He asks: "Who the hell do you think you are?" I can answer that -- he thinks he is above the law -- because well, he is. He is the front man for the international banking cabal that has taken over our government, he is the "undertaker" that is draining the life blood from the United States of America, he is the protected one, the untouchable. Personally, the burning question I have for the President is "how can you sleep at night knowing that a nation of black folks trust you, believe in you, and have sadly and strangely somehow invested their black pride in you?" (Biggie Smalls is in my head right now singing "It was all a dream.....") It is utterly amazing how black folks co-sign anything this fraudulent, treasonous, peace-prize toting puppet usurper does --Why? Because he is the Great Black(ish) Hope.
I posted a link to this video on my facebook page and was promptly advised by an Obama acolyte that "Qhaddafi is certfiable [sic], we should be doing more to have him removes." Uggghhhh.....do you see what I mean? This attack is eerily similar to Bush's 2003 attack on Iraq but that wasn't OK. Where is the outrage? This attack hasn't a damn thing to do with humanitarianism and everything to do with advancing the agenda of the United Nations and the international banking cabal that employs Presidents even those who are unconstitutionally ineligible. By the way, just for kicks check out what Farrakhan had to say about the POSER POTUS in 2008:
I read this outstanding and insightful piece this morning and I can't stop thinking about it so I decided to post it. It is written by Larkin Rose who contributes at Freedomsphoenix.com:
The ongoing discussion of the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords makes an outstanding example of the utter insanity and profound hypocrisy which the belief in "government" creates. Specifically, nearly all the related discussions about violence have turned reality upside-down, backwards, and inside out. Leftists are having conniption fits about the political ads by Sarah Palin, showing Giffords in "crosshairs," screaming that that counts as advocating violence. There are several ways in which this complaint is completely batty.
1) Leftist constantly advocate violence. "Taxation," as one example, is the forced confiscation of wealth backed by the threat of violence. Those who timidly cooperate with the mere threat never see the violence in their face, but take it from someone who has had his home forcibly invaded by armed IRS agents: "taxation" is backed by men with guns, who are quite willing to use violence to get their way. When all those leftists who support the very system of "taxation" that resulted not only in an armed invasion of my home, but in me being caged for a year, whine about a stupid political ad, the level of hypocrisy makes me want to vomit.
2) Right-wing statists, like Sarah Palin, also constantly advocate violence, in the form of various "laws" and authoritarian actions. Gabrielle Giffords herself was part of the federal war-mongering committee, which constantly advocates a double-dose of violence: violence used to force all Americans, including pacifists, to fund overt violence overseas. Bizarrely, instead of being criticized for that--instead of being taken to task for advocating aggression against hundreds of millions of Americans and the murder of lots of foreigners--Sarah Palin is being attacked for a stupid campaign ad. Holy smokes, people! Could your priorities and perspectives possibly be any more screwed up?!
3) There is a moral difference between aggressive force--initiating violence against someone who hasn't threatened or harmed anyone--and using defensive force. The vast majority of "government" violence, advocated by the "left" and the "right," is unjustified, immoral aggressive force. But again, statists from both sides, being believers in the cult of "government," don't think it counts as violence, because in their eyes, it's not being committed by mere people, but by the mystical, magical, superhuman entity known as "government." And most people imagine that it has the right to do things which mere mortals do not.
Defensive force, even deadly force if necessary, is both moral and justified. And whether it's "legal" or not makes no difference. What this means is that, when the thugs wearing the label of "government" commit aggression, resisting them by any means necessary is absolutely justified. As a practical matter, I would almost always advise against it, because resistors will almost always be caged, and often killed, for daring to resist "legal" aggression. But whether it's a good idea in practical terms (which it usually isn't), and whether it's moral (which it is), are different issues.
The end result is that I'm watching the insane national argument over the Giffords shootings, as one who believes that defensive force--even if "illegal" and even if used against "law enforcers"--is justified. Meanwhile, both groups of people who are constantly advocating the use of aggressive violence are arguing over something that was not an example of advocating violence (political rhetoric and ads). It's just too weird to take.
Gabrielle Giffords herself was directly involved in exerting aggressive violence, overseas and here, against non-violent people, via war-mongering, "taxation," forcibly interfering with the medical industry, and so on. She was not an innocent. She was an advocate of widespread, perpetual, forcible aggression. But being a devout statist, I'm guessing that she truly believed that the violence she was helping to commit didn't count as violence, because it was called "law," and done in the name of "authority." That's a perfect example of what The Most Dangerous Superstition leads to: basically good people do evil things, and don't even notice.
So one set of people who constantly advocate violence (Democrats) are complaining about another set of people who constantly advocate violence (Republicans), based on something that is not the advocacy of violence (the political ads). It's like one gang of thieves criticizing another gang of thieves for committing a crime they didn't actually commit. How weird can it get? Statists, "left" and "right," advocate constant, wide-spread violence against millions of people, but they genuinely imagine, having been indoctrinated into state-worship, that it doesn't count as violence because it is being done by the deity called "government," which they imagine to be exempt from human morality.
As if that wasn't looney enough, there has also been the predictable clamor of people who say that the Gifford shooting proves that we need more "gun control." The belief in "authority" allows otherwise rational people to openly declare that they abhor violence, while saying they want guns "outlawed." They fail to notice the glaring contradiction therein.
Every "law" ("gun control" or otherwise) is not a suggestion, or a request, but a threat of violence, which will be enforced by men with guns. Putting it in question form makes "gun control" advocates squirm: If I keep a firearm even when it's "illegal" to do so (and I would), so that I can protect my family from aggressors, what do you "gun control" proponents advocate be done to me if I get caught? Do you advocate that someone give me a stern talking to? Do you advocate that people ask me nicely to disarm myself? Or do you advocate that I be forcibly captured and put in a cage? And if I resist that--which I would--do you advocate that I be killed? If you don't mind, please don't advocate that I be murdered, while claiming that you abhor violence. And don't advocate someone shooting me, while saying you hate gun violence. Doing so is both immoral and insane.
"Gun control" is violence enforced with guns. In other words, so-called "gun control" is gun violence. Ask a Branch Davidian about this, if you can find one who the feds haven't murdered yet. Or ask Randy Weaver. Ask him how compassionate and peace-loving "gun control" is. If you don't know what I'm talking about, turn off your statist-controlled TV long enough to do an internet search, and see "gun control" in action.
To be blunt, the opinions of the average American regarding morality, violence and justice are warped and twisted to the point of being about as backward as they could possibly be. The good news is that this is not the result of individual stupidity or malice. It is the result of life-long indoctrination into the cult of "government." If you love humanity, and consider yourself peace-loving, I dare you to read "The Most Dangerous Superstition." You may find that your good intentions and noble virtues are being used against you, to the extreme detriment of humanity. You may find that all the pain and suffering that you see in the world, all the injustice you want to end, is feeding off of you. If that were the case, would you want to know? Or would you rather cling to whatever you already believe, regardless of the harm it may be doing to others? Again, I dare you to read the book. (Source)
Answer: As we know it, yep. But it doesn't have to be. We just need to wake up spread the word (Spread the Word as in the John 3:16 Word), pay attention, and lastly get smart people!!!! Watch this video, challenge this video, just start thinking about what's happening and ask yourself, why?
The Democrat party was responsible for vetting Sen. Barack Hussein Obama and certifying his eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States under the provisions of the United States Constitution. However, since that was not possible they just changed\omitted the language.
DOCUMENT 1
DOCUMENT 2
(You don't have to take CBW's word on this. A copy of Document 2 can be found in the election commission files of all 50 state election commission offices as well as the Democratic National Committee Headquarters complete with date stamps and matching signatures.)
Notice that BOTH Documents are Signed and Sealed Same Day by Same People!!!!
Document 1 contains the clause "Certification That Democrat Party Candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."
Document 2 - Sent to 49 of the 50 States for Certification for Placement on the Ballot REMOVES Certification of ELIGIBILITY and provides NO certification that the Candidate is legally qualified to serve in office of President.
Glenn Beck has spear-headed and organized the "Restoring Honor Rally" on tomorrow but at 8:00 tonight he has sponsored a Gala at the Kennedy Center themed "America's Divine Destiny. However, in light of Glenn Beck's position on Gay marriage, Alan keyes believes that his "piety" is hollow and he writes:
"Whatever his outward show of piety, by joining with those who decline to battle this insidious destruction of the basic premise of liberty, Beck reveals that, for political purposes, his piety is hollow. He also shows that his supposed staunch advocacy of the Constitution is hollow as well. For "If the foundations be destroyed …" what will the patriots do? And if he is willing to let them be destroyed, what is Glenn Beck really doing? One last observation: Beck's display of contempt for the "gay marriage" issue is clear evidence that he has no respect for the political authority of God. Is it just a coincidence that it comes shortly before an event meant to promote him as a pious and principled advocateof the Constitution? The "Restoring Honor Rally" is clearly meant to cement his MSM-scripted role as the spokesman for that majority of tea-party patriots, who sincerely revere God's place as the author of all unalienable right. The MSM will undoubtedly tout attendance at the event as evidence of support for his patently false view that promotion of "gay marriage" poses no threat to our Constitution, sovereignty and liberty; that the majority of Americans are willing to allow the legal abandonment of the natural family and a redefinition of rights that makes them figments of government power rather than authoritative assertions of God's will for justice. It will be tragic if sincere grass-roots enthusiasm for an apparent message of constitutional integrity lures people to build the credibility of a spokesman who has already publicly abandoned its most essential principle."
This angered a few Glenn Beck fans and prompted Mr. Keyes to post the following on his blog, Alan Keyes is Loyal to Liberty in response to an angry email he received. As usual you will find my comments in red.
"As I expected, my WND article this week has generated a remarkable reaction from readers, including a number of folks who express dismay at the fact that I (like Joseph Farah) would dare to question the sincerity of Glenn Beck’s professions of respect for God just because he belittles the importance of the ‘gay marriage’ issue.
In answer to one such ‘shame on you’ email I sent the following response, which I think worth sharing here:
Before wishing shame on me, it would repay your time to read what I have written on what the “gay marriage” issue involves. If after doing so you can still accept Beck’s careless disregard for God’s priorities, I will still pray that God may open your eyes (as I pray for Glenn Beck).
We can’t defeat the so-called progressives by accepting their standards and priorities.
I made no charges against Beck, as you call them. I simply took what he said and developed its implications. What matters is not statements and lip service, but real priorities. The moment of truth is when the battle is joined. After Judge Vaughn Walker’s decision, the battle was clearly joined. [emphasis added] Beck chose that very moment to give aid and comfort to those attacking God’s authority. Instead of reacting defensively, shouldn’t you think about the implications of that fact? “Sometimes the instruments of darkness, to win us to our harm, do tell us truths, lure us with honest trifles to betray us in deepest consequence.” [emphasis added)] “Gay marriage” involves the issue of deepest consequence-and at precisely the moment the enemy launches what he hopes will be the decisive attack, Beck makes known his un-Christlike priorities? (I say un-Christlike because Christ said “Seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness” which means that the issues of natural law (the law rooted in God’s will as sovereign author (King) of all creation) should be our first priority. He also told us that we cannot serve God and mammon, for as we honor one we dishonor the other. Whatever pious pose he adopts, Glenn Beck chose to articulate the priority of mammon. Christ said we cannot have it both ways. Who would you have me follow, Beck or Jesus? (emphasis added) [Now that is a powerful statement!How is that for real life application of God's Word ?]
I have never understood how people who profess to read and believe in the Bible can have trouble understanding that the push for gay marriage is entirely incompatible with the Biblical account of God’s will for human nature (i.e., the natural law as applied to human beings.): “…in the image of God He created him; male and female created He them.” The account of Eve’s creation makes clear that this juxtaposition is no coincidence. By himself, Adam does not fulfill God’s intention, the image of God in man is incomplete, imperfect. Only after the creation of Eve does God accept the result as the fulfillment of His will, and therefore good. Only then is the way man is made (his nature) a true reflection of the way God is making Him (i.e., the being God assumes for man as He makes him.) Thus, man is not wholly what God intends him to be until he appears in two ways, one male and one female, separate and distinct in form, but one in substance. As Adam’s description of Eve (“bone of my bone, flesh of my flesh”) suggests, they are made of the same stuff.
Eve completes the image of God in man. But as the gender distinction completes the way God intends man to be it also reveals something about the way God is. In human nature one person is male, another female, but their relations with one another imply the existence of a third person who represents the communion and unity of the two. So human nature represents one whole that nonetheless exists by way of being three distinct persons .
What Christian can fail to see the theological significance of this account of God’s intention for humanity? In light of it, we realize the theological imperative involved in the understanding that marriage is the intentional union of male and female with a view to the possibility that reproduces their unity in the form of their child.An understanding of marriage that disregards this possibility turns its back on the image of God expressed in and through our human nature. It shows the same forgetful contempt for His will that God rebukes when he prescribes the fate reserved for one who sheds innocent blood. (Genesis 9:6- “Whosoever sheddeth man’s blood by man shall his blood be shed. For in the image of God made He man.”) [ I wouldn't compare Gay marriage to murder and would not have used Genesis 9:6 to support the fact that those in favor of Gay marriage reflect blatant contempt for the will of God. While we expect non-regenerate, secular types to reject God and his Word, how on Earth can a born-again believer in the Lord Jesus Christ support Gay marriage? So, non-believers ya'll are doing what you do. My beef is with those who claim the Christ as Lord and Savior}
Who is Jesus if not the one who reminds us, in the very nature of his existence on earth, of the respect we owe to the image of God represented in our human form? Who can truly profess to believe in God’s Word and yet deny what the Bible teaches almost literally in the first words it uses to describe human nature? Can its words be true if, from the beginning, they are false as to our nature?
As Americans we must also remember that respect for the relations implied in the way God made us to be is the whole basis for the authority of the laws of nature and of nature’s God as they pertain to our humanity. Our understanding of marriage involves our respect for that authority in regard to what is literally the most fundamental of human relationships (male/ female), as well as the even more foundational relationship of God to man. If “homosexual marriage” is a true concept, then there is no natural basis for human relations, no natural right determined by God in our creation, no natural justice that governs human affairs. [emphasis added]
This is of course the contention of the moral relativists, who therefore discard the whole idea of constitutional government, acknowledging instead only the force of human will and power. It may be that people like Glenn Beck, Ann Coulter, etc. simply don’t understand this aspect of the marriage issue. If so, the crisis of liberty is too far advanced to wait until time and better instruction remedy their ignorance.More ominous is the possibility that they, or the people who manipulate their love of mammon, do understand it, and are belittling the issueso that, despite the people’s common sense opposition to ‘gay marriage’, they will not be roused in time to be effective in opposing the strategy that uses the ‘gay marriage’ issue to poison the conceptual, moral and spiritual root of liberty." (source) [emphasis added]
In my humble opinion Alan Keyes not only has great and admirable intellect but a brilliant theological mind!!!!
In light of my newly adopted political atheism and realization that the grass-root Tea Party movement has been co-opted, provocateured, and infiltrated by media whores and manipulated lovers of mammon, I will not be a useful idiot for those invisible hands who have hi-jacked not only the Tea Party movement but the RNC & the DNC. It was painful to write that because the Americans who attend these rallies are NOT THE PROBLEM and are earnestly seeking to counter the usurpation of our liberty and the tyranny that awaits us if we don't wake up. But, the sad reality is that the folks who need to hear, glean and internalize the message of liberty & freedom will not be in attendance. Neither will the media accurately portray what goes on at the rally....I've been to enough Tea Party rallies at this point to KNOW that is the case. So, what is the solution? 2 Chronicles 7:14 is the solution.
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
This video is my answer to those who question what the Tea Party Movement is about. It's about Freedom. Unfortunately, racism chasing Black folks are under the mistaken impression that it is only Black people who have been enslaved in this country. As well as the mistaken belief that the Tea Party Movement is about the continued "oppression" of Black people. Hopefully little video will help those who wish to "leave the farm" and in the case of racism chasing Black folks "leave the plantation" to do so:
Transcript: (My comments in red as usual)
This is the story of your enslavement; how it came to be, and you can finally be free.
Like all animals, human beings want to dominate and exploit the resources around them.
At first, we mostly hunted and fished and ate off the land - but then something magical and terrible happened to our minds.
We became, alone among the animals, afraid of death, and of future loss.
And this was the start of a great tragedy, and an even greater possibility...
You see, when we became afraid of death, of injury, and imprisonment, we became controllable -- and so valuable -- in a way that no other resource could ever be.
The greatest resource for any human being to control is not natural resources, or tools, or animals or land -- but other human beings.
You can frighten an animal, because animals are afraid of pain in the moment, but you cannot frighten an animal with a loss of liberty, or with torture or imprisonment in the future, because animals have very little sense of tomorrow. You cannot threaten a cow with torture, or a sheep with death. You cannot swing a sword at a tree and scream at it to produce more fruit, or hold a burning torch to a field and demand more wheat. You cannot get more eggs by threatening a hen - but you can get a man to give you his eggs by threatening him.
Human farming has been the most profitable -- and destructive -- occupation throughout history, and it is now reaching its destructive climax. [Globalist New World Order Agenda, has changed gears. They are in acceleration mode]
Human society cannot be rationally understood until it is seen for what it is: a series of farms where human farmers own human livestock.
Some people get confused because governments provide healthcare and water and education and roads, and thus imagine that there is some benevolence at work. [People like Shirley Sharrod, Joe Madison, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Van Jones, Uptown Steve and Pookie and 'em}
Nothing could be further from reality.
Farmers provide healthcare and irrigation and training to their livestock.
Some people get confused because we are allowed certain liberties, and thus imagine that our government protects our freedoms.
But farmers plant their crops a certain distance apart to increase their yields -- and will allow certain animals larger stalls or fields if it means they will produce more meat and milk. In your country, your tax farm, your farmer grants you certain freedoms not because he cares about your liberties, but because he wants to increase his profits. Are you beginning to see the nature of the cage you were born into?
There have been four major phases of human farming:
The first phase, in ancient Egypt, was direct and brutal human compulsion. Human bodies were controlled, but the creative productivity of the human mind remained outside the reach of the whip and the brand and the shackles. Slaves remained woefully underproductive, and required enormous resources to control.
The second phase was the Roman model, wherein slaves were granted some capacity for freedom, ingenuity and creativity, which raised their productivity. This increased the wealth of Rome, and thus the tax income of the Roman government - and with this additional wealth, Rome became an empire, destroying the economic freedoms that fed its power, and collapsed. I'm sure that this does not seem entirely unfamiliar.
After the collapse of Rome, the feudal model introduced the concept of livestock ownership and taxation. Instead of being directly owned, peasants farmed land that they could retain as long as they paid off the local warlords. This model broke down due to the continual subdivision of productive land, and was destroyed during the Enclosure movement, when land was consolidated, and hundreds of thousands of peasants were kicked off their ancestral lands, because new farming techniques made larger farms more productive with fewer people. The increased productivity of the late Middle Ages created the excess food required for the expansion of towns and cities, which in turn gave rise to the modern Democratic model of human ownership.
As displaced peasants flooded into the cities, a huge stock of cheap human capital became available to the rising industrialists - and the ruling class of human farmers quickly realized that they could make more money by letting their livestock choose their own occupations.
Under the Democratic model, direct slave ownership has been replaced by the Mafia model. The Mafia rarely owns businesses directly, but rather sends thugs around once a month to steal from the business "owners."
You are now allowed to choose your own occupation, which raises your productivity - and thus the taxes you can pay to your masters. Your few freedoms are preserved because they are profitable to your owners.
The great challenge of the Democratic model is that increases in wealth and freedom threaten the farmers. The ruling classes initially profit from a relatively free market in capital and labor, but as their livestock become more used to their freedoms and growing wealth, they begin to question why they need rulers at all. [emphasis added]
Ah well. Nobody ever said that human farming was easy.
Keeping the tax livestock securely in the compounds of the ruling classes is a three phase process:
The first is to indoctrinate the young through government "education." As the wealth of democratic countries grew, government schools were universally inflicted in order to control the thoughts and souls of the livestock. - (emphasis added) [That explains why Black Quasi-Socialist Progressive Fundamentalist Racism Chasers and the unwashed dumb-downed masses who buy into their rhetoric can not process the world outside of race. The racism is systemic in American society as white privilege is the status-quo meme is what is pounded into the heads and hearts of every black child in America]
The second is to turn citizens against each other through the creation of dependent livestock.(emphasis added)[The author is not taking about welfare recipients here. He is referring to those on the Farmer's payroll --think foundations, government officials, elected officials]
It is very difficult to rule human beings directly through force -- and where it can be achieved, it remains cripplingly underproductive, as can be seen in North Korea. Human beings do not breed well or produce efficiently in direct captivity.
If human beings believe that they are free, then they will produce much more for their farmers. The best way to maintain this illusion of freedom is to put some of the livestock on the payroll of the farmer. Those cows that become dependent on the existing hierarchy will then attack any other cows who point out the violence, hypocrisy and immorality of human ownership. (emphasis added)
Freedom is slavery, and slavery is freedom. [The actual quote by George Orwell is "Freedom is Slavery and Ignorance is strength" well ain't that the truth from the Globalist perspective. As long as they keep us stupid supplying us was a steady stream of entertainment and disinformation they keep their power/strength]
If you can get the cows to attack each other whenever anybody brings up the reality of their situation, then you don't have to spend nearly as much controlling them directly. [The comment section of my blogs are veritable petri dishes for this phenomena. See how Black Conservatives are attacked by telling the truth about the pathology that has taken hold of Black people in America?]
Those cows who become dependent upon the stolen largess of the farmer will violently oppose any questioning of the virtue of human ownership -- and the intellectual and artistic classes, always and forever dependent upon the farmers -- will say, to anyone who demands freedom from ownership: "You will harm your fellow cows." (emphasis added) [Think back to the Shirley Sharrod video where she impunes anyone opposed to Healthcare Reform, or the Tim Wises' of the world who feel like government and noble and enlightened White folks need to take good and special care of "our negroes" -- well he didn't actually say that but that what he implies in his writings. As if by being black you are forevermore part of a "protected class"-- oh my goodness it's just sickening and infuriating!!!! You know, I can't figure out how Black men aren't enraged by this!!??!! It's such a condensing point of view -- how emasculating!!!???]
The livestock are kept enclosed by shifting the moral responsibility for the destructiveness of a violent system to those who demand real freedom. [Here is the narrative of that reasoning "Conservatives/Republicans only care about the lives of black children while they are in utero but don't give a damn after the baby is born". How damn warped is that? What they are really saying is black life is so worthless that they support extinguishing it before it is born because "conservatives" aren't going to care about it after it's born. How utterly insane is that? That's the part with the prevailing pathology afflicting too many black folks -- looking outside of our homes for someone to give a damn about our families instead of taking responsibility ourselves. If that weren't so, why would they even fathom that "someone" other than the Mama & Daddy or hell just the Mama (truth be told) should be concerned about the "fetus" outside of the womb?]
The third phase is to invent continual external threats, so that the frightened livestock cling to the "protection" of the farmers. [This is known as the Hegelian Dialectic the critical process by which the ruling elite create a problem, anticipating in advance the reaction that the people will have to the given crisis, and thereby conditioning the people that a change is needed. When the people are properly conditioned (manipulated), the desired agenda of the ruling elite is presented as the solution (Barack Obama). The solution isn't intended to solve the problem but rather to effect public policy change -- "never let a good crisis go to waste" type of "hope and change" -- ya feel me?]
This system of human farming is now nearing its end. [This is the key point you need to wrap your head around. At least research it. Try to disprove it if you don't believe it. Get informed!!!!]
The terrible tragedy of the modern American system has occurred not in spite of, but because of past economic freedoms.
The massive increases in American wealth throughout the 19th century resulted from economic freedom -- and it was this very increase in wealth that fed the size and power of the state. Whenever the livestock become exponentially more productive, you get a corresponding increase in the number of farmers and their dependents.
The growth of the state is always proportional to the preceding economic freedoms. Economic freedoms create wealth, and the wealth attracts more thieves and political parasites, whose greed then destroys the economic freedoms. [Think about it....Progressive INCOME TAX is not voluntary -- it's compulsory and some say unconstitutional. What's more parasitic than taxing your LABOR, taxing your WORK, taxing the SWEAT of YOUR BROW -- it's sick when you really think about it]
In other words, freedom metastasizes the cancer of the state.
The government that starts off the smallest will always end up the largest.
This is why there can be no viable and sustainable alternative to a truly free and peaceful society. [Well, that's depressing. But so it is when you live in a fallen world I guess]
A society without political rulers, without human ownership, without the violence of taxation and statism...[I think that's called Heaven]
To be truly free is both very easy, and very hard.
We avoid the horror of our enslavement because it is painful to see it directly.
We dance around the violence of our dying system because we fear the attacks of our fellow livestock.[Personally, I don't give a tinkers damn about those attacks]
But we can only be kept in the cages we refuse to see. (emphasis added)
Awaken, Matrix-babies... [Wake up Black People -- Especially the Racism Chasin' Black People]
To see the farm is to leave it. [To see that this Farm/Plantation bigger and badder than the Middle Passage is to leave it--stop being the useful idiots of the Globalist]
Yesterday, Constructive Feedback posted that he supported Shirley Sharrod and thought that she had been wrongfully terminated from the USDA. I thought he had completely lost his mind before I watched the entire video. She talks about how God changed her heart after she had purposed in her mind to help Black people only. It is most unfortunate that Andrew Brietbart's editing job cost Mrs. Sharrod her job. Before you form an opinion about how wretched this woman is--watch the video:
"Life is a grind stone, but whether it grinds us down or polishes us up depends on us" - Shirley Sharrod
Although I don't agree with her "take" on the Healthcare Reform Bill or her posit that those in opposition to it are just racist who are angry about having a "Black President". Well, I'm sure she doesn't have much love for her "Black President" or the NAACP anymore since she was thrown under the bus due to damage control efforts. At least the NAACP recanted it's initial position on her termination but the same can't be said for the Obama Administration.
Dr. Stanley Monteith discusses secret societies and how they have directed the course of history and how this impacts our society today. Dr. Monteith shares the amazing facts he unearthed after 40 years of research. He reveals the identity of the mysterious forces behind the men who rule the world, and why some of our leaders have dedicated their lives to destroying this nation.
Robin Martin is a member of the Project 21 black leadership network. Martin runs the Conservative Black Woman blog and has appeared on numerous television programs, including the Fox News Channel’s Glenn Beck and PBS’s To the Contrary.
I condemn the NAACP because they are no longer advancing the cause of freedom and equality. They are instead advancing a sophomoric, short sighted, and reactionary resolution to brand the Tea Party Movement as “racist”. They act as a police group for racial bigotry but only as it pertains to black people — notice the silence of the NAACP regarding the Black Panther member’s call to bash the heads of white babies. It’s unfortunate that the NAACP has become nothing more than a divisive cabal of Black Quasi-Socialist Progressive Fundamentalist Racism Chasers who are more interested in identity politics than they are in a prosperous and free nation.
You would think they would logically deduce that the loss of civil liberties and personal freedoms for Americans in general is clearly not a winning proposition for Black people. If they were truly concerned with the advancement of people of color, then they would be “tea-partying”.
Longtime radio host and Immigration Champion Terry Anderson died on Wednesday. Anderson was known for voicing his opinion on the negative impacts that America’s current immigration system has on Black Americans. He was highly critical of the Bush and Obama Administrations and regularly had Immigration Champions such as Former Rep. Tom Tancredo and Rep. Brian Bilbray on his radio program.Terry died of pancreatic cancer.
Terry is survived by his wife Melanie, who was also his high school sweetheart, two sons, and two grandchildren. He was born in Oakland, Calif., but moved to South Los Angeles when he was a youngster and lived there ever since. After starting his radio show in November 2000, Terry would have broadcast for the 500th time in a few weeks. He’s known for his well-prepared opening monologues, which he often spent 20-30 hours a week to prepare. In 10 years, he never missed a show, although he was pre-empted a few times by his home station on very short notice.
Terry Anderson’s website was dedicated to fighting for lower immigration levels to help impoverished Black Americans. He provided links to the various organizations, including NumbersUSA and our Immigration-Reduction Report Cards. He honored Border Patrol agents who lost their lives in the line of duty and provided a platform for candidates and public office holders looking to reduce overall immigration numbers.
In the weeks leading up to his death, Terry Anderson had J.D. Hayworth, Republican challenger to John McCain, and Russell Pearce, author of Arizona’s new immigration enforcement law, on his radio program. In his “Clown of the Week” segment, he blasted the Obama Administration for their decision to sue the state of Arizona as well as DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, and head of the Los Angeles Archdiocese Cardinal Roger Mahony. (Source)
This article linked below made my liver quiver. While people are talking about Lebron James and Lindsey Lohan, our future is being malevolently orchestrated. But rather than reading this article and at least trying to debunk the very disturbing information contained therein, most will just dismiss it and pick up a magazine.
What a slothful lot of imbeciles we are culturally, intellectually, and spiritually. These are very dangerous times. We need to WAKE UP!
I don't know very much about Hip Hop, but what is called "Hip Hop" these days is a far cry from what I was dancing to in high school (The Sugar Hill Gang, Grand Master Flash & the Furious Five, Kurtis Blow and Run DMC). However, Alan Watt and the the brother who called into the show certainly did provide food for thought:
(H/T to blogger at http://openyourmindseye.blogspot.com where I found this video)
I wonder why the left leaning, liberal racism chasers of the blogosphere aren't posting the below listed article? They aren't posting it because the data does not support their "bitch and moan", "blame whitey", "we have it so bad because of institutional racism" meme. Seems to me that affirmative action is in full effect--and we ya'll wonder why white folks question the competence of black professionals.
Data are now available from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) on acceptance rates at medical schools for all students (data here) and acceptance rates for minority students (Hispanic, Black or Native American, data here), by MCAT and GPA, for the years 2007-2009 aggregated. From those data, I was able to create the table above for the acceptance rates for non-minorities (I'm assuming white and Asian), and compare to the acceptance rates for minorities, for those applicants with an MCAT score of 24-26 and a GPA between 3.00 and 3.19. In the past, the AAMC used to list whites, Asians, blacks, Hispanics and Native Americans separately, but it now only provides data for two categories: all applicants and minorities, so I had to do the calculation myself to determine the non-minority acceptance rate.
Perhaps the AAMC wishes to make the comparisons of acceptance rates by ethic groups harder, because the results above are pretty dramatic, and maybe this is what it is trying to hide? This is just one example of many: for those applicants to medical school with an MCAT of 24-26 and GPA of 3.00-3.19, fewer than one out of 20 non-minorities will be accepted, while almost one out of two minorities will be admitted. In other words, some minority applicants have almost a ten time greater chance of being accepted to medical school than their non-minority counterparts with the exact same credentials. (Source)
So, basically what the AAMC is saying is if you are White or Asian and you can't score any higher than 26 on your MCAT or maintain a GPA above 3.19 then you are not intelligent enough to gain entry. However, if you are Black or Native American and you score between 24-26 -- well, what more can we expect from you as you are clearly genetically intellectually inferior. How paradoxical it is that Black Quasi-Socialist Progressive Fundamentalist Racism Chasers fail to see the racism inherent in Affirmative Action.
I lifted this from Denmark Vesey's blog and changed it ever so slightly to suit my preferences....While I've been praying for Mini-Me's future husband since she was about 7, how I wish that I could choose\arrange her marriage. How great would that be?
Interested in handsome young black men born between 1988 and 1991, vaccine free raised on a diet of non-GMO food for the purposes of marriage in 2021. Must be from a bible believing (not just "church-going") Christian family with multi-generational relationships. Preferably the young man will have been raised with a good model of marriage and fatherhood. If he wasn't fortunate enough to have his father in his life on a daily basis, his mother will have done a good job nurturing and developing his masculinity and preparing him to lead a family. Prefer athletic outdoors types with an amiable personality not unfamiliar with the occasional fist fight. Developed tastes in art, literature and music preferably NOT Hip Hop. Well developed critical thinking and language skills are an absolute MUST. Lastly, Plantation Negros or black men who call themselves "African-American" will not be considered.
Another noteworthy article I happened upon this morning which I thought I should re-post here. It was written by Eric Blair:
There has been much in the mainstream news recently about population control. In fact, there seems to be a concerted effort by the Elite to introduce the idea as a legitimate debate about dealing with the “problem” of over-population. It appears the elite are trying to legitimize these claims using the global warming argument that CO2, which humans exhale, must be minimized at all costs.
Understandably, the notion that a small group of powerful people is consciously and methodically trying to kill off the majority of the population is a tough pill to swallow. Incidentally, people who refuse to question the events of September 11th usually do so for one reason: they don’t want to believe that the conspirators would kill over 3000 innocent people to advance their agenda. However, what has taken place in the aftermath of 9/11 seems to prove the true nature of the Elite in regards to how little they value human life.
For instance, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) knowingly lied about the air quality at ground zero, which has caused countless more illnesses and deaths among brave first responders, much like the EPA is now lying about the air quality surrounding the Gulf oil spill. Additionally, the attack on 9/11 spurred America’s preemptive, unprovoked, unsubstantiated wars for profit and resources in Iraq and Afghanistan where an estimated 1.5 million innocent people have been killed.
Concerned researchers have tried to warn the public for decades that depopulation plans were indeed happening in stealth, quoting members of the ruling class like Rockefeller and others who clearly had motivation to implement them.
“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.” — Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund, quoted in “Are You Ready For Our New Age Future?” Insiders Report, American Policy Center, December, 1995.
Or, more recently, Ted Turner, CNN founder and UN supporter told PBS’s Charlie Rose in April, 2008, “We’re too many people; that’s why we have global warming . . . too many people are using too much stuff.” Couple this with his June, 1996 statement well before the general public was aware of “global warming” in the McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
In the third world, Turner has contributed billions to population reduction, through United Nations programs, paving the way for others like of Bill and Melinda Gates, and Warren Buffett. These same figures have also donated vast sums of money to Planned Parenthood and vaccination programs that many have identified as methods of population control.
Now that the public is becoming more aware of the malevolent nature of the Elite, it is becoming easier to believe the evidence of their sinister “population control” plans. These ingenious techniques include poisoning the food, water, air, and drugs as identified in Paul Ehrlich’s 1968 book The Population Bomb, “One plan often mentioned involves the addition of temporary sterilants to water supplies or staple food. Doses of the antidote would be carefully rationed by the government to produce the desired population size (p.130-131).” The Elite’s previously secret “soft kill” methods have been in place for decades and are now verifiable by the general public.
1. Food: GMO (genetically modified organisms) foods that represent around 75% of the American diet, especially non-reproductive “terminator seeds,” have proven to cause mass sterilization within only three generations.
2. Water: For decades privately-owned “public” water systems have been chlorinated and fluoridated along with other dangerous chemicals used to dumb us down and sterilize our children.
3. Air: In addition to industry-based air pollution that has caused increased cases of asthma, the air is being strategically poisoned through Chemtrail disbursements of dangerous elements like Aluminum. (Coincidentally, Monsanto has designed aluminum-resistant seeds)
4. Drugs: The Elite are drug pushers, using Big Pharma (and illegal drugs) to pacify the mind and spirit of the public, while inducing diseases through tainted vaccinations, etc.
After years of using humans as cannon fodder abroad and domestic soft kill methods mainly through sterilization programs, it now seems obvious that humans are nothing more than sheep for slaughter to feed the Elite. Behind each one of these methods, we find the same Elite multinational companies working in concert with elements of the government that are supposed to look out for the public’s best interests like the EPA, FDA, and the DHS. Furthermore, we can expect the Elite to ramp up the mainstream population debate under the auspices of Climate Change as the Gulf oil disaster brings Cap and Trade legislation back to the forefront.(Source)
I ran across this article this morning and decided that it was worth re-printing. It was written by Alexander Massa:
There is an epidemic spreading like wildfire across America. No, the Centers for Disease Control hasn’t issued a warning for this outbreak. I assure you, it is all too real, and it is wreaking havoc across America on all fronts: social, economic, political, religious, and many, many others. What is this mystery disease I am speaking of?
It is ignorance the most destructive disease of the mind, a deadly corrosion of our collective intellectual capacity. You may be thinking that while ignorance is certainly not a good thing, it really isn’t a disease. Oh no? Tell me, which has wrought more destruction and caused the downfall of America? Is it tuberculosis, or AIDS, or leprosy? No, it is ignorance.
I have seen this disease firsthand on many occasions. Whether it be shown in people who strain to remember who the Vice-President of the United States is, or those who have no clue what a Secretary of State is, it is the growing mass of ignorant individuals, and the overall ignorance of the populace, which are destroying our sacred Republic. The more stupid the population gets, the more ignorant the populace becomes, the more powerful our shady overlords become – and the men pulling the strings behind the grand curtain just laugh in amusement. (emphasis added)
Yet, instead of rebelling against the chains that bind us, the American people seem more than willing to oblige their masters, and indeed, exceed their expectations as far as general idiocy and general compliance and submission are concerned. The ruling class is content with the conduct of the plebeians, and will continue to be as long as it suits their purposes. They have yet to crack down on the population, however, they most certainly seem to be preparing for that inevitability. One merely need to note the deadly militarization of our local police forces and the erection of much-rumored FEMA internment camps nationwide. (emphasis added)
When that fateful day comes, many Americans will finally snap awake. However, it will be far too late by then. Many debate today whether it is already too late to stem the tide of tyranny and terror and take back our Republic. I, for one, do not believe it it too late. However, we haven’t much time to spare, either.
The American people need to wake up, immediately, if they want to save their Republic, turn back their increasingly socialist economy, and regain their fast eroding Bill of Right rights. The oppressors of man have lit the fateful match, and it is now edging perilously closer to our Constitution. Whether two-hundred years of freedom and civil liberties go up in smoke is entirely up to you the American citizen. The so-called common man. The stereotypical ‘Average Joe.’
The fate of America is not up to the elites. Our masters have only as much power as we allow them, and today the American people are being quite generous…others would suggest dumbed down and asleep at the switch. It is past time to remind those at the pinnacle of the societal pyramid who really is in control who has the power over the destiny of this great nation of ours. It is us all of us.(emphasis added)
Yet, we are not guaranteed such power. It can be taken from us as we are witnessing now. The elites do not fully hold the reins of power quite yet, but that dark day is just around the corner. The most heart-breaking part of this whole affair is that the transfer of power is being done willingly and with a smile. The elites and New World Order crowd are not ripping power out of our hands. Rather, we are peacefully, IGNORANTLY, transferring it to them. They don’t want bloodshed any more than you do. Indeed, violence would hurt their cause, for it would expose them to be exactly what they are bloodthirsty tyrants. They would much rather the peaceful dismantling of the republican form of government than a bloody crackdown on the American people. (emphasis added)
So, are we going to allow them to take our rights from us without a fight? I sincerely hope not. In order to halt that, the American people are going to have to wake up from their ignorant, eternal slumber, and fast. It seems whenever the ‘Sleeping Giant’ is roused, he quickly goes back to sleep. That trend is deadly for the immediate and long term future of our nation. Unless it can be permanently reversed, there is no guarantee our Republic will be around much longer. Indeed, if the American people cannot sufficiently come to grips with the terrible reality we all face, namely the Zionist totalitarian tendencies of most of our so-called ‘elected’ leaders, the only guarantee that can be made is that our Republic will not survive.(Because I'm not sure what the author of this article means by the Zionist, I'm not co-signing that last sentences. But I will say that the terrible reality we face is that our government has been overtaken by globalist who wish to dismantle this Republic)
If you are not already informed of the dangers our nation faces, please take the time to learn about them. We are all, young and old, are counting on you. Only you can save the Republic and turn the tide for America. If you fail us in this, our finest…and, perhaps, last hour, you will hang your head in shame and regret for the rest of time. (Emphasis added)
As I said, in my view there is still time left, but the clocking is ticking ever faster.
So what will you do? Will you stand up for Liberty and all that America is supposed to stand for and fight for freedom? Or, will you continue to sit down and let the totalitarians run roughshod over you and your rights? It is in your hands now. The destiny of this country belongs to you. With great power comes even greater responsibility. Now, John Q. Public, let’s see just how responsible you are. (Emphasis added) (Source)
Lester Kinsolving, a reporter for World Net Daily and now the second most senior member of the White House Press Corps asked a very simple question about President Obama's social security number on Thursday June 10,2010. Not only did Mr. Gibbs not answer the question -- but Gibbs dodged the question entirely by diverting, then ridiculing, then attacking. See below:
This is disturbing on so many levels that I hardly know where to begin...
The Correspondents
Did you notice the expressions on their faces when Mr. Kinsolving asked the questions? He asked two uncomplicated, straightforward, reasonable questions,"Why is the President using a social security number reserved for Connecticut applicants?" and "Do you know or have any record of the President ever having a mailing address in Connecticut?" Why would the Press Corps be annoyed by such questions? I'm also wondering why the guy in the front row felt compelled to walk out just after the first question?
Are these journalist too lazy to explore or at the very least seek to debunk the claim that President Obama is using a social security number of a deceased Connecticut man who would be 120 years old today? Are they under the mistaken impression that they are too intellectually and/or politically astute to entertain such claims? If so, how shamefully arrogant they are! Or could it be that they have been ordered to ignore, reject, and keep their mouths shut or lose their jobs? If so, by whom? Whatever the reason, We The People are mislead, misguided and misinformed in the process. If the press is not free, then WE are not free. BTW, the video now on C-Span has been scrubbed and Mr. Kinsolving's question is curiously absent.
Robert "I, I, I, Um, Um, Um"Gibbs
Gibbs never answered the questions. Instead, knowing that the dumbed down American public have been systematically "conditioned" by the propaganda they have been "conditioned" to think is "news" to dismiss those identified as truthers as racist, right-wing, conspiracy kooks, he brings up the birth certificate issue (which is a legitimate yet demonized issue). He followed the typical tract of an individual who is hiding something....deflect, ridicule, and attack. So, although Mr. Kinsolving wasn't asking about the birth certificate, he conceded that it would be great if he could see it to which Gibbs told a bold-faced lie straight from the pit of hell. He claims that he not only saw Obama's real birth certificate, but he posted it online. Everyone within earshot of that lie should have been infuriated at how stupid this White House and it's inhabitants think we are! He posted a certificate of live birth not a birth certificate and even that was proven to be a forgery!
The level of corruption we are witnessing at this time is astounding, absolutely astounding. God help us.
The Los Angeles NAACP have made themselves look utterly ridiculous. So, now it's racist to utter the word "black" and "hole" in the same sentence? They automatically assume that the Hallmark audio card is saying "black whore"??? Talk about self-hatred and having an inferiority complex!!! Perhaps they were educated in the liberal run public school system and have never heard of the solar system or black holes.
I believe this is the most ignorant group of black quasi-socialist progressive fundamentalist racism chasers I've seen all year.
Hallmark was wrong to pull these cards from the shelves. They've been "punked".
What a heinous indictment. How I wish it were a lie. However, if 52% of pregnancies end in abortion for black women then how is the womb of a black woman a safe place?
Watch this video, then ask yourself if a woman has a "right" to do this. Then remember what Pastor Childress said "If abortions were not lucrative they would not be legal"
Mark J. Perry is a professor of economics and finance in the 
, “One plan often mentioned involves the addition of temporary sterilants to water supplies or staple food. Doses of the antidote would be carefully rationed by the government to produce the desired population size (p.130-131).” The Elite’s previously secret “soft kill” methods have been in place for decades and are now verifiable by the general public.
