation of the New World Order.
Add to this the elite’s ownership of and control of media corporations, 40,000 lobbyists, hundreds of think tanks, the foundations, the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg and countless other groups that ‘control the dialogue’ and provide both parties (the duopoly) with mountains of propaganda to create distractions and wedge issues (abortion, gay marriage, illegal immigration, etc); or the latest ‘trivia news saturation’ (missing blondes, rapes at Duke, a Kennedy in rehab) while the greater issues of the day are conveniently disregarded. All this and more is arrayed against the lone American citizen struggling to understand what is happening to his country and the world. It is no wonder that the American citizen is not informed -- by design, of course.
Mark Twain once said that if one does not read the newspaper he is uninformed and misinformed if he does.
Nothing important gets into the corporate media unless officially created, sanctioned, approved or leaked on purpose.
Chuck Baldwin founder-pastor of Crossroad Baptist Church in Pensacola, Florida writes an extremely thought provoking article reposted below:
People of goodwill everywhere are rightly sympathetic to the plight of hundreds of thousands of innocent Haitians in the aftermath of the terrible earthquake that rocked the island country. Private donations and volunteer efforts are pouring into Haiti from all over the globe–especially from the United States. This is a good thing, right? So, why am I troubled?
Simply put, I cannot remember such an all-out “relief effort” by our nation’s military and government forces following a natural disaster anywhere–ever! Not even New Orleans, Louisiana, and surrounding Gulf Coast communities here in the homeland received the kind of attention from Washington, D.C., that Haiti is receiving.
According to Agence France-Press (AFP), “The US military is ramping up its mission in quake-hit Haiti, with 20,000 US troops expected to operate on ground and offshore by Sunday [January 24], the US commander overseeing the region said."
No doubt, this would include ships and personnel from the USS Carl Vinson carrier group. Cost to US taxpayers to send an entire carrier group–along with more than 20,000 (so far) military personnel–to Haiti already numbers in the multiplied millions of dollars. It is also almost certain that there will be no quick exit from the island nation. There never is. In other words, our military presence (dare I say occupation?) in Haiti will doubtless last for years. At least, that’s the way Latin American and European countries see it. And they are probably right.
Suffice it to say that the United States military is now completely in charge in Haiti. At this point, it would be very enlightening for everyone to read Walter Williams’ column dated January 20, 2010, entitled “Haiti’s Avoidable Death Toll.”
In short, Williams notes that the high death toll in Haiti is directly related to the inferior political/economic philosophies of the Haitian government. There is no economic liberty, which has relegated it to being one of the world’s poorest nations, with no opportunity to build the kind of homes and businesses that can withstand natural disasters. Williams is right when he says, “President Barack Obama called the quake ‘especially cruel and incomprehensible.’ He would be closer to the truth if he had said that the Haitian political and economic climate that make Haitians helpless in the face of natural disasters are ‘especially cruel and incomprehensible.’”
Williams also observes, “Corruption is rampant” in Haiti. Crime is, likewise, ubiquitous in Haiti, with little real law enforcement. Private property rights are nonexistent. Like many (if not most) third world countries, people live in tyranny and bondage to insensitive, power-mad strongmen who use up the country’s resources for their own selfish purposes. Tyranny always impoverishes people; freedom enriches them.
Williams rightly concludes, “Haiti’s disaster demands immediate Western assistance but it’s only the Haitian people who can relieve themselves of the deeper tragedy of self-inflicted poverty.” Amen.
All of that said, however, there are still several things bugging me about the Haiti story. For one thing, why was an earthquake of this magnitude not felt beyond Port-au-Prince?(The only reports saying tremors were felt out of Haiti belong to US-controlled sources.) All of the testimonies that I have read from people living in the adjoining country of the Dominican Republic (which shares the same island with Haiti) that were quoted by French, British, or Spanish outlets universally say they felt nothing. If the foreign press is reporting the story accurately, the devastation was almost exclusively contained in and around Port-au-Prince. That is very strange to me. Even most of the roads reportedly remained open after the quake. Very curious indeed.
Another oddity is the fact that this earthquake did not produce a tsunami. It is being called “miraculous” that an earthquake measuring 7.0 on the Richter Scale did not produce a colossal tsunami, which would have affected everyone in the region.
Furthermore, does the French government know something that we don’t–but should? According to a report of the Global Analysis International Intelligence (GAII), “Not coincidentally, Agence France-Press (AFP), which of course is closely affiliated with French intelligence, filed a report on 14th January which contained the following concluding sentence: “‘On Wednesday, Obama ordered a “swift, coordinated and aggressive effort to save lives” in Haiti following the murderous quake, as a massive US aid mission swung into action, using troops, naval forces, aircraft and rescue teams.’
“FACT: An ‘act of God,’ or natural calamity, is NOT a ‘murderous quake.’
“The use of the word MURDEROUS here implies that someone is doing the MURDERING.”
GAII further speculates that the earthquake may have been the work of US Black Ops, which “flattened the French embassy and many of its officials, imploded the United Nations’ own establishments in the Haitian capital, and no doubt obliterated evidence of US Government and rogue official drug-running complicity . . . channeled through the Haitian capital for many years.”
Intelligence reports are also circulating about the possible disruption of liens and seizures of trillions of dollars by the international community relative to past crimes committed by former Presidents George Bush I and II, and Bill Clinton, which were being channeled through Haiti’s Central Bank. If any of this is even remotely true, it is certainly more than convenient that the Haitian capital was destroyed.
This particular part of the story is a real sore spot with me. And I know if I broach this topic, many readers (especially my Christian brethren who live under the delusion that the Bush family can do no wrong) will refuse to believe anything I report and will even take their anger and umbrage out on me. So be it. Ahem, Guilty. But I an slowing and reluctantly emerging from the false right/left matrix.
I am personally convinced that certain members of the Bush and Clinton families have been involved in the international smuggling of illicit drugs for decades. I have spoken in confidence with those who were in positions to know, and they have emphatically told me that both then-Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton and then-President George H.W. Bush were complicit in CIA-assisted drug running out of Mena, Arkansas. (You don’t think I would say this if I did not have absolute confidence in the integrity and credibility of these sources, do you? Plus, why would they tell me this at potential great harm to themselves, if it were not true? And, no, I cannot divulge their names, for obvious reasons.) And there is absolutely no reason to believe that similar operations are not ongoing. In my opinion, it would be utterly na�ve to think otherwise.
After all, it has been often reported that the CIA used Army Special Forces troops to facilitate the smuggling of drugs out of Indochina during the Vietnam War, has it not? Yes, it has. That rogue elements within the US government would use war–or even earthquakes–as cover and facilitation for illegal drug smuggling or money laundering would not surprise me one bit.
I realize it is extremely difficult for many Americans to contemplate that members of their own federal government could be evil enough to be involved in anything such as is implied above. According to the thinking of many Americans, evil people only live in Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, or North Korea. And, of course, that is exactly what government propagandists want us to believe. (emphasis added by CBW) You bet it's difficult. I am literally assaulted by all of the information I've been gathering of late related to these types of operations.
The truth is, no country or people has a monopoly on sin. As the prophet Jeremiah was inspired to say, “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?” (Jeremiah 17:9) The Apostle Paul agreed. He told the Philippians, “We . . . have no confidence in the flesh.” (Philippians 3:3)
Thomas Jefferson said virtually the same thing when he said, “In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” This is why Jefferson and the rest of America’s founders insisted that we should be diligent to hold our civil magistrates accountable to the limits and protections of the US Constitution. They well understood the sentiments so wisely expressed by Lord Acton, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.” Christians, of all people, should understand this. (emphasis added)
So, why are so many of us so quick to believe everything our government and their toadies in the national media are telling us? Are we so na�ve as to believe that unregenerate politicians in Washington, D.C., are incapable of the same evil acts of barbarity and savagery that might be found in other parts of the world? Are sinners less sinful because they happened to receive their fallen nature from American bloodlines? (emphasis added)
Am I saying that Black Ops personnel manufactured the earthquake in Haiti–and killed tens of thousands of people in the process–for the purpose of hiding or facilitating illegal activity? No, I am not. How in the world would I know it, even if it were true?
What I am saying is that, once again, for me, there are many things that do not add up regarding what is going on in Haiti. The way the earthquake behaved; the lack of related seismic and tsunamic activity usually associated with earthquakes of this magnitude; the unprecedented involvement of US military forces being used for “relief efforts” even as commanders are desperate to fill combat theaters in Iraq and Afghanistan; the occupation of another independent nation, which occurred at lightning speed; the vast sums of US taxpayer dollars being expended; the devastation done to key Haitian governmental and banking institutions–which were known to be conduits for international financial disbursements–with virtually no devastation experienced anywhere else; and intelligence reports of surreptitious activity circulating all over Europe and Latin America all add up to one big question, What’s really going on in Haiti? (Source)
I think H.A.A.R.P happened in Haiti, what do you think?
According to Julianne Malveaux Climate Change is a civil rights issue. That is without a doubt the biggest kettle of horse dung I've read in quite sometime. This is preposterous on so many levels that my mind is reeling in bewilderment laced with amusement due to the absurdity and awe at the unmitigated gall of black intelligentsia (I use that term loosely). She is no better than a dope dealer in my opinion. She is pushing a drug of sorts a "grievance" opiate that so many of us black folks are addicted to. Whatever, it takes for us to achieve the "victim" high -- right Ms. Malveaux. It's horrifying that as the President of Bennett College that Julianne Malveaux is shaping the minds of young black women. She is the greatest example of a sell-out as she executes the dictates of Adolf Hitler who wrote: "All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach."
What do the "least intelligent" black folks understand best? Racism. Both real and imagined.
She writes: "Climate change is more than an environmental issue. It is a human rights and economic justice issue. Why? Because though climate change impacts all of us, different nations, and different communities within nations, experience the effects of climate change in varying ways, some worse than others."
Notice how what used to be called "Global Warming" is now "Climate Change" since the weather isn't cooperating with Al Gore and the UN's hoax. They have opted to change the name in an effort to hide the fact their data is cooked, contrived, bogus and dead wrong. Isn't it curious how they claim that CO2 levels are rising but the global temperatures are not rising as predicted? Hmm....how do they get around that? Diversion is how. They start a dialogue about social injustice. Historically it's worked like a charm. They employ influential black people (Margaret Sanger used black ministers) to carry the message (propagandize) to the masses and before you know it Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid cut deals behind closed doors and legislation is pushed through whether the people who are wise to their devices like it or not.
She continues: "This point was clearly made at last month's U.N. climate change conference in Copenhagen, where it quickly became evident that the rich and powerful nations — particularly the U.S. and members of the European Union — dictate the debate at the expense of poorer countries. That needs to change."
So according to Ms. Malveaux and the UN poorer countries should be able to force the United States (who will be a poorer country if Obama acheives his goals) to give them our wealth ( I hear a Van Jones loop playing in my head -- "give them the wealth, give them the wealth"). How is this not wealth distribution also known as Socialism? It is wrong according to Ms. Malveaux that the US should dictate the debate. The debate should be dictated by Zimbabwe or Chad or some other 3rd world country apparently via international treaty-- United States sovereignty be damned.
She also writes: "Robert Bullard, who runs an environmental justice program at Clark Atlanta University, has noted that the adverse impacts of climate change fall most heavily on people of color who are concentrated in urban centers, coastal regions and areas where the air quality is poor."
What does climate change and pollution (poor air quality) have to do with each other? Oh, silly me how could I have forgotten. According to the Socialist religion known as Global Climate Change the Earth is over-populated which leads to too many people breathing and exhaling the pollutant known as Carbon Dioxide (CO2). So if one were to follow this to it's logical conclusion then we'd understand why abortion is so important and necessary (especially in the black community where 80% of the abortuaries are located). No wonder China has a one child rule -- coming soon to America folks. What about all those old people exhaling CO2? Do you think ObamaCare will go green and give the aged a little "nudge" by informing them of there duty to die in order to improve the air quality and all? It's sounds absurd but following the logical path and our current tract how far-fetched is it really. I'm sure 30 years ago same-sex marriage was absurd. Hey, that fits into the paradigm as well because same sex couples can't procreate little "breathers" who pollute the enviroment.
Fortunately, however God is on the throne! He sits high and He looks low (real low). So in that knowledge, I'll try not to get so angry and riled up remembering Who is in control.
I can sum that up in nicely in four words but let's take it to the streets:
Part I
Part II
How sad is it that none of the respondents could offer an apologetic based on facts. Just vague generalities such as "he is doing a marvelous job" or "they (the republicans) won't let him do his job". I hate to be hard on that really nice old guy but he is completely uninformed (I'm purposely not saying "dumb as a box a rocks" but feel free to infer my sentiment).
I have never been so embarrassed and ashamed of my people as I have been since Obama came on the scene. Racism chasers will say that I'm self-hating because I reject the collective ignorance of black folks who voted and will vote again for Barack Obama for two reasons -- because he is black and/or because they are uninformed. It doesn't occur to them I suppose that those who find "hope" in the person of Barack Obama are pretty darn deficient the in "self-love" department. Those black folks who can and undoubtedly will offer an apologetic based on facts are either Socialist, Communist, Maoist, or of some other equally deviant persuasion. Unfortunately, however I'm sure that considerably less than 50% of those who still support the POTUS fall into that egregious category. Seriously, how sad is it that the interviewer was able to get the kindly old gentleman to confess his conservatism -- he's no socialist, maoist communist deviant -- he is a conservative. Why doesn't he vote that way? Again, two reasons -- racist or stupid (perhaps both).
For the record, this is my darn blog and I am under on compulsion to adhere to contrived politically correct decorum. So go suck an egg if you don't like it.
Alex Jones who I've been listening to quite a bit of late discusses the left\right paradigm. As much as I'd like to reject Alex Jones as a "conspiracy kook" it's difficult as his assertions are generally pretty plausible. Like most people, I like the "good" guys and the "bad" guys clearly defined in my mind. Accepting that the ideologues on the left and the right really aren't so different at all and that "We the People" are mere pawns is pretty unsettling (at least for me.....)
I received the video below this morning in an email from a friend who routinely forwards jokes. To him this is just a video about the state of the US Job market-- just a joke. In his mind President Obama is more than capable of turning everything around and he is confident that the economy and job market are going to recover because finally we have a "capable" POTUS (his words not mine):
Regrettably, I had to share information with my friend that only made him angry with me. Why do President Obama's supporters get pissed off when you share information with them? Do facts confuse them or something? In this case, I shared a quote from page 135 of Dreams of My Father where Obama writes:
"Eventually a consulting house to multinational corporations agreed to hire me as a research assistant. Like a spy behind enemy lines, I arrived at my mid-Manhattan office and sat at my computer terminal..."
My friend promptly advised me that I am taking this quote out of context and contends that "most black people" feel uncomfortable in corporate America. Good grief... here we go again with the "most black people" spiel. So I had to ask my friend -- Are "most black people"pro-affirmative action as well? If so, why? Since "most black people" are uncomfortable in corporate America?" Well, that didn't go over well and he vowed never to send me email again because of my uber-annoying propensity of turning the most mundane and harmless things into "Anti-Obama propaganda". Unfettered and slightly insulted, I sent him the following graph and shared even more "Anti-Obama propaganda":
Only a mere 8% of Obama's cabinet appointments have private sector experience. Why, because Obama and his minions believe that the government is the answer to all societal woes. He believes that government should house, feed, provide health care and CONTROL society. However, I cannot think of a single problem that has been effectively solved by government -- without creating an even bigger problem in the process.
Bill Burch, chairman of GRIT (the Grass Roots Institute of Texas) wrote that "we need to understand the thinking of the new Marxist Democrats and how they differ from the past. First, as a basis for their thinking, they believe "from each according to his ability and to each according to his need (Karl Marx, 1875)." We also need to understand the difference between a Marxist Democrat and a liberal Democrat." He continues, "a liberal Democrat believes that the government is responsible for helping each individual achieve his goals and freedoms. The Marxist Democrat believes that the individual is responsible to society as a whole and to help government achieve its goals." Do you recall President Elect Obama advising that our "individual salvation depends on our collective salvation"? We are not dealing with your run of the mill liberal democrat anymore in fact at this point I'd welcome a liberal democrat. What we have on our hands now (thanks to the hopeful, the uniformed, and the just plain stupid) is a Marxist who despises America and seeks to "fundamentally transform it".
"Denmark Vesey said ... After the Emancipation Proclamation, only a handful of freed slaves immediately separated themselves from their former masters. Lacking either the resources or will to be free, the vast majority elected not to leave the security and safety of the plantation.
These partially emancipated slaves (sharecroppers) transitioned to a new economic and political reality, that bound them to the land, made them politically impotent, and kept them in perpetual debt. Stuck in the matrix of a simultaneously adversarial yet completely dependent relationship with the Plantation, these people became the first Plantation Negros.
The Plantation Negro reasoned, at least he could eat, even though he was not free. They were fed a diet designed to keep them alive, while costing the plantation as little as possible. However, early plantation negros were resilient and resourceful. They were able to supplement their diets with organic vegetables and naturally raised animals.
As the summer of the agrarian era evolved into a cold industrial winter, Plantation Negros developed relationships with the Factory. In exchange for safety and security, the Factory ensured the Plantation Negro a home. However, he remained politically impotent and as he was integrated into the culture of consumption, he became increasingly in debt.
Again, the Plantation Negro reasoned even though he was not free, at least he could eat. Tragically, now living in urban areas, the Plantation Negro was not able to supplement his diet by working the earth. The Factory filled this void by manufacturing cheap processed food which destroyed the organs of Plantation Negros and made disease inevitable. Now, added to the cost of housing and food, the Plantation Negro suddenly found himself saddled by something called Health Care costs.
What promised to be the spring of the Digital era witnessed a change in the relationship between the Plantation Negro and the Factory. It became a relationship between the Plantation Negro and the Corporation. In exchange for safety and security, the Plantation Negro was able to get multiple mortgages, credit cards, and school loans so the Plantation could educate his children.
Although he remained politically impotent and in insurmountable debt the Plantation Negro reasoned he could at least get Health Care.
As the bubble of the Digital era pops, the Plantation Negro finds himself wading in the tumultuous waters of economic upheaval, social collapse and an impending tsunami of disease. The Plantation that became the Factory which became the Corporation is now masquerading as the Government.
In exchange for safety and security, the Government provides housing by insuring mortgages, it finances debt and educates children. As an extension of its patronage, the Corpaorate / Government will continue to feed Plantation Negros an increasingly toxic diet of genetically modified food and prescription drugs, that not only makes them sick, but appears to sterilize the Plantation Population as well.
This year the Plantation / Factory / Corporate / Government is introducing a new product. It is called National (Plantation) Health Care. Sadly Plantation Negros think the same people who poisoned them are actually offering an antidote."
Glenn Beck has invited Black Conservatives to a taping of his show on tomorrow November 12th which will air on Friday the 13th. The title of the show is "Time To Be Heard"...well, I'll say! I'm very excited to meet all of the bloggers that I so admire. Gary at A Time For Choosing posted this picture on his blog (but he didn't include me, so I included myself...lol) titled "Glen Beck's Friday 13th Nightmare For Liberals Across America: Beck Hosts Prominent Black Conservatives"
Good looking out Gary! Thanks for spreading the word.
Perhaps I can replace Prof. Mark Lamont Hill. At least I'm a REAL conservative. Maybe I'll be able to convince Glenn with put in a word for me with his bosses at Fox...lol.
The basic concept of Communism is that the idea of God is irrelevant and only to be "tolerated" as an accommodation to those of "low mentality". That explains the contempt that the Left has for Christians or right-wing nuts as we are routinely described. It explains the elitist mentality of our Communist-in-Chief, who had the unmitigated gall to say that America is not a Christian nation. Communism and communist deny the existence of any form of deity, believing that only matter in motion is eternal and the only divinity is a directive force inherent in matter which is why they worship the Earth. These Leftist worship the "created things" rather than the Creator.
Yes, I maintain that communism is the religion of the Godless and it even has it's own plan of salvation which is Utopia. The Communist vainly believes that he'll transform the heart of man by providing for all of man's material needs for him. Think back to October 31, 2008 when then President Elect Barack Obama proclaimed before an enthusiastic congregation crowd "We are five days away from fundamentally transforming America". Which read to the sychophantic drones as "our help" "our saviour" has come.
Communist even have a doctrine of conversion...indoctrinate the youth. In fact our colleges and universities are veritable alters of conversion. I can tell you that for me that was the case as an undergraduate. I was Godless and wanted and in point of fact sought out righteousness, goodness and justice as long as no diety was involved. Communism was perfect.
Communists also have a standard of consecration, and self-discipline. It was Lenin who said, "Few and better." and "We won't accept into membership anybody with any reservations whatsoever. We won't accept into our membership anyone unless he is an active, disciplined, working member in one of our organizations." Now remember Michelle Obama saying "Barack will require you to work". Have you noticed how the state run media has begun to call Americans "workers"?
It's a shame that drones are so busy protecting and defending the "first black president" that they are complete oblivious to the forces at play in our nation.
The mainstream media thought that the membership of Todd Palin, who is not a candidate for any office, in the Alaska Independence Party important enough to report in such outlets as the Los Angeles Times, MSNBC, and the New York Times, among others.
So now that Barack Obama's membership in the far left New Party has been unearthed, will they report his membership in that Socialist organization?
Proof of Obama's membership in the New Party was discovered by the Politically Drunk On Power blog:
In June sources released information that during his campaign for the State Senate in Illinois, Barack Obama was endorsed by an organization known as the Chicago "New Party". The 'New Party' was a political party established by the Democratic Socialists of America (the DSA) to push forth the socialist principles of the DSA by focusing on winnable elections at a local level and spreading the Socialist movement upwards. The admittedly Socialist Organization experienced a moderate rise in numbers between 1995 and 1999. By 1999, however, the Socialist 'New Party' was essentially defunct after losing a supreme court challenge that ruled the organizations "fusion" reform platform as unconstitutional.
After allegations surfaced in early summer over the 'New Party's' endorsement of Obama, the Obama campaign along with the remnants of the New Party and Democratic Socialists of America claimed that Obama was never a member of either organization. The DSA and 'New Party' then systematically attempted to cover up any ties between Obama and the Socialist Organizations. However, it now appears that Barack Obama was indeed a certified and acknowledged member of the DSA's New Party.
On Tuesday, I discovered a web page that had been scrubbed from the New Party's website. The web page which was published in October 1996, was an internet newsletter update on that years congressional races. Although the web page was deleted from the New Party's website, the non-profit Internet Archive Organization had archived the page.
From the October 1996 Update of the DSA 'New Party': "New Party members are busy knocking on doors, hammering down lawn signs, and phoning voters to support NP candidates this fall. Here are some of our key races...
Illinois: Three NP-members won Democratic primaries last Spring and face off against Republican opponents on election day: Danny Davis (U.S. House), Barack Obama (State Senate) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary)."
You can find the above quote from the scubbed New Party web page at this Internet Archive Organization link. More confirmation of Obama's membership in the New Party can be found at an article in the November 1996 Progressive Populist magazine:
New Party members and supported candidates won 16 of 23 races, including an at-large race for the Little Rock, Ark., City Council, a seat on the county board for Little Rock and the school board for Prince George's County, Md. Chicago is sending the first New Party member to Congress, as Danny Davis, who ran as a Democrat, won an overwhelming 85% victory. New Party member Barack Obama was uncontested for a State Senate seat from Chicago.
The Democratic Socialist Party of America also reported on Obama's New Party membership in its July/August 1996 edition:
The Chicago New Party is increasely becoming a viable political organization that can make a different in Chicago politics. It is crucial for a political organization to have a solid infrastructure and visible results in its political program. The New Party has continued to solidify this base.
First, in relation to its infrastructure, the NP's membership has increased since January '95 from 225 to 440. National membership has increased from 5700 in December '95 to 7000. Currently the NP's fiscal balance is $7,000 and receives an average of $450/month is sustainer donations.
Secondly, the NP's '96 Political Program has been enormously successful with 3 of 4 endorsed candidates winning electoral primaries. All four candidates attended the NP membership meeting on April 11th to express their gratitude. Danny Davis, winner in the 7th Congressional District, invited NPers to join his Campaign Steering Committee. Patricia Martin, who won the race for Judge in 7thSubcircuit Court, explained that due to the NP she was able to network and get experienced advice from progressives like Davis. Barack Obama, victor in the 13th State Senate District, encouraged NPers to join in his task forces on Voter Education and Voter Registration. The lone loser was Willie Delgado, in the 3rd Illinois House District. Although Delgado received 45% of the vote, he lost by only 800 votes. Delgado commented that it was due to the NP volunteers that he carried the 32nd Ward. Delgado emphasized that he will remain a visible community activist in Humbolt Park. He will conduct four Immigration workshops and encouraged NP activists to get involved.
Kudos to Politically Drunk On Power for digging up this information about Obama's membership in the socialist New Party. The question now is if the MSM will deem his party membership important enough to report on. They sure didn't hesitate to report on Todd Palin's membership in the Alaska Independence Party.
UPDATE: Yet more proof of Obama's close involvement in the socialist New Party from NewsBusters' Hermano who provided this link to the Chicago Democratic Socialists of American September-October 1995 New Ground 42 edition:
About 50 activists attended the Chicago New Party membership meeting in July. The purpose of the meeting was to update members on local activities and to hear appeals for NP support from four potential political candidates. The NP is being very active in organization building and politics. There are 300 members in Chicago. In order to build an organizational and financial base the NP is sponsoring house parties. Locally it has been successful both fiscally and in building a grassroots base. Nationwide it has resulted in 1000 people committed to monthly contributions. The NP's political strategy is to support progressive candidates in elections only if they have a concrete chance to "win". This has resulted in a winning ratio of 77 of 110 elections. Candidates must be approved via a NP political committee. Once approved, candidates must sign a contract with the NP. The contract mandates that they must have a visible and active relationship with the NP.
The political entourage included Alderman Michael Chandler, William Delgado, chief of staff for State Rep Miguel del Valle, and spokespersons for State Sen. Alice Palmer, Sonya Sanchez, chief of staff for State Sen. Jesse Garcia, who is running for State Rep in Garcia's District; and Barack Obama, chief of staff for State Sen. Alice Palmer. Obama is running for Palmer's vacant seat.
So Obama signed a contract with the New Party? Verrrry interesting.
—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmieFUnnies blog. (source)
I don't know why I bothered......most of the "government educated/indoctrinated" Obama supporters don't have a problem with Socialism. Hell, some of them even theorize that Socialism is biblical!
Do you think that is a preposterous question? If this question were posed a few short months ago, I would have thought so -- but no more. What's worse is that unless one avails themselves to alternative media sources they would have no idea that "We the People" of the United States of America are in great danger of surrendering our sovereignty to an international entity. The warm and fuzzy phrase which is hallowed throughout the halls of academia and echoed during convocation ceremonies routinely of "global citizenship" is about to become a reality for the United States of America. As much as it pains me to go all "Alex Jones" on you this is true. In December of 2009 at the United Nations Climate Summit in Copenhagen, there is a very strong probability that President Obama will sign a treaty that will trump the powers of the US Constitution, if the signed treaty is ratified by the Senate.
Lord Christopher Monckton, former policy adviser to Margaret Thatcher warned of the impending danger last week as he addressed the Free Market Institute at Bethel University...
Did you catch that? He said:
"I have read that treaty. And what it says is this: That a world government is going to be created. The word "government" actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to countries, in satisfaction of what is called, coyly, "a climate debt," because we have been burning CO2 and they haven't and we've been screwing up the climate. We haven't been screwing up the climate, but that's the line. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government is "enforcement." How many of you think that the word "election" or "democracy" or "vote" or "ballot" occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right! It doesn't appear once. So at last the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement and took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year because they'd captured it. Now the apotheosis is at hand.They are about to impose a communist world government on the world.You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He's going to sign. He'll sign anything. He's a Nobel peace laureate. Of course he'll sign it! So, thank you, You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege merely to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free. But in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your prosperity away forever -- and neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect would have any power whatsoever to take it back again. That is how serious it is." (emphasis added)
The entire speech can be viewed here and the accompanying power point presentation can be viewed here
I was accused a few threads ago of sounding like a "looney right wing kook" for referring to President Obama's affinity for all things socialist . I can not fathom how Obama supporters can't see the obvious. But, it's gravely important that they now take off the blinders and take a stand against this diabolical agenda . Our very SOVEREIGNTY AS A NATION is imperiled. Our economic policies as well as our energy policies will be subordinated to what the world body at the United Nations says we can or cannot do.
So the questions dujour for Obama supporters and racism chasers (not necessarily the same) are -- Do you love Barack Obama more than you love America's sovereignty? Do you really want America to surrender it's economic prosperity to third world countries? Do you really believe that YOU owe a debt to poorer countries because you breathe? Right, the liberal lie is that CO2 (our very breath) creates green house gases which in turn cause global warming and millions are dying because of our greenhouse gas emission. If you think I'm distorting this inane liberal lie read for yourself:
"If we do not reach a deal over the next few months let us be in no doubt since once the damage from one checked emissions growth is done no retrospective global agreement in some future period can undo that choice. By then, it will be irretrievably too late. We should never allow ourselves to lose sight of the catastrophe we face if present warming trends continue. Ninety-eight percent of those dying and otherwise seriously affected live in the poorest countries and yet their countries account for only 8% of global emissions. This is the great injustice of climate change. Those being hit first and hardest by climate change are those who have done least to cause it." - Gordon Brown, Prime Minister United Kingdom
So according to the liberal liars the poor nations of the world are poor because of America's CO2 emissions. No. The truth is these nations are poor because of corruption, tyranny, socialism and the lack of wealth creation. The United Nation's wants to cut America down to size and our Nobel Peace Laureate POTUS is down for the cause.
I really like this guy Lee Doren. I think he used to run a blog called Copious Dissenter but I can no longer find it on my reader. Anyway, enjoy his video, consider subscribing to his page.
Just feeling a little silly tonight....and I really wanted to share the snarky message left for my by a "fri-enemy". I wish the sound were better but I'm a little retarded where technology is concerned.
After speaking with friends and family this weekend it became increasingly clear to me that even Obama supporters initially scratched their heads and wondered what prompted the Peace Prize Committee to give the award to President Barack Obama. However, they have concluded that the accomplishment of becoming the first Black American President is so transformative that hope has been restored to the hearts of black people here and abroad and that phenomenon in and of itself is the reason that President Obama is the deserving chosen recipient. How touching... No, I can't make this stuff up, these are the sentiments of my beloved familiars.
I feel compelled to set the record straight. The REAL reason that the Socialist Norwegian Parliament gave the Nobel Peace Prize to President Obama was to make a political statement that they affirm his socialist agenda and his approach to foreign policy. This is a thinly veiled attempt to influence American foreign policy.
The fact that Obama worshippers supporters are dumb naive enough to think that these socialist Norwegian's give a tinker's damn about "hope in the hearts of black folks" is just laughable.
Just a little something to think about. If you don't see yourself in any of this then there is no reason to be angry, right?
Part 1
PART 2
There is a part 3 -- but I don't like it. Too much talk about queens & goddesses, which in my humble opinion is just foolish talk.
It's been said that if you are not part of the solution then you are part of the problem. Well, in this case I'm not sure that's true. We can't make choices for other people and choices make all the difference.
Most Obama supporters really should know the answer and probably do -- but since they actually believe that the "Magic Negro" Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm is going to save the world and all it's ills they do not listen to the still quiet voice of reason within which advises them that this new health care plan and it's public option SUCKS.
Gaius Lawrenitis Negris over at the Magic Negro Watch blog posted the results of the following study below"
A chart showing the major carriers and how Medicare compared to them in the study follows:
Well, well.
The Medicare denial rate found in the study was, on a weighted average basis, roughly 1.7 times that of all of the private carriers combined (99,025 divided by 2,447,216 is 4.05%; 6.85% divided by 4.05% =1.69).
You would think Medicare's sheer size might enable it to have smoother procedures with its providers that would enable it to turn down a lower percentage of claims. But no, this is the government we're talking about.
So who's the most "heartless" now? And why should Americans accept the idea of gradually being forced into a government-run system when, based on documented government experience, they will be more likely to see their claims denied?
And I didn't even get to the idea of refusals to treat in the first place, something that is present to some degree in virtually every state-run system, but is currently against the law in hospital emergency rooms in the U.S."(Source)
Funny how President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank and others have demonized insurance companies and claimed that unisured individuals are dying because they don't have health insurance. But they don't discuss how the Gov't's existing public option is at the top of the list for denying claims. Oh.....the irony of it all.
